Fixing implicit copies of InputRanges [was: Re: Mir Random [WIP]]

On Saturday, 26 November 2016 at 06:46:19 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Maybe non-copyability needs to become a requirement for InputRanges. Could have an optional .clone if copying is supported. What would be an InputRange where copying is correct? We already have refRange for that, no? Also

Re: Mir Random [WIP]

On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 01:34:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/22/16 7:30 PM, John Colvin wrote: On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 23:55:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: The proposed design has disabled copy ctor and uses opCall() for a new element. That seems to be a

Re: ESA's Schiaparelli Mars probe crashed because of integer overflow

On 11/25/2016 4:22 AM, Claude wrote: So, I like too to think it's just due to an integer overflow. But not from a software engineer perspective, but more from a Marxist approach. One misses a simple test over an integer, and you make a rocket-ship worth billions of good money (that could be used

Re: Mir Random announce - Professional RNGs

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > https://github.com/libmir/mir-random > http://docs.random.dlang.io/latest/index.html Like the betterC use case. Nice API. first example from the docs: import

Re: Reading image files

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 20:10:56 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote: glitchy image after rendering the result) and I have no idea how DerelictFI works at all, DerelictFI is just a binding to FreeImage, so the more relevant point to consider is how FreeImage works :-) Everything you need to

Re: Transitioning std lib modules/packages

On 26/11/2016 6:16 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: 2. Make the new json be something like std.data.json. We'd already talked about doing that before. Then the new xml stuff could go in std.data.xml. It avoids the whole v2 thing by further reorganizing Phobos in a hierarchical

Re: DConf 2017: Bigger, Badder, and Berliner! Call for Submissions now open

On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 20:54:27 UTC, Andy Smith wrote: On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 01:36:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/19/16 4:17 PM, Andy Smith wrote: Until branding for the 2017 conf is sorted out/agreed would it be a big deal to 'steal' the cool purple D rocket

[Issue 16795] New: Allow taking address of 'scope' variable in some cases

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16795 Issue ID: 16795 Summary: Allow taking address of 'scope' variable in some cases Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Re: What is going on with the ubuntu/debian debacle ?

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:59:26PM +, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 23:27:52 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: > > On Sunday, 20 November 2016 at 03:28:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > > > On 11/19/2016 3:03 PM, deadalnix wrote: > > > > A lot of users are reporting

Re: DIP 1003: remove `body` as a keyword

Am 25.11.2016 um 23:28 schrieb Timon Gehr: On 25.11.2016 22:18, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Am 25.11.2016 um 12:39 schrieb Timon Gehr: On 24.11.2016 10:24, Kagamin wrote: I see no ambiguity even if parsing is not greedy. import std.stdio; pragma(mangle,"_D2tt4mainFZ3fooUZv") void foo()in{

Re: What is going on with the ubuntu/debian debacle ?

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 23:27:52 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Sunday, 20 November 2016 at 03:28:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 11/19/2016 3:03 PM, deadalnix wrote: A lot of users are reporting errors on debian and ubuntu. .o generated by dmd do not link and libphobos.a is unusable. This

[Issue 16771] Depreciation of implicit string concatenation in 2.072

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771 --- Comment #5 from anonymous4 --- (In reply to Joseph M Rice from comment #0) > In C/C++, Java, C# and > virtually every programming language based on the C syntax allows for > implicit string concatenation. No?

Re: the best language I have ever met(?)

On 11/25/16 18:33, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2016 18:20:11 Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-learn > wrote: >> On 11/25/16 17:30, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: >>> On Friday, November 25, 2016 17:03:32 Artur Skawina via enum

Re: What is going on with the ubuntu/debian debacle ?

On Sunday, 20 November 2016 at 03:28:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 11/19/2016 3:03 PM, deadalnix wrote: A lot of users are reporting errors on debian and ubuntu. .o generated by dmd do not link and libphobos.a is unusable. This is very bad and we should consider a hotfix. Is someone on it

[Issue 16794] Official .deb packages must compile libphobos2.a with -fPIC

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 --- Comment #1 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --- Alternatively, DMD needs to invoke gcc with -no-pie when linking D executables. However, I rather we don't go this route, because this would preclude ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization) on all

[Issue 16794] New: Official .deb packages must compile libphobos2.a with -fPIC

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 Issue ID: 16794 Summary: Official .deb packages must compile libphobos2.a with -fPIC Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW

Mir Random announce - Professional RNGs

https://github.com/libmir/mir-random http://docs.random.dlang.io/latest/index.html

Re: So these two compile and, in non-debug builds, run just fine

2016-11-25 16:30 GMT+01:00 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>: > > But I think Walter's scope changes (DIP 1001 I think?) will make it so the > compiler rejects this even in non-safe mode. > > -Steve > You are correct that DIP1000 will fix that. However it will

Re: @trusted AKA most useless statement ever

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 16:03:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Hmmm... ok, that would work by means of the convention "@safe + no implementation really means trusted". Not too convenient I'd say. @trusted means "@safe interface, @system implementation", so when you have only

Re: @trusted AKA most useless statement ever

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 10:14:46 UTC, Satoshi wrote: but writing 20 times something like: auto vi = (() @trusted => glXChooseXFBConfig(...))(); or: auto vi = () @trusted { return glXChooseXFBConfig(...); }(); Trusted blocks are used for safety inference in generic code, so that only

Re: Mir Random and Dlang Ranges [Example]

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 16:08:15 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 16:04:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I'd say we can bury the hatchet and move on with Ilya's API. -- Andrei Yes, this was clear. There are also others who may disagree. This is the reason

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On 25.11.2016 17:38, Kagamin wrote: On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 11:10:44 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: You can just as easily edit the while condition. I use it because "unconditional loop" is less silly than "loop until true is false". Unconditional loop can be implemented in 3 possible ways :)

Re: Mir Random and Dlang Ranges [Example]

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 15:56:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: What kind of state should not be copied by value? I thought it is only an Engine. Unfortunately that's not true. The sampling algorithm pulls some tricks to try to reduce the number of calls to the random number generator

Re: What is going on with the ubuntu/debian debacle ?

On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 14:00:15 UTC, ZombineDev wrote: On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 21:19:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:03:05PM +, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote: A lot of users are reporting errors on debian and ubuntu. .o generated by dmd do not

Re: So these two compile and, in non-debug builds, run just fine

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 15:30:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: But I think Walter's scope changes (DIP 1001 I think?) will make it so the compiler rejects this even in non-safe mode. -Steve I really hope this is the case. Because, it needs to be said. If a modern language fails

Re: Mir Random [WIP]

On Thursday, 24 November 2016 at 14:22:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: Then call popFront or drop before passing it along if you're paranoid about it. There's little need for it, as it was pointed out earlier that the generate algorithm does the right thing and needs only opCall, also a nice

Re: DIP 1003: remove `body` as a keyword

On 25.11.2016 22:18, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Am 25.11.2016 um 12:39 schrieb Timon Gehr: On 24.11.2016 10:24, Kagamin wrote: I see no ambiguity even if parsing is not greedy. import std.stdio; pragma(mangle,"_D2tt4mainFZ3fooUZv") void foo()in{ assert(true); }{ writeln("Hello World!"); } void

Re: Reading image files

On 11/25/2016 12:10 PM, solidstate1991 wrote: After I couldn't figure out how to convert Imageformats' own format to my own (consequential read from IFImage resulted in a glitchy image after rendering the result) and I have no idea how DerelictFI works at all, I'm currently out of options. At

[Issue 16743] Intrinsic recognition sometimes fails if a software implementation is available

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16743 --- Comment #4 from thomas.bock...@gmail.com --- I have tested and can confirm that this is fixed in master. Thanks. --

Re: DIP 1003: remove `body` as a keyword

Am 25.11.2016 um 12:39 schrieb Timon Gehr: On 24.11.2016 10:24, Kagamin wrote: I see no ambiguity even if parsing is not greedy. import std.stdio; pragma(mangle,"_D2tt4mainFZ3fooUZv") void foo()in{ assert(true); }{ writeln("Hello World!"); } void main(){ static extern(C) void foo()in{

Reading image files

After I couldn't figure out how to convert Imageformats' own format to my own (consequential read from IFImage resulted in a glitchy image after rendering the result) and I have no idea how DerelictFI works at all, I'm currently out of options. At least I need PNG and TGA (the latter is

[Issue 16771] Depreciation of implicit string concatenation in 2.072

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org

Re: Bot creating issues

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 07:17:20PM +, WM.H via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 17:37:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:34:53PM +, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via > > Digitalmars-d wrote: > > > On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 17:27:07 UTC, Dominikus

[Issue 16788] New: Tera Naam -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16788 Issue ID: 16788 Summary: Tera Naam -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbook s Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows

[Issue 16739] switch ignores case

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16739 --- Comment #3 from Ketmar Dark --- as i am incompatible with github ;-), anybody is, of course, free to take my hackfix and turn it into real fix (mostly by adding unittests, i guess). no credits required. --

[Issue 16739] switch ignores case

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16739 Ketmar Dark changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: Bot creating issues

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 17:37:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:34:53PM +, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 17:27:07 UTC, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote: > Hm. > > There seem to be some bot generating a lot of new

Re: the best language I have ever met(?)

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 14:27:39 UTC, Igor Shirkalin wrote: On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 18:58:55 UTC, ketmar wrote: We can define static array without counting the elements as following: enum array_ = [1u,2,3,4]; uint[array_.length] static_array = array_; there are

[Issue 16787] PhirSe Wahi -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16787 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16786] Tere Mere -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16786 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16785] Main Hoon -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16785 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16784] Jabse Tere -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16784 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

I don't mean an infinite loop for (;;), and violation of the concepts of structured programming, which put forward Dijkstra. for (;;) { ... if (condition) { break; } ... } outer: for (;;) { ... if (condition) { goto outer; } ... } I.e. in system

[Issue 16787] New: PhirSe Wahi -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16787 Issue ID: 16787 Summary: PhirSe Wahi -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbook s Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS:

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On Friday, November 25, 2016 11:51:24 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Jonathan, could you please make a PR to remove the parens. Thanks. Done. https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4925 - Jonathan M Davis

[Issue 16786] New: Tere Mere -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16786 Issue ID: 16786 Summary: Tere Mere -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbook s Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows

[Issue 16785] New: Main Hoon -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16785 Issue ID: 16785 Summary: Main Hoon -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbook s Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows

[Issue 4200] "to!real(to!string(real.min_normal))" raises std.conv.ConvError

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4200 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 16784] New: Jabse Tere -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16784 Issue ID: 16784 Summary: Jabse Tere -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbook s Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows

Re: Bot creating issues

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:34:53PM +, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 17:27:07 UTC, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote: > > Hm. > > > > There seem to be some bot generating a lot of new Issues in the D > > bugzilla. Or is that intentional?!? >

[Issue 16778] Swat Cats -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16778 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16781] Mogli -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16781 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16776] Tom -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16776 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16777] Jerry -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16777 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16782] Bageera -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16782 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16770] rang de basanti -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16770 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16775] Kandi -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16775 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16780] Mojo Jojo -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16780 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16774] Ek Do -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16774 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16769] Tu Hi Hai -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16769 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16768] kuch to hai -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16768 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

Re: Bot creating issues

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 17:27:07 UTC, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote: Hm. There seem to be some bot generating a lot of new Issues in the D bugzilla. Or is that intentional?!? It started 3 days ago, but becomming increasingly frequent - at the moment every twenty minutes a new one

Re: Bot creating issues

On Friday, November 25, 2016 17:27:07 Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Hm. > > There seem to be some bot generating a lot of new Issues in the D > bugzilla. Or is that intentional?!? Of course, it isn't. It's spam. And Brad is looking into how to deal with it. - Jonathan M

Re: the best language I have ever met(?)

On Friday, November 25, 2016 18:20:11 Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On 11/25/16 17:30, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > > On Friday, November 25, 2016 17:03:32 Artur Skawina via > >>enum T[N] staticArray(T, alias ELS, size_t N=ELS.length) = ELS; > >>auto

Bot creating issues

Hm. There seem to be some bot generating a lot of new Issues in the D bugzilla. Or is that intentional?!?

Vibe d streaming content

How can I create a streaming server where I can stream live and pre-recorded audio and video to http clients using html5 on the client end? Is it a simple matter of implementing the rtp/rtsp protocols and such along with (d)encoding or is there a lot more work?

Re: A simplification of the RvalueRef idiom

On Thursday, 24 November 2016 at 00:35:39 UTC, TheGag96 wrote: The thing that gets me more is "return" as a function attribute. I see it under "MemberFunctionAttribute" in the grammar but I can't find an explanation for its use anywhere... I've started documenting it now, will post a PR soon.

Re: the best language I have ever met(?)

On 11/25/16 17:30, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2016 17:03:32 Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-learn > wrote: >> On 11/25/16 15:51, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: >>> On Friday, November 25, 2016 14:27:39 Igor Shirkalin via >>>

[Issue 16783] std.net.curl application throws an exception

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16783 Erdem changed: What|Removed |Added CC||farukerdemon...@gmail.com

Re: Transitioning std lib modules/packages

On Friday, November 25, 2016 11:10:51 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote: > The recent discussion about std.random suggested that we need a > transitioning scheme for certain modules and packages in std that > provide different designs without breaking the existing ones. > > C++ has

[Issue 16783] New: std.net.curl application throws an exception

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16783 Issue ID: 16783 Summary: std.net.curl application throws an exception Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 03:20:24AM -0800, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2016 12:10:44 Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote: > > On 25.11.2016 11:33, Claude wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > Between "for(;;)", "while(true)" and "do while(true)", I would use the > > >

Re: ESA's Schiaparelli Mars probe crashed because of integer overflow

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 09:19:26 UTC, Alix Pexton wrote: On 25/11/2016 07:14, Patrick Schluter wrote: On Thursday, 24 November 2016 at 20:22:00 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: On 24.11.2016 20:49, qznc wrote: Although, the article [0] does not say that literally, it sounds like an integer

[Issue 16782] New: Bageera -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16782 Issue ID: 16782 Summary: Bageera -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbook s Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On 11/25/16 11:47 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Friday, November 25, 2016 10:46:15 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d wrote: On 11/25/16 8:24 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: I would point out that technically, that breaks the range API. isInputRange

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 15:46:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: This case you have of defining a popFront member variable with opCall -- don't do that, it will break things (I'm sure there are already many places where popFront is called without parens). I don't think that's a case

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On Friday, November 25, 2016 11:01:56 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 11/25/16 10:29 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > > Let's just close the book and officially put the status quo on optional > > parenthesis in stone: they are optional on zero-argument calls, > > regardless of

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On 11/25/2016 11:47 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: template isInputRange(R) { enum bool isInputRange = is(typeof( (inout int = 0) { R r = R.init; // can define a range object if (r.empty) {} // can test for empty r.popFront(); // can

Re: Transitioning std lib modules/packages

On 11/25/2016 11:39 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: The new Random module was builded in Better C concept in mind. Comparing with ndslice, random module has precompiled code. And we need to solve not only the naming problem. We need integration with dub where we can select and

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On Friday, November 25, 2016 10:03:26 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 11/25/16 8:24 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > > I would point out that technically, that breaks the range API. > > We need to change the range API then. -- Andrei We can certainly do that. I'm

[Issue 16781] New: Mogli -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16781 Issue ID: 16781 Summary: Mogli -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbook s Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On Friday, November 25, 2016 10:46:15 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 11/25/16 8:24 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > > On Friday, November 25, 2016 07:59:07 Andrei Alexandrescu via > > Digitalmars-d> > > wrote: > >> On 11/25/2016 07:53 AM, Dennis Ritchie wrote: >

Re: Transitioning std lib modules/packages

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 16:10:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: The recent discussion about std.random suggested that we need a transitioning scheme for certain modules and packages in std that provide different designs without breaking the existing ones. C++ has things like std::tr1

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 11:10:44 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: You can just as easily edit the while condition. I use it because "unconditional loop" is less silly than "loop until true is false". Unconditional loop can be implemented in 3 possible ways :) 1. skip it entirely: since there's

[Issue 16313] Duplicate symbol generated

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16313 --- Comment #1 from Jorge Lima --- Hello, I tested the code snippet with dmd-2.072.0 under Linux64bit and the problem is gone (it was still present with dmd-2.071.2). Even though this bug report was never addressed. I will test

Re: the best language I have ever met(?)

On Friday, November 25, 2016 08:26:11 Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d- learn wrote: > and opening an enhancement request to make the compiler smart enough that > > auto arr = staticArray!ubyte([1, 2, 3, 4]); > > would work. Opened: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16779 And regardless

[Issue 16780] New: Mojo Jojo -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16780 Issue ID: 16780 Summary: Mojo Jojo -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbook s Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows

Re: the best language I have ever met(?)

On Friday, November 25, 2016 17:03:32 Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On 11/25/16 15:51, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > > On Friday, November 25, 2016 14:27:39 Igor Shirkalin via > > Digitalmars-d-learn> > > wrote: > >> I think you may write it (I mean actual D)

Re: the best language I have ever met(?)

On Friday, November 25, 2016 15:59:48 Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 14:51:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > auto arr = staticArray!ubyte([1, 2, 3, 4]); > > > > doesn't compile either. The most straightforward > > implementations are something like > >

[Issue 16779] New: VRP for array literals does not work with templated functions taking a static array if the size is inferred

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16779 Issue ID: 16779 Summary: VRP for array literals does not work with templated functions taking a static array if the size is inferred Product: D Version: D2

Re: @trusted AKA most useless statement ever

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 16:03:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Hmmm... ok, that would work by means of the convention "@safe + no implementation really means trusted". Not too convenient I'd say. -- andrei It works today, though. The compiler will allow you to put @safe with no body

Re: spam in bugzilla

On 11/23/16 5:25 PM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: I've been marking the accounts as spam and moving the bugs to a specific spam product/category. The last few days have been unusual. If it keeps up, I'll investigate ways of potentially dealing with it better, but I really don't

[Issue 16771] Depreciation of implicit string concatenation in 2.072

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Transitioning std lib modules/packages

The recent discussion about std.random suggested that we need a transitioning scheme for certain modules and packages in std that provide different designs without breaking the existing ones. C++ has things like std::tr1 and #if __cplusplus >= 201103L. We also need to have separate names for

[Issue 16778] New: Swat Cats -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbooks

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16778 Issue ID: 16778 Summary: Swat Cats -18003819788-quickbooks-support-phone-number-quickbook s Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows

Re: the best language I have ever met(?)

On 11/25/16 15:51, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2016 14:27:39 Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-learn > wrote: >> I think you may write it (I mean actual D) with using some >> template like this: >> >> auto array = static_array!uint(1, 2, 3, 4) >> >>

Re: Mir Random and Dlang Ranges [Example]

On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 16:04:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/25/16 10:30 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 15:22:36 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 15:04:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I thought I agreed that a

Re: Mir Random and Dlang Ranges [Example]

On 11/25/16 10:30 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 15:22:36 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 15:04:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I thought I agreed that a noncopyable struct with opCall is fine in conjunction with a range API

Re: @trusted AKA most useless statement ever

On 11/25/16 10:30 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 15:01:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: How would this work for marking C functions assumed to be safe as trusted? -- Andrei You'd presumably just mark the prototypes as @safe too. Hmmm... ok, that would work by

Re: OT: for (;;) {} vs while (true) {}

On 11/25/16 10:29 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Let's just close the book and officially put the status quo on optional parenthesis in stone: they are optional on zero-argument calls, regardless of @property, and that isn't going to change. Agreed. -- Andrei

  1   2   >