[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like >> these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between >> nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what yo

Re: [freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like >> these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between >> nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what yo

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like > these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between > nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are imitating is > purely peer t

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are imitating is purely peer to peer, in which case you need to look at the other nodes' connec

Re: [freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like > these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between > nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are imitating is > purely peer t

Re: [freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are imitating is purely peer to peer, in which case you need to look at the other nodes' connec

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: >use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this > idea. I just added the mailbody as comment :) Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part o

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

This is a very good idea! Please go here http://freenet.uservoice.c configuration om/pages/8861-general/suggest

Re: [freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: >use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this > idea. I just added the mailbody as comment :) Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part o

Re: [freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

This is a very good idea! Please go here http://freenet.uservoice.c configuration om/pages/8861-general/suggest

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

Hi, It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the possibility that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the internet). I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of por

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

Hi, It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the possibility that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the internet). I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of por