Re: It's a Christmas miracle: main no longer runs after unittests

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 22:14:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1724 Ho-ho-ho! Andrei Given that Christmas is one of the hugest fabrications in human history, I find this very difficult to believe! (or simply to cover all bases, quite easy

Re: It's a Christmas miracle: main no longer runs after unittests

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 22:14:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1724 Ho-ho-ho! Andrei Nice, would be great to also have named unittest, so we can launch only specific ones instead of relying on third party libraries.

Re: How to initialize a associative array?

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 11:21:11 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 00:55:01 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: What's the correct way? You cannot initialize an AA at compile-time. Because AA's are provided by druntime and the ABI is not stable. For fun I'm throwing

[Issue 17029] New: [Reg 2.072] scope variable may not be returned

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17029 Issue ID: 17029 Summary: [Reg 2.072] scope variable may not be returned Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Keywords: safe

Re: It's a Christmas miracle: main no longer runs after unittests

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 22:14:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1724 The implementation is easy. The hard part is actually getting it past the "all breaking changes [except the ones i create] are evil" crowd.

Re: How to initialize a associative array?

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 11:21:11 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: You cannot initialize an AA at compile-time. Because AA's are provided by druntime and the ABI is not stable. This bit me when I was first starting out as well. I feel like there's really very little documentation on this, and

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:45:35 +, Stefan Koch wrote: > I just read over the dip, and it is a giant wall of text. > I cannot really make heads or tails of it. > Maybe you could write the advantages you hit at in short bullet-point > form ? We add the syntax: with (import foo, bar, baz)

[Issue 16794] dmd not working on Ubuntu 16.10 because of default PIE linking

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 16794] dmd not working on Ubuntu 16.10 because of default PIE linking

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 --- Comment #15 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/9fbce55814bdc8f78d6fead3243db657eafc4ec7 fix Issue 16794 - dmd not working on Ubuntu 16.10 - enable

Re: Silicon Valley D Meetup - December 22, 2016 - "The Curse of Knowledge: Et tu, D?" by Adam Wilson

On 12/23/2016 11:30 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote: (There is no audio on the recording until 45:45.) Oh, this is painful.

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:10:30 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 12/24/2016 12:45 PM, Stefan Koch wrote: >> I just read over the dip, and it is a giant wall of text. >> I cannot really make heads or tails of it. > > When it was shorter, people complained it had too little information. It's

Re: [DIP1005] Unused imports in with(import) declarations: leave alone of flag as errors?

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 20:32:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Such situations occur during refactorings and code evolution. The import is no longer used. Should the compiler flag that as an error, or leave it be? please, no. "this is a work for a linter", as Walter likes to say

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:03:26 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > * Your post provided no description of the methodology used beyond > "relatively simple regex" to come up with the magic number 26, so I > tried to use interpretation. > > * There is no answer to "where is cmp on that list for

Re: [DIP1005] Unused imports in with(import) declarations: leave alone of flag as errors?

On Saturday, December 24, 2016 15:32:58 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars- d wrote: > Consider: > > with (import std.stdio) > int fun(int x/*, File f*/) > { > // f.writeln("In: ", x); > return x * x; > } > > Such situations occur during refactorings and code evolution. The import > is

Re: D future ...

On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 04:47:06 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: CTFE ( Stefan is dealing with that ), Documentation, better Editor support... I think code-d could potentially be extended to install its dependencies, which would improve the situation there. It does already do that though

Re: Runtime error trying to call opCall on variant array of objects

On 12/24/2016 08:36 AM, aliak wrote: "Cannot apply `()' to a value of type `Command!(__lambda1, int)". I think it's failing when it checks for "!isFunctionPointer!A && !isDelegate!A". Storing delegates is a workaround. Three notes in the code: // (1) Added imports import std.variant; import

Re: Under 1000 opened bugs for Phobos

On 12/24/2016 7:24 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote: On 11/03/2015 09:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: https://goo.gl/r24Izw Replying to my own message from November 2015... well, right now we have 953 open bugs for Phobos. 500 is next! -- Andrei Progress is progress, but I

Re: Silicon Valley D Meetup - December 22, 2016 - "The Curse of Knowledge: Et tu, D?" by Adam Wilson

On 12/24/2016 07:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 12/24/16 2:30 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote: >> On 12/15/2016 12:20 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote: >> >>> https://www.meetup.com/D-Lang-Silicon-Valley/events/236253882/ >> >> The slides: >>

Re: [DIP1005] Unused imports in with(import) declarations: leave alone of flag as errors?

On 25/12/2016 9:32 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Consider: with (import std.stdio) int fun(int x/*, File f*/) { // f.writeln("In: ", x); return x * x; } Such situations occur during refactorings and code evolution. The import is no longer used. Should the compiler flag that as an

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 23:41:46 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 12/23/16 9:23 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >> The comparison to mach.d is a strawman. > > The mach.d is given as an example of the approach of breaking code into > fine-grained module. No comparison is made or implied. "Assuming

It's a Christmas miracle: main no longer runs after unittests

https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1724 Ho-ho-ho! Andrei

Re: [DIP1005] Unused imports in with(import) declarations: leave alone of flag as errors?

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 20:32:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Consider: with (import std.stdio) int fun(int x/*, File f*/) { // f.writeln("In: ", x); return x * x; } Such situations occur during refactorings and code evolution. The import is no longer used. Should the

[Issue 10023] Add rtInfo (or equivalent) to ModuleInfo

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10023 --- Comment #7 from Adam D. Ruppe --- > We are still lacking a workable idea how to make RTInfo/RMInfo customizable. Why does it have to be customizable? I think it gives enough benefit just to the runtime author (which

Re: Multiple return value as requirements for safety and performance

On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 17:28:49 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 17:15:53 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Are they already CTFEable? I have not seen an anounce, sorry They have been for years now. Of course only pointers from a CTFE context are valid at ctfe. The

[Issue 17028] Can't post via online forums

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17028 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic --- Ok found the "save" button. Sorry, doing anything D related is hard when you forget your laptop charger. :) --

[Issue 17028] Can't post via online forums

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17028 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic --- Btw does bugzilla lack a mobile-friendly interface in all recent versions? It's almost impossible to write a reply here, the submit button is hidden. It's terrible:

[Issue 17028] New: Can't post via online forums

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17028 Issue ID: 17028 Summary: Can't post via online forums Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1

Re: DMD Stdio Linker Oddities

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 19:58:45 UTC, Jake Pittis wrote: I'm posting this in Learn because I'm assuming I've done something wrong rather than discovered a bug. You need to pass all modules you use to the linker somehow. Easiest is to `dmd main.d linking_succeeds.d linking_fails.d`

[Issue 16255] std.algorithm.iteration.each on opApply doesn't support ref

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/f903de7bc6a507e787323d633679872c5c8e618c Fix issue 16255 - std.algorithm.iteration.each on

[Issue 16255] std.algorithm.iteration.each on opApply doesn't support ref

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[DIP1005] Unused imports in with(import) declarations: leave alone of flag as errors?

Consider: with (import std.stdio) int fun(int x/*, File f*/) { // f.writeln("In: ", x); return x * x; } Such situations occur during refactorings and code evolution. The import is no longer used. Should the compiler flag that as an error, or leave it be? Andrei

DMD Stdio Linker Oddities

I'm posting this in Learn because I'm assuming I've done something wrong rather than discovered a bug. Running `dmd -main main.d` with the following 3 files produces the following linker error. ``` $ dmd -main main.d Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On 12/24/2016 02:16 PM, Joakim wrote: On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 17:53:04 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:20:19 +, John Colvin wrote: There are a lot of templates in Phobos that never use the template keyword. The proposal doesn't only apply to constraints, it applies

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On 12/24/2016 02:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: With no top-level imports and all imports hoisted into inline imports, the fixed cost of importing one module will be that module alone. I'd really like to clarify this because that's where scalability comes from. The moment you need to open

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 17:53:04 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:20:19 +, John Colvin wrote: There are a lot of templates in Phobos that never use the template keyword. The proposal doesn't only apply to constraints, it applies to the whole declaration. If you

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On 12/24/2016 12:45 PM, Stefan Koch wrote: I just read over the dip, and it is a giant wall of text. I cannot really make heads or tails of it. When it was shorter, people complained it had too little information. If you're using the text form, the nicey formatted version may be helpful:

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On 12/24/2016 12:52 PM, Chris Wright wrote: On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 04:34:03 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Upon more investigation, I see a large discrepancy between the findings of DIP1005 and yours. There's no discrepancy. In part, you are misinterpreting most of what I said. Yah, I

[Issue 10023] Add rtInfo (or equivalent) to ModuleInfo

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10023 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 16794] dmd not working on Ubuntu 16.10 because of default PIE linking

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|.deb not working on Ubuntu |dmd not working on Ubuntu

32 byte vectors - first blood

Running AVX 32 bit vector code! (And getting the right results, too!) https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6358

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 17:52:04 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: The minimum isn't terribly useful because it gets to the point of testing the process scheduler and IO more than the compiler. If we want numbers that we can trust on the low end, we'll need to put timing information into the

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 04:34:03 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > Upon more investigation, I see a large discrepancy between the findings > of DIP1005 and yours. There's no discrepancy. In part, you are misinterpreting most of what I said. In part, you are assuming that imports on non-template

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:20:19 +, John Colvin wrote: > There are a lot of templates in Phobos that never use the template > keyword. The proposal doesn't only apply to constraints, it applies to > the whole declaration. If you have a better way of estimating the impact, I'd love to see it.

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 15:44:18 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 12/24/16 9:20 AM, Stefan Koch wrote: On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 14:08:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 12/24/2016 05:54 AM, Stefan Koch wrote: If that were made more lazy, we could import half of the world

Re: CTFE Status

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 16:10:04 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: Some progress on && has been made. It can now be used within an if. It is only enabled if debug = andnd is given. This introduced a bug which is now fixed. Furthermore returning of 64bit integral values has now been enabled. I

[Issue 9378] std.internal.digest.sha_SSE3 breaks if compiled with PIC

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9378 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/12c56c935c6bd0130fcb545264293cc0e500799f partly fix Issue 9378 - SHA1 asm not PIC compatible -

Runtime error trying to call opCall on variant array of objects

Hey, so I'm trying to make an variant array of objects (each one has an opCall defined) and then call each of them in succession. It doesn't seem to be working. The error I get is: "Cannot apply `()' to a value of type `Command!(__lambda1, int)". I think it's failing when it checks for

Re: CTFE Status

Some progress on && has been made. It can now be used within an if. It is only enabled if debug = andnd is given.

[Issue 17027] New: Add support for tzcnt in x86(64) iasm

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17027 Issue ID: 17027 Summary: Add support for tzcnt in x86(64) iasm Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Issue 16352] dead-lock in std.allocator.free_list unittest

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16352 --- Comment #12 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/f7e14e905b9d668ac788024f3c03c600adf0d84f Fix issue 16352 - dead-lock in std.allocator.free_list

[Issue 16626] [Reg 2.073] extreme CTFE memory usage with compile time regex

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16626 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Reg 2.073] recent dmd |[Reg 2.073] extreme CTFE

Re: Silicon Valley D Meetup - December 22, 2016 - "The Curse of Knowledge: Et tu, D?" by Adam Wilson

On 12/24/16 2:30 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 12/15/2016 12:20 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote: https://www.meetup.com/D-Lang-Silicon-Valley/events/236253882/ The slides: http://files.meetup.com/18234529/The%20Curse%20of%20Knowledge.pptx The video: http://youtu.be/XjnBMfVTI0k (There is no audio on

[Issue 15541] [ndslice] package should have detailed assert messages

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15541 greenify changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On 12/24/16 9:20 AM, Stefan Koch wrote: On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 14:08:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 12/24/2016 05:54 AM, Stefan Koch wrote: If that were made more lazy, we could import half of the world with noticing impact. That is what 1005 will bring. -- Andrei A

[Issue 12562] std.algorithm.mul

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12562 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 13371] std.math.factorial

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13371 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: Under 1000 opened bugs for Phobos

On 11/03/2015 09:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: https://goo.gl/r24Izw Some of them are D1 only; I'll make an executive decision about those soon. Some of them have been fixed or obviated by recent improvements. And finally the bulk of them need a little work each to get them fixed. I'm

String validation and sanitization dub lib

I might be working on a project which might require a lot of string pathern validation and sanitization. Planning to make that into a dub package. Currently, I am not very familiar with regex in D but I did regex stuff long ago. So if anyone has code or interest for something like that, I

[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073 greenify changed: What|Removed |Added CC||greeen...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 15437] documentation for typeof(someTemplate) == void

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15437 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||trivial

[Issue 15556] Script line missing from lexical specification

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15556 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||trivial

[Issue 15526] provide a way to ignore underscores for parsing integers

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15526 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bootcamp

[Issue 16992] fromISOString, fromISOExtString, and fromSimpleString do not have examples

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16992 Jack Stouffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@jackstouffer.com

[Issue 14608] Enum members should be formatted as a table

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14608 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073 --- Comment #9 from Andrei Alexandrescu --- We can leave hasLength as is for the time but at least new algorithms should just use $. All of these useless options left to sloppy range implementations don't bring value. --

[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073 --- Comment #8 from Jack Stouffer --- (In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #7) > I think we should require opDollar to be implemented instead. That would be a breaking change, as suddenly hasLength would fail for

Re: [OT] Screenshot of D program in the latest issue of Ct magazine

Am 24.12.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Nemanja Boric: I thought I see familiar name :-) http://imgur.com/a/TqGdj Nice! Congrats to Vladimir for getting featured there!

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 14:08:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 12/24/2016 05:54 AM, Stefan Koch wrote: If that were made more lazy, we could import half of the world with noticing impact. That is what 1005 will bring. -- Andrei A compiler enhancement can do this _without_ a

Re: Recursive-descent parsing

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 12:42:31 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: The authors of "The Art of Java" present, as a first coding example, a recursive-descent parser to demonstrate Java's ability to facilitate low level programming commonly performed in C and C++. I took the opportunity to

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On 12/24/2016 05:54 AM, Stefan Koch wrote: If that were made more lazy, we could import half of the world with noticing impact. That is what 1005 will bring. -- Andrei

Recursive-descent parsing

The authors of "The Art of Java" present, as a first coding example, a recursive-descent parser to demonstrate Java's ability to facilitate low level programming commonly performed in C and C++. I took the opportunity to port the code to D. By doing this, I now have an understanding of how a

Re: Optimization problem: bulk Boolean operations on vectors

On 12/24/2016 2:28 AM, Johan Engelen wrote: Of course, but it's not codified in the source and thus the function is different from the foreach version. More importantly, I think it is broken. I find it very hard to reason about the ptrdiff_t version, because of all the potential overflows and

Re: Optimization problem: bulk Boolean operations on vectors

On 2016-12-24 02:06, hardreset wrote: How do I get the asm output? You cannot get the assembly output from DMD since it directly outputs object code. Do get the assembly you need to use a disassembler. -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: How to initialize a associative array?

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 00:55:01 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: I tried this: immutable int[char] xx = ['Q':0, 'B':1, 'N':2, 'R':3, 'P':4]; And got a "non-constant expression" error (with or without 'immutable'). What's the correct way? You cannot initialize an AA at compile-time.

Re: Silicon Valley D Meetup - December 22, 2016 - "The Curse of Knowledge: Et tu, D?" by Adam Wilson

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 07:30:56 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 12/15/2016 12:20 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote: https://www.meetup.com/D-Lang-Silicon-Valley/events/236253882/ The slides: http://files.meetup.com/18234529/The%20Curse%20of%20Knowledge.pptx The video:

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 10:54:08 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: 300 microseconds, which is not even 0.3% of the time spent. Lexing them requires additionally also about 300 microseconds. So Together that makes up 0.6% of the time spent. Of course in the above 3% and 6% are the right numbers.

[Issue 14296] RDMD fails at building a lib when the source is in a subdir

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14296 --- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/tools https://github.com/dlang/tools/commit/e245e29d8bebe4d3965dbee40216135df513bccf Fix Issue 14296 - RDMD fails at building a lib when the

[Issue 16962] rdmd --build-only --force -c main.d fails: ./main: No such file or directory

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16962 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 16962] rdmd --build-only --force -c main.d fails: ./main: No such file or directory

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16962 --- Comment #16 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/tools https://github.com/dlang/tools/commit/b6ec807712a452a47f712364b86d02335af2a93f Fix Issue 16962 - rdmd --build-only --force -c main.d

[Issue 16978] [REG2.072.0] pragma(lib) is broken with rdmd

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16978 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/tools https://github.com/dlang/tools/commit/a9aba0067cc9604588b71877eb390df106f8abe7 Fix Issue 16978 - [REG2.072.0] pragma(lib) is broken with

[Issue 14296] RDMD fails at building a lib when the source is in a subdir

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14296 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 16626] [Reg 2.073] recent dmd nightly runs out of memory building Higgs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16626 --- Comment #4 from Martin Nowak --- Wasn't fully resolved by the PR. https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4877#issuecomment-257186040 --

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 09:34:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: (I confirm that importing std.traits, std.meta, and std.range.primitives together takes 10ms.) while compiling std.traits 6 files are opened and read into memory, taking roughly 300 microseconds, which is not even 0.3%

[Issue 14608] Enum members should be formatted as a table

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14608 --- Comment #9 from Sönke Ludwig --- Yes, fixed for /library/. I think I just didn't close this right away at the time because it still isn't fixed for /phobos/. --

[OT] Screenshot of D program in the latest issue of Ct magazine

I thought I see familiar name :-) http://imgur.com/a/TqGdj

Re: Optimization problem: bulk Boolean operations on vectors

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 00:04:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 12/23/2016 3:35 PM, Johan Engelen wrote: On Friday, 23 December 2016 at 22:11:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: enum SIZE = 1; void foo(int* a, int* b) { int* atop = a + 1000; // should be `a + SIZE`, right?

[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@erdani.com

Re: ModuleInfo, factories, and unittesting

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 09:31:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2016-12-23 15:20, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Wouldn't it just be glorious if that magically printed: test.d(4): Assertion failure (a == b) is false a = 0 b = 1 Or if there was a language feature that allowed us

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On 12/23/2016 09:23 PM, Chris Wright wrote: [abbreviated below] Upon more investigation, I see a large discrepancy between the findings of DIP1005 and yours. So there are a number of claims here, which I'll summarize: tldr: the performance impact of this DIP would be too small to easily

Re: ModuleInfo, factories, and unittesting

On 2016-12-23 15:20, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Wouldn't it just be glorious if that magically printed: test.d(4): Assertion failure (a == b) is false a = 0 b = 1 Or if there was a language feature that allowed us to do this in a library, and a bunch of other things. I wonder what

Re: ModuleInfo, factories, and unittesting

On 2016-12-23 16:09, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: sometimes i confess i want to write a new druntime. maybe i'd call it "dango" Hehe, druntime is the only part that was shared between Tango and Phobos/druntime for D2. -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: ModuleInfo, factories, and unittesting

On 2016-12-23 18:09, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Well clearly some changes in the compiler and/or runtime could bring us to where we want to be. Yeah, something like RTInfo but for modules. There's already an issue reported for this since a couple of years ago [1]. [1]

Re: DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 02:23:53 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: Appendix A: templates that would receive 'with(import foo)' in Phobos. I used a relatively simple regex to look for this. If someone put more than one line between a template and its constraints, or comments with certain

Re: ModuleInfo, factories, and unittesting

On 2016-12-23 18:12, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: It looks like a solid traditional approach. It would be great to explore approaches where D's unique features would bring a strategic advantage. I had hoped that D's unique features good be used on top of that low level library. -- /Jacob

Re: Listing downloads number in dub registry

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 08:41:26 UTC, aberba wrote: Currently, its hard to choose a lib because there is no way of knowing how many people use it. This should have been opened at the dub-registry repo ;-) In particular your request already exists, see e.g.

Listing downloads number in dub registry

Currently, its hard to choose a lib because there is no way of knowing how many people use it.

[Issue 17026] New: std.conv.emplace could be @safe if the constructor is so

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17026 Issue ID: 17026 Summary: std.conv.emplace could be @safe if the constructor is so Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW