https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14617
--- Comment #5 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com ---
Andrei, that's exactly what I did.
I just realized, I messed up and left that initializer in the types.d file,
when I tried doing it in the pthread.d file.
Fixing that, it does work.
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 02:43:47 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
I'm a fan of lisp(Clojure being my favorite. Too bad it takes
about a century just to load the runtime...), and yet I find it
quite ironic that Paul Graham claims lisp to be the most
powerful language right after claiming that
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 11:07:19 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 02:43:47 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
I'm a fan of lisp(Clojure being my favorite. Too bad it takes
about a century just to load the runtime...), and yet I find
it quite ironic that Paul Graham claims lisp to be
On Saturday, 23 May 2015 at 04:40:28 UTC, tcak wrote:
[snip]
Yup, you need to use == to match the exact type.
Btw, you can use enum templates from std.traits, to accomplish
the same with less code:
public void setMarker(M)( size_t markerIndex, M markerValue )
if(isScalarType!M)
{
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 09:43:38 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 07:21:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Rust's syntax dooms it to the same niche as Haskell.
They'd have been better off to go with XML. I think the
developers got comfortable with the syntax as they went along,
and they
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 14:46:52 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
[snip]
Correction: not exactly the same, because isScalar also allows
wchar, dchar and const and immutable versions of those 'scalar'
types.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14617
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 07:21:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Rust's syntax dooms it to the same niche as Haskell.
They'd have been better off to go with XML. I think the
developers got comfortable with the syntax as they went along,
and they have no idea just how ugly it is.
Would be interesting to get some opinions on this.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1282
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 14:15:55 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
This IS ironic, because Paul Graham claims lisp to be the most
powerful, but if he have ever encounter a more powerful
language he couldn't accept it is more powerful than lisp due
to the very same Blub Paradox he describes himself.
I'm a bit confused by the documentation of the ctfe limitations
wrt static arrays due to these seemingly conflicting statements,
and the examples didn't seem to clear anything up. I was
wondering if anyone has examples of clever things that might be
done with static arrays and pointers using
Hello everyone!
I want to know whether there are any plans for the inclusion of
such a module in Phobos?
Documentation:
http://denis-sh.bitbucket.org/unstandard/unstd.multidimarray.html
Source:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 17:35:39 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
I'm a bit confused by the documentation of the ctfe limitations
wrt static arrays due to these seemingly conflicting
statements, and the examples didn't seem to clear anything up.
I was wondering if anyone has examples of clever
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 16:51:44 UTC, CodeSun wrote:
Hello guys,
Today, I found a weird problem when I was learning to enable
SO_KEEPALIVE for a specific socket. I use setsockopt to enable
keepalive firstly, and then use getsockopt to show if it is
enabled correctly.
My code snippet is
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 18:40:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 17:22:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 11:59:00 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 09:43:38 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 07:21:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Rust's
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8914
John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On 5/24/15 1:20 AM, weaselcat wrote:
IMO I think the worst thing C++ has done is blatantly ignore features
that have been 'killer' in D(see: the reaction to the static_if proposal)
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4461.html -- Andrei
code
import core.stdc.stdio;
static int[] _array = [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ];
int[] array() @property { printf(array()\n); return _array; }
int start() @property { printf(start()\n); return 0; }
int end() @property { printf(end()\n); return 1; }
void main()
{
array[start..end] = 666;
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 14:13:26 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Would be interesting to get some opinions on this.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1282
Looks like a good step in the right direction.
Some questions about:
This provides a strong incentive to no longer use
On Saturday, 23 May 2015 at 05:17:13 UTC, Danni Coy wrote:
Got very close to a year or so ago. Probably something I would
be much
more capable of doing now. The only downside is that I enjoy
doing
asset creation more.
That's perfect, actually. Shoot me an email, we can all assemble
a D team
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 18:14:19 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Static array has a special meaning. It does not mean static
variable with an array type. Static arrays are those of the
form Type[size]. That is, the size is known statically.
PS: You may also see the term fixed-size array which means
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 15:40:21 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 14:15:55 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
This IS ironic, because Paul Graham claims lisp to be the most
powerful, but if he have ever encounter a more powerful
language he couldn't accept it is more powerful than
Hello guys,
Today, I found a weird problem when I was learning to enable
SO_KEEPALIVE for a specific socket. I use setsockopt to enable
keepalive firstly, and then use getsockopt to show if it is
enabled correctly.
My code snippet is listed below:
Dlang version:
import
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14571
--- Comment #20 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/ae31c78687ca24c692e84cc97d5b5f1e975be84b
fix Issue 14571 -
Another good attempt to simplify operations with multidimensional
arrays and matrices:
https://github.com/k3kaimu/carbon/blob/master/source/carbon/linear.d
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14571
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://dconf.org/2015/talks/wakeling.html
Joseph has graciously agreed to fill in for Don who is unable to attend. We'll
miss Don, but are looking forward to hearing Joseph!
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 15:53:24 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
But according to the Blub Paradox, your(Or mine. Or Paul
Graham's) opinion on whether or not a stronger language than
Lisp has appeared can not be trusted!
Based on an article Graham about Blub Paradox, I can conclude
that Blub Paradox
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 17:22:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 11:59:00 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 09:43:38 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 07:21:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Rust's syntax dooms it to the same niche as Haskell.
They'd have
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 11:59:00 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 09:43:38 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 07:21:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Rust's syntax dooms it to the same niche as Haskell.
They'd have been better off to go with XML. I think the
developers
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 19:30:54 UTC, kinke wrote:
code
import core.stdc.stdio;
static int[] _array = [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ];
int[] array() @property { printf(array()\n); return _array; }
int start() @property { printf(start()\n); return 0; }
int end() @property { printf(end()\n); return 1;
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 19:48:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The original code is clearly wrong. And forcing the order of
evaluation so that it's one way or the other just changes under
which cases you end up with bugs. Mutating in an expression
while using it multiple times in that
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 20:53:03 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 18:14:19 UTC, anonymous wrote:
[...]
1) static int[5] x; -- x is a static variable with a static
array type
2) static int[] x; -- static variable, dynamic array
3) int[5] x; -- non-static variable, static
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 16:51:44 UTC, CodeSun wrote:
Hello guys,
Today, I found a weird problem when I was learning to enable
SO_KEEPALIVE for a specific socket. I use setsockopt to enable
keepalive firstly, and then use getsockopt to show if it is
enabled correctly.
My code snippet is
On 24 May 2015 23:30, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 21:18:54 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
The gcc backend obviously supports ordered operations, because some
operations are ordered today.
Iain has talked in the past about how
On 5/24/15 1:29 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
BTW, the documentation contradicts itself on evaluation order:
http://dlang.org/expression.html
This comes up once in a while. We should stick with left to right
through and through. It's a simple matter of getting somebody on the
compiler team to find
On 05/25/2015 12:15 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/24/15 1:29 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
BTW, the documentation contradicts itself on evaluation order:
http://dlang.org/expression.html
This comes up once in a while. We should stick with left to right
through and through. It's a simple matter
On 05/25/2015 01:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think LTR is the most sensible in all cases. -- Andrei
It is also what Java and C# do.
Self-criticism is necessary for improvement.
Yes, and what matters is after the storm has passed what you have
done with that energy. People with high standards and no
immediate ability to change things often complain a lot ;) To
this newcomer, at least, the progress is impressive.
On 05/24/2015 10:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 20:30:00 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/24/2015 09:48 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 19:30:54 UTC, kinke wrote:
code
import core.stdc.stdio;
static int[] _array = [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ];
int[] array()
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 21:13:02 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 21:11:34 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 16:51:44 UTC, CodeSun wrote:
Hello guys,
Today, I found a weird problem when I was learning to enable
SO_KEEPALIVE for a specific socket. I use
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 20:36:47 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Weaselcat:
FWIW I'm not picking on Rust, I used it for a rather long
time(while in beta, obviously) before I switched to D full
time for my academic work and I don't regret my decision. I
thought Rust would get more improvements
On 25 May 2015 00:20, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 5/24/15 1:29 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
BTW, the documentation contradicts itself on evaluation order:
http://dlang.org/expression.html
This comes up once in a while. We should stick with left to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14619
Jonathan M Davis issues.dl...@jmdavisprog.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On 05/25/2015 12:36 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
This comes up once in a while. We should stick with left to right
through and through. It's a simple matter of getting somebody on the
compiler team to find the time for it. -- Andrei
I find it is not as clear cut as that. In
I've read through these now, which I missed the first time around, so
sorry for making you guys repeat yourselves ;)
Runtime issue on Mac OS X
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.runtime/1214
ideas for runtime loading of shared libraries.
On 05/24/2015 09:48 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 19:30:54 UTC, kinke wrote:
code
import core.stdc.stdio;
static int[] _array = [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ];
int[] array() @property { printf(array()\n); return _array; }
int start() @property { printf(start()\n); return 0; }
int
A first draft of the interfaces is available here:
https://github.com/McSherry/phobos/blob/std.archive/std/archive/interfaces.d
Please feel free to tear to pieces, make suggestions, etc.
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 23:32:52 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
...
Small correction for clarity:
void main()
{
Derived d = new Derived();
d.x = 13;
d.y = 15;
// 1) writeln(callMethod!(Derived, Derived.toString)(d)); -
Should print 15
// 2) writeln(callBaseMethod!(Derived,
I am writing a daemon that parses an ini file and goes about its
business. In C++ I create a thread that does an inotify on the
ini file and when it changes, it locks the associative array that
contains the parsed ini file, reparses it and then does an unlock
and goes back to waiting for the
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 20:30:00 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/24/2015 09:48 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 19:30:54 UTC, kinke wrote:
code
import core.stdc.stdio;
static int[] _array = [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ];
int[] array() @property { printf(array()\n); return _array;
}
Weaselcat:
FWIW I'm not picking on Rust, I used it for a rather long
time(while in beta, obviously) before I switched to D full time
for my academic work and I don't regret my decision. I thought
Rust would get more improvements than it did. I feel like they
made so many poor decisions as
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 18:14:19 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Static array has a special meaning. It does not mean static
variable with an array type. Static arrays are those of the
form Type[size]. That is, the size is known statically.
Examples:
1) static int[5] x; -- x is a static variable
On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:40:04 -0400, bitwise bitwise@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
So at this point, it seems like these two fixes work as expected, but
now, I'm having some new and very strange problems.
I have a simple shared library and program I've been using to test this:
[main.d]
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 20:36:47 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Without wishing to dwell on the negatives of alternatives,
might I ask what made you decide to settle on D? Do you have
collaborators who write code and, if so, how did the
discussions with them go about this? For your use case,
On 05/24/2015 11:26 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 21:18:54 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
The gcc backend obviously supports ordered operations, because some
operations are ordered today.
Iain has talked in the past about how they're forced to work around the
backend to force
Robbin wrote in message news:yykhtfrfflbxdkuka...@forum.dlang.org...
Hi Robbin,
Problem 1 is defining the thread variable as a member of my ini class.
Since I have to use the auto t = thread(parser), I can't figure out what
type to make t in the class. auto is no good without a rhs to give
import std.stdio, std.conv, std.traits;
class Base
{
int x;
override string toString() const
{
return x.to!string;
}
}
class Derived : Base
{
int y;
override string toString() const
{
return y.to!string;
}
}
void callMethod(T, alias Method)(const
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 17:46:40 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
Another good attempt to simplify operations with
multidimensional arrays and matrices:
https://github.com/k3kaimu/carbon/blob/master/source/carbon/linear.d
You might take a look at Vlad Levenfeld's work too, although I
think he
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 21:11:34 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 16:51:44 UTC, CodeSun wrote:
Hello guys,
Today, I found a weird problem when I was learning to enable
SO_KEEPALIVE for a specific socket. I use setsockopt to enable
keepalive firstly, and then use getsockopt
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 21:18:54 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
The gcc backend obviously supports ordered operations, because
some operations are ordered today.
Iain has talked in the past about how they're forced to work
around the backend to force the order of operations for those
cases, and
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14619
Issue ID: 14619
Summary: foreach implicitly slices ranges
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 20:45:56 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
You might take a look at Vlad Levenfeld's work too, although I
think he would say that it is still at an early stage (if I
understand correctly - looks very interesting to me, although I
have not yet properly had time to explore it
On 5/24/15 3:36 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 25 May 2015 00:20, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com mailto:digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 5/24/15 1:29 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
BTW, the documentation contradicts itself on evaluation order:
On 24 May 2015 23:45, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 20:36:47 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Weaselcat:
FWIW I'm not picking on Rust, I used it for a rather long time(while in
beta, obviously) before I switched to D full time for my
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7454
Maurice van der Pot griffo...@kfk4ever.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bounty
---
I suspect many of us have DConf on the mind and aren't quite as
active on the forums, my impression was this was a pretty quiet
week and none of the merged PRs jumped out at me either.
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/may-24.html
I still have to do a dconf talk outline myself! Hopefully I'll
On Monday, May 25, 2015 03:42:22 tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 03:35:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, May 25, 2015 03:19:29 tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
Is there any syntax for something like that:
class Resource(T) if( is(T:
On Monday, May 25, 2015 03:19:29 tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Is there any syntax for something like that:
class Resource(T) if( is(T: FileResource) ){
}
I tried it as above, but it is not accepted. Maybe I am following
a wrong syntax.
I tried
class Resource(T: FileResource){
}
On 25/05/2015 9:32 a.m., Liam McSherry wrote:
A first draft of the interfaces is available here:
https://github.com/McSherry/phobos/blob/std.archive/std/archive/interfaces.d
Please feel free to tear to pieces, make suggestions, etc.
I'm impressed an interface has been started!
Anyway, take
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 03:35:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, May 25, 2015 03:19:29 tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
Is there any syntax for something like that:
class Resource(T) if( is(T: FileResource) ){
}
I tried it as above, but it is not accepted. Maybe I am
following
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14617
--- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com ---
Yep, still fails in the autotester. What do we want to do?
a) just fix pthread.d so PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER is proper, but
pthread_mutex_t.init is not
b) fix the Makefile so it
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 04:07:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, May 25, 2015 03:42:22 tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
Well, if I do not check the line number of error, this happens.
It was giving error on the line of creating a new instance.
Line 243: auto fileResourceList =
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 21:11:34 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 16:51:44 UTC, CodeSun wrote:
Hello guys,
Today, I found a weird problem when I was learning to enable
SO_KEEPALIVE for a specific socket. I use setsockopt to enable
keepalive firstly, and then use getsockopt
On 5/23/15 4:27 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Saturday, May 23, 2015 07:03:33 Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
int[] arr = [1, 2, 3];
auto r = iota(4, 10);
// ???
assert(equal(arr, iota(1, 10)));
Hopefully in one GC allocation (assuming we know the
On Sunday, May 24, 2015 22:13:25 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
On 5/23/15 4:27 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Saturday, May 23, 2015 07:03:33 Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
int[] arr = [1, 2, 3];
auto r = iota(4, 10);
//
Is there any syntax for something like that:
class Resource(T) if( is(T: FileResource) ){
}
I tried it as above, but it is not accepted. Maybe I am following
a wrong syntax.
I tried
class Resource(T: FileResource){
}
But it is not accepted as well.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14614
--- Comment #2 from Michael Hewitt mich...@hewitts.us ---
VS 2013 Community Edition is working fine for now. Thank you for the pointer.
--
On Saturday, 23 May 2015 at 14:20:40 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 16:00 +, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Friday, 22 May 2015 at 14:11:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
+1, finally, something other than the usual bickering on the
forum. ;-)
LOL. Don't worry.
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 07:21:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
It's a good sign that C++ has been copying D features recently,
it means they're feeling the heat.
I suspect that it's not so much that they're really feeling any
pressure from D so much as that when they see a cool feature that
they
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 08:05:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 07:21:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
It's a good sign that C++ has been copying D features
recently, it means they're feeling the heat.
I suspect that it's not so much that they're really feeling any
pressure
81 matches
Mail list logo
