Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would combine
> various current and proposed features. It would occupy no more than 2 lines
> vertically, and preferably more like 1. It would include:
> - The Simple vs Advanced mode switch.
> - The current sec
Hello,
Here is some try from Sich and myself to think about the design for some
insert on demand application based on the WoT plugin.
---
key structure :
ssk/filesharing/updates/inserts/x/inserts
ssk/f
Am Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009 18:53:40 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:44:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would combine
> > various current and proposed features. It would occupy no more than 2
> > lines vertically, and p
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Florent Daigniere
wrote:
> Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>> Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
>>> keep it (although everyone else seems to want to get rid of it). We d
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 17:48:34 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> IMHO the above is totally unrealistic.
Does that settle the Progress bar question?
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
http://i
Le mardi 02 juin 2009 18:53:40, Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:44:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would combine
> > various current and proposed features. It would occupy no more than 2
> > lines vertically, and pre
* clement [2009-06-02 18:46:38]:
> Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a ?crit :
> > clement wrote:
> > > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez ?crit :
> > >> Nice!
> > >>
> > >> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
> > >> Would you be i
Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a ?crit :
> clement wrote:
> > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez ?crit :
> >> Nice!
> >>
> >> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
> >> Would you be interested in continuing this work?
> >
> > Nextge
chment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/a5565097/attachment.pgp>
e Freenet just to shut it down. On the other hand, it
is well established that background apps are in the system tray, and can be
removed from there.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/47c79249/attachment.pgp>
tem, then we
> can "hide" many controls or info messages into a single word/icon.
>
> +-++--+
> | Control | Security Level | Messages (3) |
> | - - - - \-\ -+--+
> | Pause network |
> | Shutdown node |
> | Res
achment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/8c90bb30/attachment.pgp>
hat Dieppe's work on content reorganisation is good...
------ next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/547d0e87/attachment.pgp>
a
good idea. We should however have a system tray applet for the same purpose.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/8554df70/attachment.pgp>
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/a4faba4a/attachment.pgp>
bbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/f92d923f/attachment.pgp>
http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/e62f9952/attachment.pgp>
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/a0cac554/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 18:24:48 steve wrote:
>> What good is constantly displaying the security level, unless the user would
>> like to change it frequently for some reason?
>>
>> The node already asks them which level they want at install
totally unrealistic.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/ff252bdd/attachment.pgp>
u.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/4095893c/attachment.html>
roject.org/view.php?id=2996
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/346fd3ec/attachment.pgp>
out if we want to keep mantis
> (which I'm clearly not in favor of).
They are not going to go out of their way to let us migrate our existing data,
surely?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/d572d132/attachment.pgp>
ar we are not.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/494e6176/attachment.pgp>
t.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/696a2fc2/attachment.pgp>
his is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/b6fd9275/attachment.pgp>
d message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/9cdaea76/attachment.pgp>
more inserts...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/aca12667/attachment.pgp>
Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Florent Daigniere
> wrote:
>> Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>> On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
keep it (although everyone else seems to
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would combine
> various current and proposed features. It would occupy no more than 2 lines
> vertically, and preferably more like 1. It would include:
> - The Simple vs Advanced mode switch.
> - The current sec
t; | Pause network |
> | Shutdown node |
> | Restart node |
> +---+
>
> Would such a status bar be visible when browsing "freesites" or only on
> "node pages"?
>
> --
> Robert Hailey
>
>
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/74ced46e/attachment.html>
s scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/a7d36b3a/attachment.pgp>
I hadn't considered that, but would that not require FCP messages to be sent
to the node? Right now at least the apps i've written don't use FCP, in part
because the libraries to do so with C/C++ don't appear to be complete.
>
> A statusbar is also a good place for the PANIC® button
>
> _
Am Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009 09:24:29 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> On Monday, 1. June 2009 17:29:05 steve wrote:
> > I looked into doing this with Java to make it cross platform, but since
> > most Macs lack java6 right now it is non-trivial, and java6 is where the
> > systray class was apparen
en we
can "hide" many controls or info messages into a single word/icon.
+-++--+
| Control | Security Level | Messages (3) |
| - - - - \-\ -+--+
| Pause network |
| Shutdown node |
| Restart node |
+---+
Would such a status bar be visible when browsing "freesites" or only
on "node pages"?
--
Robert Hailey
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/3ab12565/attachment.html>
Hello,
Here is some try from Sich and myself to think about the design for some
insert on demand application based on the WoT plugin.
---
key structure :
ssk/filesharing/updates/inserts/x/inserts
ssk/f
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
>> keep it (although everyone else seems to want to get rid of it). We don't
>> have any other need for php afaik, although we need SSL
clement wrote:
> Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez ?crit :
>> Nice!
>>
>> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
>> Would you be interested in continuing this work?
> Nextgens is currently working on the website (sorry again), and I don't have
> much
* clement [2009-06-02 18:46:38]:
> Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a écrit :
> > clement wrote:
> > > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit :
> > >> Nice!
> > >>
> > >> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
> > >> Would you be i
tachments/20090602/8337c07f/attachment.pgp>
Am Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009 18:53:40 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:44:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would combine
> > various current and proposed features. It would occupy no more than 2
> > lines vertically, and p
Dieppe's posts indirectly referred to a status page. What would be on such a
page? Shutdown and restart, maybe, but then they wouldn't be displayed
constantly. How would such a page differ from the statistics page in simple
mode?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 18:06:20 clement wrote:
> Le mardi 02 juin 2009 18:53:40, Matthew Toseland a écrit :
> > On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:44:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would combine
> > > various current and proposed features. It w
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 17:48:34 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> IMHO the above is totally unrealistic.
Does that settle the Progress bar question?
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
http://i
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 18:17:37 Robert Hailey wrote:
>
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:44:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would
> >> combine various current and proposed features
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 18:24:48 steve wrote:
> What good is constantly displaying the security level, unless the user would
> like to change it frequently for some reason?
>
> The node already asks them which level they want at install time and it is
> easily accessible from the config page, so w
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:46:38 clement wrote:
> Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a écrit :
> > clement wrote:
> > > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit :
> > >> Nice!
> > >>
> > >> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
> > >> W
What good is constantly displaying the security level, unless the user would
like to change it frequently for some reason?
The node already asks them which level they want at install time and it is
easily accessible from the config page, so what do they gain by being
constantly reminded which secu
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> On Thursday 21 May 2009 17:32:55 Juiceman wrote:
>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Zero3 wrote:
>>> Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>>> Detecting the version of an installed application in the la
On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:44:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would
combine various current and proposed features. It would occupy no
more than 2 lines vertically, and preferably more
Le mardi 02 juin 2009 18:53:40, Matthew Toseland a écrit :
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:44:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would combine
> > various current and proposed features. It would occupy no more than 2
> > lines vertically, and pre
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:44:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would combine
> various current and proposed features. It would occupy no more than 2 lines
> vertically, and preferably more like 1. It would include:
> - The Simple vs Advanced
Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a écrit :
> clement wrote:
> > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit :
> >> Nice!
> >>
> >> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
> >> Would you be interested in continuing this work?
> >
> > Nextge
I propose a permanently visible status bar in fproxy, which would combine
various current and proposed features. It would occupy no more than 2 lines
vertically, and preferably more like 1. It would include:
- The Simple vs Advanced mode switch.
- The current security levels.
- The selected langu
On Saturday 23 May 2009 01:20:23 Clément wrote:
> > > #Connections to friends + connections to strangers :
>
> > > Why showing informations about the current activity of
> > > the node ?
> >
> > Good question. Some of it is per-node so clearly has to be here (but only
> > in advanced mode), but th
pe: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/6ace97ef/attachment.pgp>
non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/42de9752/attachment.pgp>
nds.draketo.de
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/f339ded7/attachment.pgp>
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 16:29:31 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some
> > period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest
> > of the year we a
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some
> period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest
> of the year we are not.
I think a progress bar would only be useful if there'd be a c
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 13:53:37 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> I have had some very bad experience with SF's servers around year 2001.
> It was slow and buggy. Is that fixed now?
They did some nice updates - I didn't have bad experiences with it for years,
now.
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 14:27:10 Florent Daigniere wrote:
> Daniel Cheng wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Florent Daigniere
> > wrote:
> >> Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> >>> On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Having said that, we might need somewhere to put
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 15:08:22 xor wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 02:32:33 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Clément wrote:
> > > Oh, and I almost forgot : we should keep the financial status on the
> > > homepage, between the download link and the news (we got rid of
On Monday 01 June 2009 14:25:10 sich wrote:
> some french translation
>
Committed in 7001bda
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 08:24:29 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Monday, 1. June 2009 17:29:05 steve wrote:
> > I looked into doing this with Java to make it cross platform, but since
> > most Macs lack java6 right now it is non-trivial, and java6 is where the
> > systray class was apparentl
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 05:08:55 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
> I like the 1214 menu much more than the 1213 one. With 1213 I had to
> do alot of clicks
> any time I wanted to navigate to a submenu, now its much easier.
IMHO it might work better with a horizontal menu? The sky theme has this,
al
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 05:08:55 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
> Inserts work now, except a ~200MB file which now gives me error reason
> 'InsertException.shortError.0'
> after it failed at 97%. But I tried it only 1 time for now, just
> wondered about the error text.
I have seen that once, it
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 02:32:33 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Clément wrote:
> > Oh, and I almost forgot : we should keep the financial status on the
> > homepage, between the download link and the news (we got rid of it
> > because we found on the moment it wasn't rele
Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Florent Daigniere
> wrote:
>> Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>> On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
keep it (although everyone else seems to
I like the 1214 menu much more than the 1213 one. With 1213 I had to
do alot of clicks
any time I wanted to navigate to a submenu, now its much easier.
Inserts work now, except a ~200MB file which now gives me error reason
'InsertException.shortError.0'
after it failed at 97%. But I tried it only
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Florent Daigniere
wrote:
> Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>> Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
>>> keep it (although everyone else seems to want to get rid of it). We d
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 02:20:07 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Freenet 0.7 build 1214 is now available, please upgrade, it will be
> mandatory on Sunday. Major changes in 1214:
[...]
> - Significant improvements to the clean theme by Artefact2, including not
> using buttons (and especially not black on
Am Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009 09:24:29 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> On Monday, 1. June 2009 17:29:05 steve wrote:
> > I looked into doing this with Java to make it cross platform, but since
> > most Macs lack java6 right now it is non-trivial, and java6 is where the
> > systray class was apparen
gnustep.org/
>
> Best wishes,
> Arne
>
> --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
> - singing a part of the history of free software -
> http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/1145369a/attachment.html>
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
>> keep it (although everyone else seems to want to get rid of it). We don't
>> have any other need for php afaik, although we need SSL
clement wrote:
> Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit :
>> Nice!
>>
>> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
>> Would you be interested in continuing this work?
> Nextgens is currently working on the website (sorry again), and I don't have
> much
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 09:35:24 steve wrote:
> I can certainly look into it, and i know of some projects to make it
> possible.
Great!
Many thanks!
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
call by command line. Otherwise we will have to bundle
> yet another third party utility.
Well, they should be fetched from
http[s]://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/, not from downloads...
are the relevant files currently available from checksums?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/24d8a49d/attachment.pgp>
ext attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/541372d8/attachment.pgp>
gned message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/d269f3fb/attachment.pgp>
- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/1c84875b/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> On Thursday 21 May 2009 17:32:55 Juiceman wrote:
>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Zero3 wrote:
>>> Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>>> Detecting the version of an installed application in the la
detect the bandwidth limits on more routers.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attach
I can certainly look into it, and i know of some projects to make it
possible.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Monday, 1. June 2009 17:29:05 steve wrote:
> > I looked into doing this with Java to make it cross platform, but since
> > most Macs lack java6 right
On Monday, 1. June 2009 13:55:29 sashee wrote:
> We had a policy where I worked for some time, that if a bug is
> inactive for some time, and cannot be reproduced by the developer,
> will be force closed.
I know that from many other projects.
IIRC Gentoo uses "NEEDINFO" for that.
Best wishes,
On Monday, 1. June 2009 17:29:05 steve wrote:
> I looked into doing this with Java to make it cross platform, but since
> most Macs lack java6 right now it is non-trivial, and java6 is where the
> systray class was apparently introduced.
Could this work with the crossplatform GNUstep library
On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
> keep it (although everyone else seems to want to get rid of it). We don't
> have any other need for php afaik, although we need SSL redirects.
How about hosting man
87 matches
Mail list logo
