On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 07:55:55 UTC, seen wrote:
I don't know why but when using a template union with a static
ubyte array i get bizarre results!
module main;
import std.stdio;
private union ByteConverter(T)
{
ubyte[T.sizeof] bytes;
T value;
}
ubyte[] toBytes(T)(T from)
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 07:51:31 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 21:23:11 UTC, Momo wrote:
Ah, actually it's more complicated, as it depends on inlining a
lot.
Yes. And real functions are more complex and inlining is no
reliable option.
Indeed, without -O and -inline I was
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 03:23:39 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/05/2015 3:57 a.m., Olivier Prince wrote:
I searched the forum to find if there is some support for new
Windows
development technologies and I didn't find anything related
(except some
rants about WinRT 3 years ago).
- Is
I don't know why but when using a template union with a static
ubyte array i get bizarre results!
module main;
import std.stdio;
private union ByteConverter(T)
{
ubyte[T.sizeof] bytes;
T value;
}
ubyte[] toBytes(T)(T from) if (!is(T == const))
{
ByteConverter!T
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 07:51:31 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
Above was on Core 2 Quad,
here's for Core i3:
4 ints 5 ints
-release
by ref: 67 by ref: 66
by copy: 44 by copy: 142
by move: 45 by move: 137
-release -O
by ref: 29 by ref: 29
by copy: 41 by copy: 141
by
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9279
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9279
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Static array return value |[REG2.055/2.063]
On 29/05/2015 7:03 p.m., Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 03:23:39 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/05/2015 3:57 a.m., Olivier Prince wrote:
I searched the forum to find if there is some support for new Windows
development technologies and I didn't find anything related (except
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 21:23:11 UTC, Momo wrote:
Ah, actually it's more complicated, as it depends on inlining a
lot.
Indeed, without -O and -inline I was able to get by_ref to be
slightly slower than by_copy for struct of 4 ints. But when
inlining turns on, the numbers change in
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 08:00:54 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 07:55:55 UTC, seen wrote:
I don't know why but when using a template union with a static
ubyte array i get bizarre results!
module main;
import std.stdio;
private union ByteConverter(T)
{
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 17:22:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/28/15 8:38 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
* Forceinline.
Thanks for initiating this! The lack of a means to force
inlining has been unpleasant at Facebook as well. It would be
great if we got this (and of course
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 21:23:11 UTC, Momo wrote:
I'm currently investigating the difference of speed between
references and copies. And it seems that copies got a immense
slowdown if they reach a size of = 20 bytes.
This is processor-specific, on different models of CPUs you might
get
On 05/29/2015 12:55 AM, seen wrote:
I don't know why but when using a template union with a static ubyte
array i get bizarre results!
module main;
import std.stdio;
private union ByteConverter(T)
{
ubyte[T.sizeof] bytes;
That's a fixed-length array (aka static array), which has value
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 07:55:55 UTC, seen wrote:
ubyte[] toBytes(T)(T from) if (!is(T == const))
{
ByteConverter!T converter;
converter.value = from;
return converter.bytes;
}
This function is incorrect: it is returning a slice (dynamic
array) of a static array,
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 21:23:59 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/79cc8bf0766282368f05314d00566e7d234988bd/bylinefast.d#L207
which is currently deactivated.
It has worked flawlessly in my applications, so none AFAIK.
Could this replace the stuck
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14628
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 04:00:22 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
At the very least, I will need to use my laptop for my own
talk. I would also really like to be able to use it during the
day beforehand.
Or you could borrow another laptop for the presentation/slides
and let your own for the live
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 21:27:06 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Speed-up varies between 2.0 and 2.7 according to recent
experiments done using new unittest at
The test file
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.9/en/instance_types_en.nt.bz2
contains 15.9 Mlines :)
/Per
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14630
Issue ID: 14630
Summary: Std.algorithm splitter segfault on large file with
mmfile, seems GC related.
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7753
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
--- Comment #6 from
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 11:17:00 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 17:16:53 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
Foo f;
f[5][3] = Foo(42); translates to
f.opIndex!(true)(5).opIndex!(true)(3) = Foo(42);
auto x = f[5][4]; translates to
auto x =
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 11:16:27 UTC, Mike wrote:
But, if you'll forgive my ignorance, what is the primary
motivation for migrating to a library AA?
- The current implementation uses runtime type information
(TypeInfo) to compute hashes and compare keys. That's at least 2
virtual
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 10:01:53 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/05/2015 9:55 p.m., Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 07:41:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/05/2015 7:03 p.m., Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 03:23:39 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On
I need mutable storage for immutable associative array. Just
create new immutable AA and store it for future passing it
between threads/fibers.
First attempt: just immutable AA
immutable aa = [1:1, 2:1];
aa = [1:1, 2:1]; // fail, can't assign a new AA
Second attempt: mutable AA with immutable
I made trivial pull request -
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3341
RebindableAA!(immutable int[string]) aa = [a: 1, b: 2]; //
works
assert(aa[a] == 1); // cool
aa = [a: 3, b: 4]; // nice
auto bb = aa; // yes
bb = [a: 4, b: 5]; // super
aa[a] = 2; //
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 10:40:22 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 14:38:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
The trick is getting something (anything) to shift to D in the
office,
giving other programmers some exposure, and give us a context
to
experiment with D in application to
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 09:22:56 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 20:22:44 UTC, rumbu wrote:
- lack of a decimal data type - you cannot perform monetary
calculation using floating point.
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_bigint.html?
No. There is no scale in BigInt. 1 / 2
On 29/05/2015 9:55 p.m., Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 07:41:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/05/2015 7:03 p.m., Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 03:23:39 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/05/2015 3:57 a.m., Olivier Prince wrote:
I searched the forum to find
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 09:33:25 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 14:38:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
I expect I'm not alone. Please share the absolute blockers
preventing
you from adopting D in your offices. I wonder if there will be
common
themes emerge?
If you're interested in
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 10:05:08 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 09:33:25 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 14:38:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
I expect I'm not alone. Please share the absolute blockers
preventing
you from adopting D in your offices. I wonder if there
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 14:13:26 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Would be interesting to get some opinions on this.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1282
For my own reasons, a library AA is most welcome:
* separating library features from language features
* making features
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 17:16:53 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
Foo f;
f[5][3] = Foo(42); translates to
f.opIndex!(true)(5).opIndex!(true)(3) = Foo(42);
auto x = f[5][4]; translates to
auto x = f.opIndex!(false)(5).opIndex!(false)(3);
We shouldn't replace opIndexAssign though, b/c
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 08:48:59 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2794?
That's a massive discussion. Is it possible to describe in
shorter terms what the problem is and how it relates to byLine?
Please.
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 14:38:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
I expect I'm not alone. Please share the absolute blockers
preventing
you from adopting D in your offices. I wonder if there will be
common
themes emerge?
- Quality of ecosystem. It's relatively simple to run into an
issue, that requires
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 09:17:17 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
That's a massive discussion. Is it possible to describe in
shorter terms what the problem is and how it relates to byLine?
Would the problem be solved if `byLine` was changed to not use
`readln()`?
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 03:09:07 UTC, ketmar wrote:
i think
that there is some sense in trading some speed for better
distribution.
what do you think?
We discussed most part of this already.
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mff4id$hj8$1...@digitalmars.com
And we're already using MurmurHash3
We use D in our work a little. And we dont using it more because we do not need
to ;).
We have a quite big php codebase and bacause od facebook(hhvm) our code is fast
enought.
- Původní zpráva -
Od:Manu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
Odesláno:28. 5. 2015 16:40
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 08:57:46 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 17:22:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/28/15 8:38 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
* Forceinline.
Thanks for initiating this! The lack of a means to force
inlining has been unpleasant at Facebook
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9279
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #7)
I'm not sure it should be called regression. Yes, the two enhancement PRs
appended the cases of original wrong-code bug, caused by the
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 03:23:39 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/05/2015 3:57 a.m., Olivier Prince wrote:
I searched the forum to find if there is some support for new
Windows
development technologies and I didn't find anything related
(except some
rants about WinRT 3 years ago).
- Is
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 14:38:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
The trick is getting something (anything) to shift to D in the
office,
giving other programmers some exposure, and give us a context to
experiment with D in application to our particular workload;
that is,
realtime processing and rendering
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 21:24:25 UTC, bitwise wrote:
Basically, I've gone back to the idea of using the dylib
ctor/dtors. I don't think we really even need the image-added
callback, at least not for dylibs.
Looks good. The compiler could add a simple ctor/dtor to any D
object.
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 20:22:44 UTC, rumbu wrote:
- lack of a decimal data type - you cannot perform monetary
calculation using floating point.
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_bigint.html?
- lack of a chinese or japanese calendar in the std.datetime
module;
- missing of overflow checks for
A little bit faster than murnurhash3 in my scenerio. But I prefer farmhash.
http://code.google.com/p/farmhash/
- Původní zpráva -
Od:Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
Odesláno:29. 5. 2015 11:41
Komu:digitalmars-d@puremagic.com digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 07:41:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/05/2015 7:03 p.m., Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 03:23:39 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/05/2015 3:57 a.m., Olivier Prince wrote:
I searched the forum to find if there is some support for
new Windows
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9279
--- Comment #9 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #8)
You can call it whatever you like, but ultimately the effect is that
something works as expected in version N and then doesn't in version N+1.
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 17:22:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/28/15 8:38 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
* Forceinline.
Thanks for initiating this! The lack of a means to force
inlining has been unpleasant at Facebook as well. It would be
great if we got this (and of course
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14614
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 14:38:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
I expect I'm not alone. Please share the absolute blockers
preventing
you from adopting D in your offices. I wonder if there will be
common
themes emerge?
If you're interested in enterprise point of view, our ecosystem
is build around
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9279
--- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #6)
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #2)
I guess that makes it a regression.
I'm not sure it should be called regression. Yes, the two
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 09:50:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Walter said likely/unlikely won't be implemented as the
compiler already assumes the first condition is the more likely
one the last time this was brought up.
That is not what he said
On 2015-05-29 11:48, Daniel Kozák via Digitalmars-d wrote:
We use D in our work a little. And we dont using it more because we do
not need to ;).
We have a quite big php codebase and bacause od facebook(hhvm) our code
is fast enought.
You're using PHP? Then that's reason enough to switch :)
On 2015-05-28 11:10 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 00:08:10 UTC, Andre Kostur wrote:
I'm looking for one of two things:
1) If I have a sockaddr_in, how do I get it into an InternetAddress?
First of all, you may not actually need an InternetAddress. Modern code
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 12:52:29 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 11:22:53 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
Sorry, I meant
f.opIndex!(true)(5).opIndexAssign(Foo(42), 3);
Added to the ER.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7753#c6
Thanks, but unfortunately, writing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9279
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #10 from
On 2015-05-27 23:24, bitwise wrote:
Good point.
I've come up another solution and posted it here:
http://dpaste.com/0DXBSNQ
Will dladdr return different values (mach_header) for different
dynamic libraries? Won't there only be one init function, as you said
earlier. Or does it work somehow
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 12:23:14 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 09:22:56 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 20:22:44 UTC, rumbu wrote:
- lack of a decimal data type - you cannot perform monetary
calculation using floating point.
I know some people don't like abusing opDollar, but here's my
implementation:
import std.traits, std.algorithm, std.conv;
private struct Named(string n, T) {
enum name = n;
T value;
}
private auto makeNameIndex(NamedList...)(string[] names) {
auto indices = new
On 2015-05-29 00:35, Atila Neves wrote:
I might do a blog post on this, but here's some POC code:
import std.stdio;
import std.range;
import std.typetuple;
import std.traits;
import std.conv;
struct Foo { int i; }
struct Bar { int i; }
struct Baz { int i; }
void func(Foo foo, Bar bar, Baz
On 2015-05-28 22:22, rumbu wrote:
- lack of a chinese or japanese calendar in the std.datetime module;
What about Tango [1]?
[1]
http://dsource.org/projects/tango/docs/current/tango.time.chrono.Japanese.html
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 11:22:53 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
Sorry, I meant
f.opIndex!(true)(5).opIndexAssign(Foo(42), 3);
Added to the ER.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7753#c6
Perhaps you can give me another detailed answer.
I get a slowdown for all parts (ref, copy and move) if I use
uninitialized floats. I got these results from the following code:
by ref: 2369
by copy: 2335
by move: 2341
Code:
struct vec2f {
float x;
float y;
}
But if I assign 0 to
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 12:52:12 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-05-28 22:22, rumbu wrote:
- lack of a chinese or japanese calendar in the std.datetime
module;
What about Tango [1]?
[1]
http://dsource.org/projects/tango/docs/current/tango.time.chrono.Japanese.html
The Japanese
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 11:29:13 UTC, Chris wrote:
This is very interesting. It kinda defeats the D is too
complicated argument I often hear.
I don't know what is typical, but I am dealing with Python,
Javascript, Dart, C++ and Objective-C for commercial use, and
plan on adding Swift.
On 05/29/2015 06:43 PM, tcak wrote:
I have define an immutable string array:
[code]
immutable string[] placeHolderDefinitionList = [
!-- fullname --,
!-- list item --
];
[/code]
I need to get index of a string at compile time. So I have written a
function as below:
[code]
public
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 12:46:43 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-05-27 23:24, bitwise wrote:
Good point.
I've come up another solution and posted it here:
http://dpaste.com/0DXBSNQ
Will dladdr return different values (mach_header) for
different dynamic libraries? Won't there only be
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 14:38:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
I expect I'm not alone. Please share the absolute blockers
preventing
you from adopting D in your offices. I wonder if there will be
common
themes emerge?
I do use it at work, but I also don't really have a collaborative
codebase. These
On 05/29/2015 08:04 AM, Dicebot wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA1exjdEIWw
Yay! :D
Ali
I have define an immutable string array:
[code]
immutable string[] placeHolderDefinitionList = [
!-- fullname --,
!-- list item --
];
[/code]
I need to get index of a string at compile time. So I have
written a function as below:
[code]
public size_t
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 14:22:58 UTC, Chris wrote:
However, for a constantly growing long-term code base, D is my
language of choice. It's clean (i.e. maintainable), flexible
(many ways to tackle new problems), easily unit-testable and,
of course, compiles to native machine code. It also
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA1exjdEIWw
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 15:02:45 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH35IxWkx8M
:-)
day 3 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA1exjdEIWw
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 13:34:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Quote from dconf WA ask me anything:
Q: Will we get a macro system
Both Walter and Andrei: no
It's safe to close the corresponding DIPs?
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 22:35:14 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I might do a blog post on this, but here's some POC code:
Now with default values!
import std.stdio;
import std.range;
import std.typetuple;
import std.traits;
import std.conv;
struct Foo { int i; }
struct Bar { int i; }
struct
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 14:38:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
I expect I'm not alone. Please share the absolute blockers
preventing you from adopting D in your offices.
If awareness of its existence weren't a problem, it wouldn't be a
long list. Mostly SPARC/Solaris and Politics (including inertia
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 13:45:56 UTC, rumbu wrote:
Tahngo was nice but not supported anymore
Two months ago it had an update that bumped tested version to
2.067.
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 14:46:06 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 14:22:58 UTC, Chris wrote:
However, for a constantly growing long-term code base, D is my
language of choice. It's clean (i.e. maintainable), flexible
(many ways to tackle new problems), easily
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 12:39:20 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-05-29 11:48, Daniel Kozák via Digitalmars-d wrote:
We use D in our work a little. And we dont using it more
because we do
not need to ;).
We have a quite big php codebase and bacause od facebook(hhvm)
our code
is fast
Two other ways to implement the concept. The first works with optional
arguments and the other requires all arguments.
/**
* Optional arguments and no default values; might not compile if all args
* not passed.
*/
---
/**
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 15:16:56 UTC, Jonathan Crapuchettes
wrote:
Two other ways to implement the concept. The first works with
optional
arguments and the other requires all arguments.
unittest
{
alias arg1 = namedArguments!(arg1, string);
alias arg2 = namedArguments!(arg2, int);
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 13:12:58 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
Thanks, but unfortunately, writing enhacement request to
bugzilla is equals to writing to /dev/null :)
No it's not, it keeps us from rediscussing the same stuff over
and over.
I'll create a DIP about this, when I'll have a free
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 10:32:50 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 09:50:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Walter said likely/unlikely won't be implemented as the
compiler already assumes the first condition is the more
likely one the last time this was brought up.
That is not what
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 13:12:58 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
What do you want about this syntax? Maybe you may suggest a
better solution?
The discussion drifts a little OT, if we have opIndexCreate, then
the library AA can be more compatible, but it still won't be a
drop-in replacement.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7753
--- Comment #7 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #6)
Igor Stepanov suggested [¹] an opIndex extension.
ref Foo opIndex(bool lvalue)(size_t idx)
A separate opIndexCreate might be better, b/c it allows you to
In nearly every benchmark I see D in, the default compiler used
is dmd which runs computationally intense tasks 4-5x+ slower than
GDC/LDC
example of a random blog post I found:
http://vaskir.blogspot.com/2015/04/computing-cryptography-hashes-rust-vs-f.html
D is up to 10x(!) slower than Rust.
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 15:57:42 UTC, Olivier Prince wrote:
I searched the forum to find if there is some support for new
Windows development technologies and I didn't find anything
related (except some rants about WinRT 3 years ago).
- Is there any support in D or phobos for developping
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 18:38:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This will probably offend some people, but I think LDC/GDC
should be the
default download on dlang.org, and dmd should be provided as an
alternative for those who want the latest language version and
don't
mind the speed compromise.
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 21:58:16 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
I suggest you to answer to the following two question:
1. What way to transit to the new AA would be acceptable?
One that doesn't break any code, carefully deprecates necessary
semantic changes, and provides an improved
On Fri, 29 May 2015 11:58:09 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:50:02PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 18:38:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This will probably offend some people, but I think LDC/GDC should be
the default
On Fri, 29 May 2015 23:29:39 +, weaselcat wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 23:19:36 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2015 20:02:47 +, Martin Krejcirik wrote:
dmd
- reference compiler, Digital Mars backend - best for
latest dlang
features, fast compile times
gdc
- GNU
On 5/29/15 3:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos
documentation build for dlang.org. Could someone look into this pronto?
-- Andrei
I'm working on the UnixAddress issues, will have a PR after I verify it
passes the normal tests.
On 5/29/15 3:47 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 5/29/15 3:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos
documentation build for dlang.org. Could someone look into this pronto?
-- Andrei
I'm working on the UnixAddress issues, will have a PR
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:56:43PM -0600, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5/29/15 3:47 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 5/29/15 3:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos
documentation build for dlang.org. Could someone
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 23:42:00 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
DConf 2015 has been awesome, I'm taking a minute to post this
that's been announced a short while ago.
We're pleased to announce that DConf 2016 will take place in
Berlin, sponsored by Sociomantic.
We'll be back with
On 2015-05-29 5:42 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
DConf 2015 has been awesome, I'm taking a minute to post this that's
been announced a short while ago.
We're pleased to announce that DConf 2016 will take place in Berlin,
sponsored by Sociomantic.
We'll be back with details. See you there!
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14631
Issue ID: 14631
Summary: Hide deprecated modules
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 17:52:58 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 13:12:58 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
What do you want about this syntax? Maybe you may suggest a
better solution?
The discussion drifts a little OT, if we have opIndexCreate,
then the library AA can be more
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13015
Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 5/29/15 4:02 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5/29/15 3:56 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3344
And BTW, how can we get the ddoc build to be part of the auto tester?
It's kind of important. Luckily, it's only
On Fri, 29 May 2015 09:36:22 +, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 03:09:07 UTC, ketmar wrote:
i think that there is some sense in trading some speed for better
distribution.
what do you think?
We discussed most part of this already.
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
