On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.comwrote:
[snip]
d rox.
!!! this is AWESOME!
Now one can use a mix of static and dynamic typing which is really nice
with document based databases.
Being able to script subsections of a website is also really interesting.
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 09:47:36 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Videos for my two NDC 2013 talks are now online. Generic Programming
Galore using D at http://vimeo.com/68378925 and the HipHop Virtual
Machine at http://vimeo.com/68383350.
Andrei
Reddit:
There are many cases where you do not know in advance what type
of data is being received through an interface to some other
system. This happens with some databases, and with messaging
systems, and if you are interfacing to any dynamically or weakly
typed language, such as with js/json.
I
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 22:51:57 UTC, Rob T wrote:
I suppose i could to this
c = var.get!(typeof(c));
Yeah, I did two things: int c = var.get!int; and
int c;
var v;
v.putInto(c);
[do] you think multiple alias this will solve the problem?
Maybe, but that would still be limited to a list
On 7/5/13 4:04 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
BTW I'll push another commit to jsvar.d and script.d over the weekend. I
got return/break/continue working now (in the cases I've tried at least,
simple ones).
I think you really should put the code in shape and convert your initial
post into a blog
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 03:21:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Is any of this useful for anything? idk, maybe parsing json or
maybe the script language could find use. But the real point
I'm trying to make here is simply that...
d rox.
Awesome work, and I think it's a nice code to study more
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 23:04:28 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Maybe, but that would still be limited to a list of types. What
would be ideal is if alias this or opImplicitCast existed, or
implicit constructors like C++ has for function calls and
could be a template:
T get(T)() { ...}
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 08:26:23 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
Just need a decent wrapper on phobos to fix the naming of some
stuff.
That's fairly easy too:
import arsd.jsvar;
import arsd.script;
void main() {
var globals = var.emptyObject;
{
import std.algorithm;
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 23:58:30 UTC, Rob T wrote:
What I always wanted to see, was full signature overloading
rather than only the partial signature overloading we currently
have.
Indeed, that would be pretty cool.
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 23:51:16 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
PS: I just think that var is maybe too generic, I would
called it as jsvar or anything like that, but this is just my
opinion, anyway I liked your solution.
I just wanted the authentic javascript experience :P
You could also rename it
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 23:35:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think you really should put the code in shape and convert
your initial post into a blog entry.
You know, I have a lot of things I want to blab about, but the
problem is I don't have a blog! I'm slowly working on coding one
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 00:27:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 23:35:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I think you really should put the code in shape and convert
your initial post into a blog entry.
You know, I have a lot of things I want to blab about, but the
On 7/5/2013 5:27 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 23:35:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think you really should put the code in shape and convert your initial post
into a blog entry.
You know, I have a lot of things I want to blab about, but the problem is I
don't have
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 23:53:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 01:45:24AM +0200, Mehrdad wrote:
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 22:28:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Really? I thought there are conservative GC's out there for
C++
I think you can win with both. You can have very convenient and
general abstractions like ranges which perform very well too. In
addition, you can provide all of the usual range features to make
them compatible with generic algorithms, and a few extra methods
for extra features, like changing
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 02:45:47 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 21:31:43 UTC, TommiT wrote:
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 20:43:45 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
Implementation may do other way, at first instantiate
template (with deduced type) and then try to plug arguments
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 23:53:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 01:45:24AM +0200, Mehrdad wrote:
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 22:28:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Really? I thought there are conservative GC's out there for
C++
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 23:25:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Where does the whole stronger typing comes in? This is
poppycock. We need real arguments here.
Andrei
More values typeof([]) can be implicitly converted to - weaker
typing, that simple. Actually I'd love to be able to
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 00:44:24 UTC, JS wrote:
Well, duh. Just because something works the way it works
doesn't mean it's the right or best way.
You are welcome to make a DIP and try to prove that your proposed
alternative is better. Chance of success is low but it is
possible.
In the
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 23:52:35 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Where does the whole stronger typing comes in? This is
poppycock. We need real arguments here.
Maybe it's a matter of definitions, for me having null as
literal for empty array, null pointer, empty associative
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 08:15:35 UTC, Nicolas Sicard wrote:
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 23:52:35 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Where does the whole stronger typing comes in? This is
poppycock. We need real arguments here.
Maybe it's a matter of definitions, for me having
On Friday, July 05, 2013 09:58:24 Dicebot wrote:
In the meanwhile I find the current system really well-designed
and consistent.
Agreed.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:15:08 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
04-Jul-2013 19:00, Regan Heath пишет:
In fact, you can generalise further.
The meaning of if(x) is compare the value of x with 0 (in C, C++, ..
).
The value of x for a pointer is the address to which it
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 19:15:09 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
04-Jul-2013 19:00, Regan Heath пишет:
In fact, you can generalise further.
The meaning of if(x) is compare the value of x with 0 (in C,
C++, .. ).
The value of x for a pointer is the address to which it points.
The value of x
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 18:26:09 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Why do you want so much an empty array that's not null? I can't make
sense of this entire argument.
Suppose you have a web page, suppose it has a text field on it called
comment. Suppose you load
05-Jul-2013 13:01, TommiT пишет:
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 19:15:09 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
04-Jul-2013 19:00, Regan Heath пишет:
In fact, you can generalise further.
The meaning of if(x) is compare the value of x with 0 (in C, C++,
.. ).
The value of x for a pointer is the address to
05-Jul-2013 12:55, Regan Heath пишет:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:15:08 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
04-Jul-2013 19:00, Regan Heath пишет:
In fact, you can generalise further.
The meaning of if(x) is compare the value of x with 0 (in C, C++,
.. ).
The value of x for a
On Friday, July 05, 2013 11:01:17 TommiT wrote:
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 19:15:09 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
04-Jul-2013 19:00, Regan Heath пишет:
In fact, you can generalise further.
The meaning of if(x) is compare the value of x with 0 (in C,
C++, .. ).
The value of x for a
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 10:13:11 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
05-Jul-2013 12:55, Regan Heath пишет:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:15:08 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
04-Jul-2013 19:00, Regan Heath пишет:
In fact, you can generalise further.
The meaning
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 10:17:02 +0100, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Friday, July 05, 2013 11:01:17 TommiT wrote:
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 19:15:09 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
04-Jul-2013 19:00, Regan Heath пишет:
In fact, you can generalise further.
The meaning of
On Friday, July 05, 2013 10:26:09 Regan Heath wrote:
I think it is simpler to think of arrays as a struct with 2 members (ptr
and length) and this struct is/as a value type. Then it all simply makes
sense.
I'm not saying that it can't be understood. It's just that the semantics are a
bit
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 20:27 +0200, bearophile wrote:
[…]
Yet in Python they are used everywhere. I define input ranges
often in D and I think they are useful.
Having a built-in yield in a language is quite handy. Take a
look at the Python and the second D solutions here:
I have a request to add to __traits to check if a method/property
of a class/struct is actually implemented or not.
interface A { void myfunc(); }
class B : A { } // myfunc not implemented
class C : A { void myfunc() { ... } // myfunc implemented
This may seem odd but I need it for
On 2013-07-03 03:42, Daniel Murphy wrote:
You should probably try using template mixins, if all you need to do is
expand some code.
I don't think that works so well together with ddoc comments. Ideally
you should be able to do something like this:
class Foo
{
/// Get/set bar
mixin
05-Jul-2013 13:24, Regan Heath пишет:
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 10:13:11 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
05-Jul-2013 12:55, Regan Heath пишет:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:15:08 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
04-Jul-2013 19:00, Regan Heath пишет:
In fact, you
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 10:39:38 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
05-Jul-2013 13:24, Regan Heath пишет:
Given those statements I have come to the conclusion that if
(x) on an
array should compare x.ptr to 0.
I'd agree if arrays did decay to pointers or integers on demand
(implicit
On 2013-07-05 11:52, JS wrote:
I have a request to add to __traits to check if a method/property of a
class/struct is actually implemented or not.
interface A { void myfunc(); }
class B : A { } // myfunc not implemented
class C : A { void myfunc() { ... } // myfunc implemented
This may seem
Hi D community,
I was just playing with some code and encountered a problem:
```
struct Foo(alias T)
{
void call() { T(); }
}
struct Bar
{
void fun() {}
}
struct Baz(T)
{
void fun(U)() {}
}
void main()
{
auto b = Bar();
auto f = Foo!(delegate{b.fun();})(); // this works
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:kr673g$179s$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2013-07-03 03:42, Daniel Murphy wrote:
You should probably try using template mixins, if all you need to do is
expand some code.
I don't think that works so well together with ddoc comments. Ideally you
On 07/05/13 12:39, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
05-Jul-2013 13:24, Regan Heath пишет:
1. Arrays are a thin wrapper around a reference type (ptr) which add
safety.
Rather it packs 2 pointers (pair: ptr, ptr+len), modeling the region in
between.
No matter how we look at it, it doesn't overlap
On 7/5/13, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
I don't think that works so well together with ddoc comments. Ideally
you should be able to do something like this:
class Foo
{
/// Get/set bar
mixin property!(int, bar);
}
Related:
On 07/04/13 20:27, bearophile wrote:
Having a built-in yield in a language is quite handy. Take a look at the
Python and the second D solutions here:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Same_Fringe
Would tuples really be the ideal tree representation when dealing
with mutable data in /real/ code?
On 07/05/13 14:26, Artur Skawina wrote:
Actually, slices should implicitly convert to bool with !!length.
Normal pointers couldn't do that - because they had no length.
s/implicitly//
artur
TommiT tommitiss...@hotmail.com wrote in message
news:cajkpllpdchpphqxh...@forum.dlang.org...
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 13:32:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:52:12 -0400, Regan Heath wrote:
Indeed. IMO if(arr) should mean if(arr.ptr) .. and I thought it did..
or
On Monday, 1 July 2013 at 01:35:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I believe that the way that this sort of enhancement has
typically been suggested
Oh hey, I remember the DIP23 madness. Is it that time again
already?
is to do something like
public @property int value;
Yes. Please, yes.
On 07/05/2013 03:53 PM, Wyatt wrote:
On Monday, 1 July 2013 at 01:35:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I believe that the way that this sort of enhancement has typically
been suggested
Oh hey, I remember the DIP23 madness. Is it that time again already?
is to do something like
public
On 4 July 2013 22:03, Mehrdad wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
D, on the other hand, has a GC built into the language itself; it's not an
implementation detail.
I'd say built into the runtime, rather than language. And it is an
implementation detail on just how the GC tracks, allocates and
collects
On 4 July 2013 22:04, Mehrdad wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
To put it another way, _any_ conformant D compiler must necessarily have a
GC.
Not necessarily true, but your application at runtime may leak surplus
amounts of memory from hidden allocation calls without a GC. ;)
--
Iain Buclaw
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 11:23:55 UTC, Mohammad Sadegh Khoeini
wrote:
// auto u = Foo!(b.fun)(); // doesn't work: vaiable b
cannot be read at compile time
// auto v = Foo!(Baz!int.fun!int)(); //doesn't work: this
for fun needs to be type Baz not type Foo!(fun)
Not a bug, I think at
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:39:37 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
05-Jul-2013 13:24, Regan Heath пишет:
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 10:13:11 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
05-Jul-2013 12:55, Regan Heath пишет:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:15:08 +0100, Dmitry
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 10:55:26 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-07-05 11:52, JS wrote:
I have a request to add to __traits to check if a
method/property of a
class/struct is actually implemented or not.
interface A { void myfunc(); }
class B : A { } // myfunc not implemented
class C :
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 23:28:41 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 21:48:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/2/2013 1:47 PM, TommiT wrote:
Division operator for strings doesn't make any sense,
That's why overloading / to do something completely unrelated
to division is
Am 05.07.2013 16:59, schrieb TommiT:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 23:28:41 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 21:48:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/2/2013 1:47 PM, TommiT wrote:
Division operator for strings doesn't make any sense,
That's why overloading / to do something
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 15:04:44 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 05.07.2013 16:59, schrieb TommiT:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 23:28:41 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 21:48:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/2/2013 1:47 PM, TommiT wrote:
Division operator for strings doesn't
On 7/5/13, JS js.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a request to add to __traits to check if a method/property
of a class/struct is actually implemented or not.
interface A { void myfunc(); }
class B : A { } // myfunc not implemented
class C : A { void myfunc() { ... } // myfunc implemented
On 7/5/13 7:05 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 11:23:55 UTC, Mohammad Sadegh Khoeini wrote:
// auto u = Foo!(b.fun)(); // doesn't work: vaiable b cannot be
read at compile time
// auto v = Foo!(Baz!int.fun!int)(); //doesn't work: this for fun
needs to be type Baz not
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 15:17:09 UTC, Mohammad Sadegh Khoeini
wrote:
However, the gotchas like that will surprise people.
Aye, I have fought with it before and never made a good solution.
The problem is that b can change at runtime, so it has no way of
knowing for sure which object it
05-Jul-2013 16:26, Artur Skawina пишет:
On 07/05/13 12:39, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
05-Jul-2013 13:24, Regan Heath пишет:
1. Arrays are a thin wrapper around a reference type (ptr) which add
safety.
Rather it packs 2 pointers (pair: ptr, ptr+len), modeling the region in between.
No matter how
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 14:59:19 UTC, JS wrote:
This doesn't work with overloaded members. It's possible that a
function with the same name may be completely unrelated to the
interface being implemented.
There's a trait for that as well. Read the documentation.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:04:46PM +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 05.07.2013 16:59, schrieb TommiT:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 23:28:41 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 21:48:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/2/2013 1:47 PM, TommiT wrote:
Division operator for strings
On 7/5/13 2:05 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 18:26:09 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Why do you want so much an empty array that's not null? I can't make
sense of this entire argument.
Suppose you have a web page, suppose it has a text field on it
On 07/05/2013 02:52 AM, JS wrote:
I have a request to add to __traits to check if a method/property of a
class/struct is actually implemented or not.
interface A { void myfunc(); }
class B : A { } // myfunc not implemented
class C : A { void myfunc() { ... } // myfunc implemented
This may
On 7/5/2013 9:17 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Python uses +.
There's much historical precedence for + meaning concatenation, and much
historical experience with the resulting ambiguity. The famous example is:
123 + 4
? In D, the canonical problem is:
int[] array;
array + 4
Does
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 16:04:19 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 14:59:19 UTC, JS wrote:
This doesn't work with overloaded members. It's possible that
a function with the same name may be completely unrelated to
the interface being implemented.
There's a trait for
I ripped and hacked up some code from typecons that allows one to
implement an interface automatically by redirecting it to a
variable implementing the interface.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/209e260b
To see the effectiveness of the code, notice that very little, if
any, boilerplate code needs to
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 14:59:39 UTC, TommiT wrote:
It's rather C++'s std::string which overloads the meaning of +
to mean concatenation. I wonder if some other programming
language has assigned some other symbol (than ~) to mean
concatenation. I guess math uses || for it.
|| is used for a
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:44:43AM -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/5/2013 9:17 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Python uses +.
There's much historical precedence for + meaning concatenation, and
much historical experience with the resulting ambiguity.
Which leads to some nasty situations in
On Friday, July 05, 2013 16:59:38 TommiT wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 23:28:41 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 21:48:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/2/2013 1:47 PM, TommiT wrote:
Division operator for strings doesn't make any sense,
That's why overloading /
Most languages I've used use + for concatenating strings, so it
was definitely
surprising to me that D didn't. I have no problem with the fact
that it has a
specific operator for concatenation (and there are some good
reasons for it),
but + seems to be pretty standard across languages from what
On 07/05/2013 09:43 PM, Namespace wrote:
Most languages I've used use + for concatenating strings, so it was
definitely
surprising to me that D didn't. I have no problem with the fact that
it has a
specific operator for concatenation (and there are some good reasons
for it),
but + seems to be
Unary ~ is bitwise not in Java and D, and he is referring to
binary usage.
[...] use ~ for _any_ purpose.
I'd expected that *any* really means *any* and do not refer to
binary.
On Friday, July 05, 2013 22:09:53 Namespace wrote:
Unary ~ is bitwise not in Java and D, and he is referring to
binary usage.
[...] use ~ for _any_ purpose.
I'd expected that *any* really means *any* and do not refer to
binary.
I did mean any, not just binary. I thought that there
On 07/05/2013 10:34 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Namespace wrote:
Unary ~ is bitwise not in Java and D, and he is referring to binary
usage.
[...] use ~ for _any_ purpose.
I'd expected that *any* really means *any* and do not refer to binary.
Yes. Neither do 'use', 'for'
On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Namespace wrote:
Unary ~ is bitwise not in Java and D, and he is referring to binary
usage.
[...] use ~ for _any_ purpose.
I'd expected that *any* really means *any* and do not refer to binary.
Yes. Neither do 'use', 'for' and 'purpose'. Establishing that it is
On Friday, July 05, 2013 22:34:57 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:34 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Namespace wrote:
Unary ~ is bitwise not in Java and D, and he is referring to binary
usage.
[...] use ~ for _any_ purpose.
I'd expected that *any* really means
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 20:34:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Namespace wrote:
Unary ~ is bitwise not in Java and D, and he is referring to
binary
usage.
[...] use ~ for _any_ purpose.
I'd expected that *any* really means *any* and do not refer to
binary.
Yes. Neither
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 18:18:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
It doesn't necessarily have to be ~, as long as it's something
other
than + (or any other numerical binary operator). Perl uses '.',
but in
D's case, that would be a bad idea, since you'd have ambiguity
in:
Perl is my day job and I've
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 16:22:12 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/5/13 2:05 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
Why? Because if it were null it would have a different
meaning. It would
mean that the comment field was not present on the page at
all, and
should not be altered.
I find the example
On Friday, July 05, 2013 22:46:59 Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 20:34:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Namespace wrote:
Unary ~ is bitwise not in Java and D, and he is referring to
binary
usage.
[...] use ~ for _any_ purpose.
I'd expected that *any*
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 17:53:11 UTC, JS wrote:
I ripped and hacked up some code from typecons that allows one
to implement an interface automatically by redirecting it to a
variable implementing the interface.
How about splitting up the implementation of AutoImplement into a
template
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 22:33:01 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 17:53:11 UTC, JS wrote:
I ripped and hacked up some code from typecons that allows one
to implement an interface automatically by redirecting it to a
variable implementing the interface.
How about
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 03:30:07PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, July 05, 2013 22:46:59 Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 20:34:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Namespace wrote:
Unary ~ is bitwise not in Java and D, and he is referring to
binary
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 22:33:01 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
The new wrap from std.typecons
Yikes... I'm a native english speaker and pretty confident with D
but I can't get my head around what wrap does. It looks
suspiciously like the docs were written by a Russian (missing
articles
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:54:37AM +0200, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 22:33:01 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
The new wrap from std.typecons
Yikes... I'm a native english speaker and pretty confident with D
but I can't get my head around what wrap does. It looks suspiciously
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 22:49:40 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
How to even remotely model such a thought process in a machine
is an
extremely hard problem indeed!
I would posit (being a machine learning guy myself to some
extent, although not natural language) that it's only an
interesting
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 22:54:38 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 22:33:01 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
The new wrap from std.typecons
Yikes... I'm a native english speaker and pretty confident with
D but I can't get my head around what wrap does. It looks
suspiciously
It's looks like he modify a source code from std.typecons
(something like class AutoImplement?) and a new thing called
wrap was created.
Like two fingers on the asphalt)
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 22:43:06 UTC, JS wrote:
std.typecon has a lot of goodies in it but it seems to
re-implement much of the same functionality in many of the
templates.
I agree, it would be nice if it would be broken up into smaller,
reusable pieces that would also be usable from user
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 01:42:06 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
You should probably try using template mixins, if all you need
to do is
expand some code.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1294
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 23:22:23 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 22:43:06 UTC, JS wrote:
std.typecon has a lot of goodies in it but it seems to
re-implement much of the same functionality in many of the
templates.
I agree, it would be nice if it would be broken up
Hi all.
I recently downloaded and installed version 2.063.2, but now I
see the current version is listed as 2.063. Is this is an error?
Also, does anyone know if a new edition of The D Programming
Language is planned in the relatively near future?
Thanks,
Caitlin
On Saturday, July 06, 2013 03:22:57 Caitlin wrote:
Hi all.
I recently downloaded and installed version 2.063.2, but now I
see the current version is listed as 2.063. Is this is an error?
The current release is 2.063.2, but it's the first time that we've actually
released point releases like
Hi. It's time for the annual poll of the year. Please vote
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=51d766e4e4b03d6de547a64b
Okay, so I feel like this should be possible, but I can't make it work...
I want to use template deduction to deduce the argument type, but I want
the function arg to be Unqual!T of the deduced type, rather than the
verbatim type of the argument given.
I've tried: void f(T : Unqual!U, U)(T a) {}
Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.1752.1373074509.13711.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Okay, so I feel like this should be possible, but I can't make it work...
I want to use template deduction to deduce the argument type, but I want
the function arg to be Unqual!T of the
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 01:35:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
Okay, so I feel like this should be possible, but I can't make
it work...
I want to use template deduction to deduce the argument type,
but I want
the function arg to be Unqual!T of the deduced type, rather
than the
verbatim type of the
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 01:35:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
Okay, so I feel like this should be possible, but I can't make
it work...
I don't think D's IFTI allows different argument and parameter
types...
I think this is possible with a proxy function (a function that
accepts arguments with any
On 07/06/2013 03:34 AM, Manu wrote:
Okay, so I feel like this should be possible, but I can't make it work...
I want to use template deduction to deduce the argument type, but I want
the function arg to be Unqual!T of the deduced type, rather than the
verbatim type of the argument given.
I've
On 6/26/13, Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org wrote:
Am 25.06.2013 20:29, schrieb Walter Bright:
Any projects using AddRef() and Release()?
I'm currently using it for Direct2D and Direct3D 9/10/11. Also, I have
an MIDL - D translator for WinRT and plan to make a language
projection for
On 6 July 2013 11:41, Daniel Murphy yebbl...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.1752.1373074509.13711.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Okay, so I feel like this should be possible, but I can't make it work...
I want to use template deduction to
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
