Actually I'm no longer sure the cons of having relative reference overcomes the
pros of having only absolute references.
Re the rename use case I had defined, it's probably not that bad to use the
compact entity reference serializer (which I have already written) to use the
minimal syntax for
On Jan 4, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Actually I'm no longer sure the cons of having relative reference overcomes
the pros of having only absolute references.
Re the rename use case I had defined, it's probably not that bad to use the
compact entity reference serializer
On 1/1/10 11:35 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Is SmartGWT actually used by the WYSWYG editor in latest XWiki releases?
I think only indirectly : it's the tree view (xwikiexplorer.js) that is
based on smartGWT, and the WYSIWYG uses the it for browsing the wiki in
dialogs.
Jerome.
paul
Le
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 21:09, Jessica Hawkwell
ladyserenaki...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm starting on a re-implementation of the LDAP implementation for XWiki, an
implementation that performs upward sync instead of downward sync (updating
LDAP instead of updating XWiki). This is for
On Jan 4, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Hi devs,
Taking advantage of the less noisy period of the holidays, Flavius,
Marta and myself have developed a new wizard for editing color themes,
much more WYSIWYG. It still needs work, but the current version is
already very
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:05, Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:51, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi devs,
Taking advantage of the less noisy period of the holidays, Flavius,
Marta and myself have developed a new wizard for editing color
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:51, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi devs,
Taking advantage of the less noisy period of the holidays, Flavius,
Marta and myself have developed a new wizard for editing color themes,
much more WYSIWYG. It still needs work, but the current version is
already
On 1/4/10 10:51 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Hi devs,
Taking advantage of the less noisy period of the holidays, Flavius,
Marta and myself have developed a new wizard for editing color themes,
much more WYSIWYG. It still needs work, but the current version is
already very usable, so it should
On 01/04/2010 11:05 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:51, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi devs,
Taking advantage of the less noisy period of the holidays, Flavius,
Marta and myself have developed a new wizard for editing color themes,
much more WYSIWYG. It still
Ok, thanks,
the reason I ask is that I was pleasantly surprised by the new wysiwyg
editor, it's sleek and easy to use with very intuitive menus for me
Macintoshien dans l'âme, while I suspect an evaluation of this has
been done for Windowers as well.
Good job, don't bring another layer
Very impressive!
ps: there's 2 validation errors ;)
JV.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi devs,
Taking advantage of the less noisy period of the holidays, Flavius,
Marta and myself have developed a new wizard for editing color themes,
much more
On 01/04/2010 11:46 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Very impressive!
ps: there's 2 validation errors ;)
One is caused by the rendering, it creates a p around the div inside
the {{html}} macro. I had the same problem with the DeletedDocuments.
Should be investigated by Thomas.
The other one is
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:59, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
On 01/04/2010 11:46 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Very impressive!
ps: there's 2 validation errors ;)
One is caused by the rendering, it creates a p around the div inside
the {{html}} macro. I had the same problem with
On 01/04/2010 12:20 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:59, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com wrote:
On 01/04/2010 11:46 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Very impressive!
ps: there's 2 validation errors ;)
One is caused by the rendering, it creates ap around thediv inside
Right now it adds another
tab in the AllDocs wiki index, called Deleted Documents, and I'm not
sure if it's the best thing to do.
+ it's one place where all the things in the wiki can be seen
+ it's easy to find
I think the location is ok for its purpose, gives you a centralized place
Obs.
Regarding attachment actions: I think we should remove the Edit action
since is useless for most users and keep only the delete attachment action.
Also:
The History needs to be modified to manage|display Addition - Deletion -
Restoring of attachments.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 13:26, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
On 01/04/2010 12:20 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:59, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com wrote:
On 01/04/2010 11:46 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Very impressive!
ps: there's 2 validation errors ;)
Hi,
Very nice :P
___Remarks on the current UI___:
1. The position for the palette.gif is not constant (down for main
containers, up for the rest);
2. The palette.gif representing #xwikimaincontainter and #mainContentArea
are always visible when hovering on other child elements. This is not
___Remarks on the current UI___
6. When I change the color using the palette wheel: the input color is
changing on every click, but the ColorThemes preview does not reflect the
change, unless I close the wheel.
7. How can I undo the color change made with the wheel? Do I need to Cancel
the
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi devs,
There are many things that could be improved in the XWiki
Administration, but for the moment I would like to discuss the
Presentation part, which is one of those most likely to be accessed by
newbies, and
Hi,
The new wizard looks very nice.
I have a suggestion for the boxes. Let's say you click on a palette, the box
appears and you make some changes to the colors. For the changes to take
place you then have to click on the X at the top right corner. I suggest
we have a Done button instead. Even
This has been discussed on IRC but I wanted to send out an email before
creating a design proposal and JIRA issue.
Summary:
Actions need to be ported out of the old core into their own components.
It is important that the new Action model be in place so that newly added
actions do not have to be
Hi Caleb,
If I understand correctly, I would be able to add a new action by
implementing an Action component with this approach (hope I'm correct).
- How will I be able to bind my action to a particular URL pattern? (like
download, view, edit actions we have right now)
- Is there a way to
Everything is very much subject to change but as it stands:
Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
Hi Caleb,
If I understand correctly, I would be able to add a new action by
implementing an Action component with this approach (hope I'm correct).
Yes, and you can piggyback off of other actions (to be
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Caleb James DeLisle
calebdeli...@lavabit.com wrote:
If you wanted to do it by writing a component implementing Action instead
of
through struts, I have the XWikiServlet working, I can commit the patch if
your
interested.
Yup, that would be nice. But I
25 matches
Mail list logo
