Seems like vibe.d runs a blog http://vibed.org/blog/ doesn't it
suit you?
On 7/7/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
While doing some unrelated research I stumbled upon my very first email
to Walter, dated April 26, 2004.
That's a cool teaser, but how did the discussion continue? :)
Am Sat, 06 Jul 2013 20:02:16 -0700
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
* The venerable typeof
check
* For a class, enumerate all of its members, and figure out their
attributes (protection level, static or not, type...)
check
* For a module/namespace, enumerate
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 03:03:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Terrible. If you have conditionals, iteration, functions, and
objects
in D's straight programming support, you should have
conditionals,
iteration, functions, and objects in D's metalanguage.
:-(
template allSatisfy(alias F,
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 03:03:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/26/04 6:54 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was bitching to myself and then together with a friend
(e-meet
[...]) about how hard it is to do metaprogramming in C++. He
mentioned D is much better at it, and we browsed the
On 07/07/2013 02:27 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
...
We're almost there with CTFE, but CTFE can only run functions that could
run at runtime. In a crazy world where types were first class objects,
stuff like this would be feasible. Or perhaps we just need a
compile-time metalanguage that allows
On 07/07/13 14:27, Peter Alexander wrote:
template allSatisfy(alias F, T...)
{
static if (T.length == 0)
{
enum allSatisfy = true;
}
else static if (T.length == 1)
{
enum allSatisfy = F!(T[0]);
}
else
{
enum allSatisfy =
On 7/7/13, Peter Alexander peter.alexander...@gmail.com wrote:
Still looks like half-assed functional programming to me.
Yep I agree.
Where's the iteration? Why can't I write this?
template allSatisfy(alias F, T...) {
foreach(t; T)
if (!F!(t))
return false;
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 13:20:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/07/2013 02:27 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
...
We're almost there with CTFE, but CTFE can only run functions
that could
run at runtime. In a crazy world where types were first class
objects,
stuff like this would be feasible. Or
I had some free time so I decided I should start a simple blog
about D, implementing some unix utilities. I've (unsurprisingly)
started with echo.
http://foreach-hour-life.blogspot.co.uk/
It's nothing ground-breaking, but every little helps :)
On 7/7/13 8:00 AM, John Colvin wrote:
I had some free time so I decided I should start a simple blog about D,
implementing some unix utilities. I've (unsurprisingly) started with echo.
http://foreach-hour-life.blogspot.co.uk/
It's nothing ground-breaking, but every little helps :)
Nice idea!
On 7/7/13 8:55 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Here's a conformant implementation for reference:
http://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/src/pkg/echo/echo.c
Hmm, that's actually not so good, it doesn't ensure that I/O was
successful. Anyhow, here's a possibility:
import std.stdout;
void
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 15:55:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/7/13 8:00 AM, John Colvin wrote:
I had some free time so I decided I should start a simple blog
about D,
implementing some unix utilities. I've (unsurprisingly)
started with echo.
http://foreach-hour-life.blogspot.co.uk/
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 16:06:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/7/13 8:55 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Here's a conformant implementation for reference:
http://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/src/pkg/echo/echo.c
Hmm, that's actually not so good, it doesn't ensure that I/O
was
On 7/7/13 10:08 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 16:06:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/7/13 8:55 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Here's a conformant implementation for reference:
http://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/src/pkg/echo/echo.c
Hmm, that's actually not so good,
On Sun, 07 Jul 2013 15:23:03 +0200
Artur Skawina art.08...@gmail.com wrote:
template allSatisfy(alias F, T...) {
enum allSatisfy = {
foreach (E; T)
if (!F!E)
return false;
return true;
}();
}
// And no, it isn't perfect. But not /that/ much is
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 7 de July a las 09:06 me escribiste:
On 7/7/13 8:55 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Here's a conformant implementation for reference:
http://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/src/pkg/echo/echo.c
Hmm, that's actually not so good, it doesn't ensure that I/O was
successful.
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 12:27:02 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 03:03:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Terrible. If you have conditionals, iteration, functions, and
objects
in D's straight programming support, you should have
conditionals,
iteration, functions, and
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 20:08:19 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 7 de July a las 09:06 me escribiste:
On 7/7/13 8:55 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Here's a conformant implementation for reference:
http://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/src/pkg/echo/echo.c
Hmm, that's
On 7/7/2013 5:09 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 7/7/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
While doing some unrelated research I stumbled upon my very first email
to Walter, dated April 26, 2004.
That's a cool teaser, but how did the discussion continue? :)
Generally
Not sure this is common knowledge, as am still getting questions
/ propositions off people for this. Through collaboration of the
gcc maintainers at Debian/Ubuntu, gdc has been merged in with the
gcc source package, and is available for all architectures
supported by Debian (albeit, with the
Awesome! Would be great to see on the official Arch repos! :)
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 03:03:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* And if you really want to go meta, define metacode that can
take
an AST node as a parameter and can visit the AST and figure
out what
each node is. That would allow things such as loop fusion and
other
advanced stuff. But
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 23:11:26 UTC, Manu wrote:
[..] I feel like it would be a much cleaner solution than any of
the others presented in this thread...
I think Artur's solution is the cleanest one because it changes
the default behaviour to a more sensible one: it is useful to
keep the
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 22:25:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/5/2013 3:48 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
For example, consider the sentence he's such an office
Romeo!. It's
relatively easy to parse -- no convoluted nested subordinate
clauses or
anything tricky like that. But it's extremely
On 7 July 2013 16:02, TommiT tommitiss...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 23:11:26 UTC, Manu wrote:
[..] I feel like it would be a much cleaner solution than any of
the others presented in this thread...
I think Artur's solution is the cleanest one because it changes the
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 14:08:20 -0700
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
I resisted upgrading to a smartphone for many years (people used
to laugh at me for carrying around such a prehistoric antique -- to a
point I took pride in showing it off to the kids), until the battery
life started
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 15:24 +0200, mike james wrote:
The current release is 2.063.2, but it's the first time that
we've actually
released point releases like that, so there are likely to be
places saying
2.063 instead of 2.063.2.
Maybe it's time to make the odd-numbered releases the
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 21:09:59 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
but I found that I *still* have to recharge once a day 'cos of
the battery drain from all those advanced features that were
never
there in the old phone. Sigh...
I heard, wifi consumes the lion share of battery charge, try to
On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 08:13 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[…]
Y'know, I've always found correct-as-you-type features extremely
annoying. I encountered it first in MS Word, and it annoyed me so much I
crawled back into my Vim cave. :-P When I upgraded to a smartphone, I
decided to give it an honest
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 09:38 +0200, Kagamin wrote:
[…]
I heard, wifi consumes the lion share of battery charge, try to
disable it.
WiFi can be a big battery drain, but so is the screen, and (perhaps most
importantly) the mobile aerial. The second of these is perhaps obvious,
the first and third
On 7/6/2013 11:11 PM, TommiT wrote:
I can see machine translation that is based on statistical correlation with a
sufficiently large corpus of human translations, but I don't see much hope for
actual understanding of non-literal speech in the foreseeable future, and I'm
actually rather glad of
On 7/7/13 1:26 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/6/2013 11:11 PM, TommiT wrote:
I can see machine translation that is based on statistical
correlation with a
sufficiently large corpus of human translations, but I don't see much
hope for
actual understanding of non-literal speech in the foreseeable
On 07/07/13 08:22, Manu wrote:
On 7 July 2013 16:02, TommiT tommitiss...@hotmail.com
mailto:tommitiss...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 23:11:26 UTC, Manu wrote:
[..] I feel like it would be a much cleaner solution than any of
the others presented in
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 06:22:17 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 7 July 2013 16:02, TommiT tommitiss...@hotmail.com wrote:
I think Artur's solution is the cleanest one [..]
Maybe so, but I just have my suspicions that it will never fly,
and I think a solution here is actually pretty important.
You
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 08:26:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/6/2013 11:11 PM, TommiT wrote:
I can see machine translation that is based on statistical
correlation with a
sufficiently large corpus of human translations, but I don't
see much hope for
actual understanding of non-literal
On 7/7/2013 2:16 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 08:26:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/6/2013 11:11 PM, TommiT wrote:
I can see machine translation that is based on statistical correlation with a
sufficiently large corpus of human translations, but I don't see much hope for
On 7/7/2013 1:30 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:26 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/6/2013 11:11 PM, TommiT wrote:
I can see machine translation that is based on statistical
correlation with a
sufficiently large corpus of human translations, but I don't see much
hope for
actual
Am Sat, 6 Jul 2013 20:24:41 +1000
schrieb Manu turkey...@gmail.com:
On 6 July 2013 18:23, Namespace rswhi...@googlemail.com wrote:
That doesn't do what I want at all. The signature is still f(T) not
f(Unqual!T).
For non-const, const and immutable inout would do it.
void
It has been mooted that we actually formally release 2.0.6 of the Emacs
D Mode. It has also been mooted that __vector is now an official part of
D and should be highlighted accordingly.
Is __vector part of D? If so what type of thing is it?
Thanks.
--
Russel.
Am Sun, 7 Jul 2013 00:06:26 +1000
schrieb Manu turkey...@gmail.com:
On 6 July 2013 22:27, Namespace rswhi...@googlemail.com wrote:
The way that makes the most sense to me is:
void f(T)(Unqual!T t) {}
Given an immutable(T) for instance that I want to call with, it would
instantiate
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 11:07:44 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Sat, 6 Jul 2013 20:24:41 +1000
schrieb Manu turkey...@gmail.com:
On 6 July 2013 18:23, Namespace rswhi...@googlemail.com
wrote:
That doesn't do what I want at all. The signature is still
f(T) not
f(Unqual!T).
For
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 10:07:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/7/2013 2:16 AM, John Colvin wrote:
One word: Watson.
Ask Watson what its favorite color is.
Oh well.
That would require self-awareness. But self-awareness is not a
requirement of understanding natural language as long as
Am Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:10:24 +0200
schrieb Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv:
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 15:05:51 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
...
It is not that simple. Consider:
void f(T)(T t)
{
static if (T == Unqual!T)
// one function body
else
// completely different
Am Sun, 07 Jul 2013 01:04:52 +0400
schrieb Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com:
I've seen an aggressive proposal back in the day to just do a shallow
unqual on all aggregates passed by value.
I came to the same conclusion. If feasible, type inference
should always produce tail-const
Am Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:24:23 +0200
schrieb Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv:
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 01:35:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
...
If this is about template bloat I think much better is to address
problem in general. For example, internal linkage or strict
export requirements - anything
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 11:11:54 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Is __vector part of D?
Yep, it's officially in the list of keywords and in the language
spec.
If so what type of thing is it?
It's kind of a type constructor, like const, shared, etc., so I'd
put it in that category for syntax
Am Sun, 07 Jul 2013 13:17:23 +0200
schrieb TommiT tommitiss...@hotmail.com:
const would have the same effect:
void f(T)(const T var) { ... }
...but then you can't mutate var.
That doesn't handle shared.
--
Marco
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 06:58:29 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
Ironically, this isn't helpful. H. S. Teoh is opening up a
discussion, not reporting a bug.
The problem here is more general than this specific case. Any
template constraint on any function could fail
Sometimes you need to have some extra data to check against in
the assert expression. That data isn't needed in release mode
when assertions are ignored. Therefore, you put that extra data
inside a version(assert). But then those assertions fail to
compile in release mode because the symbol
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 11:59:36 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Sun, 07 Jul 2013 13:17:23 +0200
schrieb TommiT tommitiss...@hotmail.com:
const would have the same effect:
void f(T)(const T var) { ... }
...but then you can't mutate var.
That doesn't handle shared.
That seems like a compiler
On 7/7/13, Tommi tommitiss...@hotmail.com wrote:
Sometimes you need to have some extra data to check against in
the assert expression. That data isn't needed in release mode
when assertions are ignored. Therefore, you put that extra data
inside a version(assert). But then those assertions fail
06-Jul-2013 05:34, Manu пишет:
Okay, so I feel like this should be possible, but I can't make it work...
I want to use template deduction to deduce the argument type, but I want
the function arg to be Unqual!T of the deduced type, rather than the
verbatim type of the argument given.
I've tried:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 10:07:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/7/2013 2:16 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 08:26:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/6/2013 11:11 PM, TommiT wrote:
I can see machine translation that is based on statistical
correlation with a
sufficiently
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 12:30:28 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I've ran into an issue when implementing this feature back in
February
(see the pull request):
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9450
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1614
WTF:
Hmm.. I think we
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 12:30:28 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 7/7/13, Tommi tommitiss...@hotmail.com wrote:
Sometimes you need to have some extra data to check against in
the assert expression. That data isn't needed in release mode
when assertions are ignored. Therefore, you put that extra
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 13:12:06 UTC, Tommi wrote:
[..] Then, when parsing assert expressions, if an undefined
symbol is found, the compiler would check that separate list of
symbols that it has been keeping, and if the symbol is found
there and use of the symbol is syntactically correct,
On 6 July 2013 22:41, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 06, 2013 14:13:29 H. S. Teoh wrote:
Shouldn't the frame pointer be generated only if f() actually tries to
access something outside of the definition of T?
Probably, but that's arguably an optimization.
07.07.2013 17:12, Tommi пишет:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 12:30:28 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 7/7/13, Tommi tommitiss...@hotmail.com wrote:
Sometimes you need to have some extra data to check against in
the assert expression. That data isn't needed in release mode
when assertions are
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 13:12:06 UTC, Tommi wrote:
But would it be possible to implement it something like:
[..]
Although, I don't know if the best possible behaviour is to
silently compile the following assert out of existence in release
mode:
version (assert)
{
enum cond = false;
}
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 13:42:52 UTC, Tommi wrote:
Then, yet another solution (a code breaking one) would be to
make it so that only literally saying:
assert(0);
or
assert(false);
or
assert(null);
...would exhibit that special assert behaviour.
Anything else would be semantically
On 7/7/13 3:07 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/7/2013 1:30 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:26 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/6/2013 11:11 PM, TommiT wrote:
I can see machine translation that is based on statistical
correlation with a
sufficiently large corpus of human translations,
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 13:53 +0200, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 11:11:54 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Is __vector part of D?
Yep, it's officially in the list of keywords and in the language
spec.
If so what type of thing is it?
It's kind of a type constructor, like
On 07/06/2013 02:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 23:48:40 -0700
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 06, 2013 08:36:31 Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Typing replies on a smartphone seems to carry a bit of a cost in
textual accuracy :-(
Typing on
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 17:37:37 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
Please, I still have a physical keyboard on my new smartphone.
Put your money where your mouth is.
I must admit it becomes increasingly harder to find ones. I am
not ware of a single new model that has both physical keyboard
and less
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 18:54:16 UTC, TommiT wrote:
He's talking about changing the semantics only on POD types,
like int, struct of ints, static array of ints... only types
that can implicitly convert from immutable to mutable.
Than it does not really solve anything. Have you measured
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 17:37:37 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 07/06/2013 02:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Anyway, typing on a mobile device was more or less a solved
problem
until that sack of shit Steve Jobs moronically convinced
everyone that
physical buttons and styluses were bad things
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 17:44:20 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 17:37:37 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
Please, I still have a physical keyboard on my new smartphone.
Put your money where your mouth is.
I must admit it becomes increasingly harder to find ones. I am
not ware of a
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 17:56:58 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I guess none of them count as that new though.
Yeah, Android 2.3 has some legacy smell :) Looks nice, wish they
released something similar but with fresh h/w and OS. Still may
work with some cyanogen magic, thanks!
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 17:44:20 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I must admit it becomes increasingly harder to find ones. I am
not ware of a single new model that has both physical keyboard
and less than 4.5 screen. Any hints?
Blackberry Q10 = 3.1 with 720 x 720 resolution:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 18:09:24 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
Blackberry Q10 = 3.1 with 720 x 720 resolution:
Any piece of hardware I can't install some custom tweaked OS on
is not an option and RIM attitude has always sucked hard in that
regard. That is not something I will support with my
Am 06.07.2013 05:00, schrieb Andrej Mitrovic:
On 6/26/13, Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org wrote:
Am 25.06.2013 20:29, schrieb Walter Bright:
Any projects using AddRef() and Release()?
I'm currently using it for Direct2D and Direct3D 9/10/11. Also, I have
an MIDL - D translator for
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 17:48:17 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 6 July 2013 at 18:54:16 UTC, TommiT wrote:
He's talking about changing the semantics only on POD types,
like int, struct of ints, static array of ints... only types
that can implicitly convert from immutable to mutable.
Than
On 7/7/2013 8:38 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
All Siri does is recognize a set of stock patterns, just like Eliza.
Step out of that, even slightly, and it reverts to a default, again,
just like Eliza.
Of course, Siri had a much larger set of patterns it recognized, but
with a bit of
On 7/7/2013 5:41 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 10:07:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ask Watson what its favorite color is.
Oh well.
That's asking for an awful lot more than good natural language processing.
Is it? Yes, that's a serious question. I don't presume that human
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 20:38:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/7/2013 5:41 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 10:07:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ask Watson what its favorite color is.
Oh well.
That's asking for an awful lot more than good natural language
processing.
Is
On Sunday, July 07, 2013 14:30:12 Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 6 July 2013 22:41, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 06, 2013 14:13:29 H. S. Teoh wrote:
Shouldn't the frame pointer be generated only if f() actually tries to
access something outside of the definition of
On Sunday, July 07, 2013 13:38:33 Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/7/2013 5:41 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 10:07:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ask Watson what its favorite color is.
Oh well.
That's asking for an awful lot more than good natural language processing.
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 10:07:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ask Watson what its favorite color is.
Ask /me/ what my favorite color is. I always hate questions like
that because, and this might sound silly, but it bothers me
because if I pick one, I think the others will feel left out, and
On 7/7/13 1:35 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
A mailman can (will) also do things like pretend to know, make up a
plausible answer, ask clarifying questions, figure it out, etc.
Siri can also reply by doing a google search and reading the result.
Computers don't, for example, figure it out. They
On 7/7/2013 2:11 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:35 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
A mailman can (will) also do things like pretend to know, make up a
plausible answer, ask clarifying questions, figure it out, etc.
Siri can also reply by doing a google search and reading the result.
On 7/7/2013 2:05 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 10:07:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ask Watson what its favorite color is.
Ask /me/ what my favorite color is. I always hate questions like that because,
and this might sound silly, but it bothers me because if I pick one, I
On 7/7/13 2:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
This started with you claiming that Siri is just Eliza with more
memory. That's
inaccurate to say the least.
I argue it is dead on. I don't see a fundamental difference.
Consider someone at a 1970s level of compiler technology coming to you
and
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 02:38:15AM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 14:08:20 -0700
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
I resisted upgrading to a smartphone for many years (people used
to laugh at me for carrying around such a prehistoric antique -- to
a point I took
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 04:03:39PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/7/13 2:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
This started with you claiming that Siri is just Eliza with more
memory. That's
inaccurate to say the least.
I argue it is dead on. I don't see a fundamental difference.
Consider
On 7/7/2013 4:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Similarly, it would be an ignorant thing to say that Siri is just a larger
Eliza. There is a world of difference between Eliza's and Siri's approaches. In
fact the difference is even larger than between 1970s compilers and today's
ones.
I don't
On 7 July 2013 22:31, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
06-Jul-2013 05:34, Manu пишет:
Okay, so I feel like this should be possible, but I can't make it work...
I want to use template deduction to deduce the argument type, but I want
the function arg to be Unqual!T of the deduced
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.comwrote:
On 7/7/2013 4:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Similarly, it would be an ignorant thing to say that Siri is just a larger
Eliza. There is a world of difference between Eliza's and Siri's
approaches. In
fact the
On 07/07/2013 01:19 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
If you wanted to save on template instantiations for every
possible attribute combination, you are doing it wrong. Those
are already 3 duplicate templates with binary identical
functions foo(int a) in them, which makes me cry on the inside.
There is a
On 7/7/13 6:11 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/7/2013 4:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Similarly, it would be an ignorant thing to say that Siri is just a
larger
Eliza. There is a world of difference between Eliza's and Siri's
approaches. In
fact the difference is even larger than between
I have a partial fix for issues 8435 and 10118, but it's being blocked
by issue 10567. Basically, the problem is that opCmp *must* be declared
as:
struct T {
int opCmp(ref const T t) const { ... }
}
Only when it's declared this way, will T's typeinfo.compare pick
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 09:44:59PM -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I have a partial fix for issues 8435 and 10118, but it's being blocked
by issue 10567. Basically, the problem is that opCmp *must* be
declared as:
struct T {
int opCmp(ref const T t) const { ... }
}
On Sunday, July 07, 2013 22:13:59 H. S. Teoh wrote:
since due
to the bug that we can't have both a template and non-template method of
the same name
I believe that Kenji fixed that bug recently.
- Jonathan M Davis
On 07/06/13 21:39, Max Strakhov wrote:
If anyine has any ideas how make this implementation simplier, bring it on :)
Well, you could just use the pseudo-code version that you posted,
almost verbatim:
string res = ;
for(i, rev v; args)
res ~= string.format(, f(args[%d]).val());
I'm building a nix environment for dmd, and am having problems
buiding dmd from source on it.
I'm following the instructions on the wiki:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_DMD
The first thing I've run into seems that the X64 instructions are
out of date? it says to do make -f posix.mak MODEL=64,
On Sunday, July 07, 2013 12:25:50 monarch_dodra wrote:
I'm building a nix environment for dmd, and am having problems
buiding dmd from source on it.
I'm following the instructions on the wiki:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_DMD
The first thing I've run into seems that the X64 instructions
Hello!
I try to create a RDM socket, but all my attempts fails by
Unable to create socket: Socket type not supported error.
How can I create a RDM socket using std.socket module?
Thanks.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/de/precise/libcurl-dev
Should do it, on Ubuntu/Debian you always need the -dev or -devel
packages if you want to link against something or use the header files
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 10:57:08 UTC, David wrote:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/de/precise/libcurl-dev
Should do it, on Ubuntu/Debian you always need the -dev or
-devel
packages if you want to link against something or use the
header files
Most awesome. Got it to work installing libcurl-dev.
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
