On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at last
> year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
> different set of blocks each time) in order to largely solve our security
> problems
> -Original Message-
> From: arne_bab at web.de [mailto:arne_bab at web.de]
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:21 AM
> To: devl at freenetproject.org
> Cc: xor
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Non-convergent encryption kills
> easy filesharing
>
> Am Donner
On Thursday 23 April 2009 09:37:45 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at
last
> > year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
> > different set of
> To: devl at freenetproject.org
> > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Non-convergent encryption kills
> > easy filesharing
> >
> > Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > > block [16:39:31] duplicating the top block can be done with
> > > SSK
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Arne
> Babenhauserheide
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:14 AM
> To: devl at freenetproject.org
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Non-conver
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> block [16:39:31] duplicating the top block can be done with SSKs
> very easily [16:39:40] but with CHKs it requires much longer URIs
> [16:39:43] is that a problem?
> [16:40:04] how much longer?
> [16:40:10] CHK@,, -> CHK@ key
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
block [16:39:31] toad_ duplicating the top block can be done with SSKs
very easily [16:39:40] toad_ but with CHKs it requires much longer URIs
[16:39:43] toad_ is that a problem?
[16:40:04] p0s how much longer?
[16:40:10] toad_
-Original Message-
From: devl-boun...@freenetproject.org
[mailto:devl-boun...@freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Arne
Babenhauserheide
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:14 AM
To: devl@freenetproject.org
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Non-convergent encryption kills
easy filesharing
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at last
year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
different set of blocks each time) in order to largely solve
] Non-convergent encryption kills
easy filesharing
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
block [16:39:31] toad_ duplicating the top block can be done with
SSKs very easily [16:39:40] toad_ but with CHKs it requires much
longer URIs [16:39:43] toad_
] Non-convergent encryption kills
easy filesharing
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
block [16:39:31] toad_ duplicating the top block can be done with
SSKs very easily [16:39:40] toad_ but with CHKs it requires much
longer URIs [16:39:43] toad_
On Thursday 23 April 2009 09:37:45 Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at
last
year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
-Original Message-
From: arne_...@web.de [mailto:arne_...@web.de]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:21 AM
To: devl@freenetproject.org
Cc: xor
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Non-convergent encryption kills
easy filesharing
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 09:25:15 schrieb xor
After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at last
year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
different set of blocks each time) in order to largely solve our security
problems will make filesharing on Freenet much less convenient.
Other
After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at last
year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
different set of blocks each time) in order to largely solve our security
problems will make filesharing on Freenet much less convenient.
Other
15 matches
Mail list logo
