On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 22:12:32 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:41:28 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
... That's not what I consider to be "simple" (Hard to read
IMO).
struct DblRep
{
mixin(bitfieldString([
BitFieldDesc(Type.Ulong, "fraction", 23),
BitFieldDesc(Type.Ush
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:58:01 UTC, Ali wrote:
How do you use D?
One work project a few years ago, and many side projects. rdmd
makes D my "scripting" language of choice.
In work, (key projects or smaller side projects)
The need for single executable with the speed of C prompted me to
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:58:01 UTC, Ali wrote:
How do you use D?
I mostly use it for personal projects and used it several times
for homework.
In work, (key projects or smaller side projects)
Still don't have a job :)
in your side project, (github, links please)
I'm creating a parasitic
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 21:47:32 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 14:44:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1012 is titled "Attributes".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1012.md
Thanks in advance to all who participate.
Destroy!
My primary points
* Don'
How do you use D?
I use D for building GTK applications, my current project is an
open source Linux terminal emulator called Tilix
(https://github.com/gnunn1/tilix)
In work, (key projects or smaller side projects)
Side projects only.
Did you introduce D to your work place? How? What cha
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 22:12:32 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:41:28 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
... That's not what I consider to be "simple" (Hard to read
IMO).
struct DblRep
{
mixin(bitfieldString([
BitFieldDesc(Type.Ulong, "fraction", 23),
BitFieldDesc(Type.Ush
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:41:28 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
... That's not what I consider to be "simple" (Hard to read
IMO).
struct DblRep
{
mixin(bitfieldString([
BitFieldDesc(Type.Ulong, "fraction", 23),
BitFieldDesc(Type.Ushort, "exponent", 8),
BitFieldDesc(Type.Bool, "sign",
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 14:44:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1012 is titled "Attributes".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1012.md
Thanks in advance to all who participate.
Destroy!
My primary points
* Don't formally deprecate the keywords, there is not enough
justific
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 07:49:02 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
Someone made an interesting proposal to C++:
https://herbsutter.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/p0707r1.pdf
Thoughts?
Looks like a hybrid between imperative and declarative macros.
It's natural for C++ to add lots of syntax, but declara
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:58:01 UTC, Ali wrote:
How do you use D?
I'm an economics professor. A lot of my work requires simulations
and other tasks for which a slow language just won't work. I need
good integration with C and the ability to call my programs from
other languages. D is a
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 18:48:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/28/2017 11:02 AM, Anton Fediushin wrote:
> not with Go/Rust. They're good programming languages
I really don't want to be in a position to diss other languages
but with some experience, I can tell you that I agree with blog
po
Ali wrote:
How do you use D?
ZX Spectrum emulator. Q2-like gfx engine. alot of 2d platformers, based on
dynamic AABB trees tech. Secret Project of porting FPC platformer engine to
D. highload TCP server. coding *all* my projects exclusively in D for at
least 2.5 years now. converted some C
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 18:24:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:38:10PM +, Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Not necessarily. Perhaps "IR" is the wrong term to use, as in
compiler parlance it means something very close to machine
code, but the idea is that
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:58:01 UTC, Ali wrote:
How do you use D?
I use it for everything I can. In the past, I have used it for
work as my main job on web apps, though right now my work usage
of D is limited to helper apps (it has a legacy ruby on rails
codebase I am forced to work with
On 2017-07-28 09:49, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
Someone made an interesting proposal to C++:
https://herbsutter.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/p0707r1.pdf
Thoughts?
Since no one else has mentioned it yet, I'm going to: it looks
suspiciously like AST macros :).
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 07/28/2017 11:02 AM, Anton Fediushin wrote:
> not with Go/Rust. They're good programming languages
I really don't want to be in a position to diss other languages but with
some experience, I can tell you that I agree with blog posts about Go
being a disservice to programmers.[1] It is a go
On 2017-07-28 12:30, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
This was arguably the most talked about keynote in ACCU history. I had to
close the questions after 75 minutes, and even then it went on longer.
Quite unfortunate that the questions did not appear in the video.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:38:10PM +, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 17:18:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >
> > But having a standardized IR that's available at the language level
> > gives you much, much, more possibilities than merely metaclasses.
> > You woul
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:58:01 UTC, Ali wrote:
How do you use D?
For personal projects, from low-level system hacking (like
implementing own reference counted struct) to high-level web apps.
just to learn something new? (I would easily argue that
learning D will make you a better C++ p
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 17:18:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
But having a standardized IR that's available at the language
level gives you much, much, more possibilities than merely
metaclasses. You would be able to define foreach loops for
ranges without baked-in compiler support, for example
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 07:49:02AM +, Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Someone made an interesting proposal to C++:
> https://herbsutter.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/p0707r1.pdf
>
> Thoughts?
This is very interesting, both as a subject in and of itself, and also
in terms of the enthusias
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 16:44:24 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 11:04:23 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
One option to solve the out contract ambiguity and aid parsing
by tools is to require 'do' after out contract expressions. It
allows the syntax `out(expression) do {...}`, e
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 11:04:23 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
One option to solve the out contract ambiguity and aid parsing
by tools is to require 'do' after out contract expressions. It
allows the syntax `out(expression) do {...}`, even when
expression is a single identifier that should be i
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 16:04:00 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:41:28 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:12:29 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:09:32 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:46:46 UTC, Stefan Koch w
On Thursday, 13 July 2017 at 12:45:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[ ... ]
Hi Guys I just fixed another bug that had me puzzled for a while.
The following function
ulong swap(ulong val)
{
ulong result;
result |= (val & 0xFF) << 56;
result |= (val & 0xFF00) << 40;
result
Ali wrote:
So
How do you use D?
mostly by invoking dmd or rdmd.
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:58:01 UTC, Ali wrote:
While the Orgs using D page is very nice ... I hoping to hear
more personal stories ...
So
How do you use D?
Privately whenever I need a program for something and D is the
right tool for the job.
in your side project, (github, links ple
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:41:28 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:12:29 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:09:32 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:46:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:39:04 UTC, 12345swordy w
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:12:29 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:09:32 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:46:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:39:04 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
[...]
Yes we can do that with mixins __traits and ct
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 15:09:32 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:46:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:39:04 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 07:49:02 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
Someone made an interesting proposal to C++:
https://h
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:46:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:39:04 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 07:49:02 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
Someone made an interesting proposal to C++:
https://herbsutter.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/p0707r1.pdf
Thoughts?
While the Orgs using D page is very nice ... I hoping to hear
more personal stories ...
So
How do you use D?
In work, (key projects or smaller side projects)
in your side project, (github, links please)
just to learn something new? (I would easily argue that learning
D will make you a better C
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 14:39:04 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 07:49:02 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
Someone made an interesting proposal to C++:
https://herbsutter.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/p0707r1.pdf
Thoughts?
Can D achieve this "metaclasses" using templates and mixin
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 07:49:02 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
Someone made an interesting proposal to C++:
https://herbsutter.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/p0707r1.pdf
Thoughts?
Can D achieve this "metaclasses" using templates and mixins? I
not familiar of any features that D can use to enforced
On 28.07.2017 13:04, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Friday, 21 July 2017 at 13:51:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1009 is titled "Improve Contract Usability".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1009.md
I think the proposed in/out expression contracts should require pure
expressions.
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 12:40:06 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 at 17:48:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/26/2017 6:29 AM, Kagamin wrote:
Should we still try to mark them safe at all?
Marking ones that are safe with @safe is fine. OS APIs pretty
much never change.
New t
On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 at 17:48:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/26/2017 6:29 AM, Kagamin wrote:
Should we still try to mark them safe at all?
Marking ones that are safe with @safe is fine. OS APIs pretty
much never change.
New technologies and new features get introduced over time: 64
On Tuesday, 25 July 2017 at 19:22:11 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I understand that you apply D keywords to C types in a
best fit fashion, to get some errors from the compiler when
you use them in the wrong context. It should work alright in
some APIs (maybe you can show me an example).
I currently
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 11:45:21 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 01:50:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Should public have @ on it? Should static have @ on it? What
about scope, const, or shared?
If they are storage classes, they shouldn't have @. If they are
statement
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 01:50:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Should public have @ on it? Should static have @ on it? What
about scope, const, or shared?
If they are storage classes, they shouldn't have @. If they are
statement or expression keywords, they shouldn't have @. Things
like tha
On Friday, 21 July 2017 at 13:51:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1009 is titled "Improve Contract Usability".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1009.md
I think the proposed in/out expression contracts should require
pure expressions. In the rare case that impurity is required,
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 07:49 +, Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Someone made an interesting proposal to C++:
> https://herbsutter.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/p0707r1.pdf
>
> Thoughts?
Herb did the closing keynote at ACCU 2017 on this, the video just had the
embargo released. See https:
On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 at 09:45:07 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
import std.stdio,std.string,std.algorithm,std.conv;
void main(){
readln.split.fold!((stack,op){
switch(op){
static foreach(c;"+-*/") case [c]:
return stack[0..$-2]~mixin("stack[$-2] "~c~"
stack[
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 01:30:28 UTC, sarn wrote:
To be totally honest, as it stands it feels like architecture
astronautics:
https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2001/04/21/dont-let-architecture-astronauts-scare-you/
Yeah, I think you nailed it. This DIP does seem to come from a
'what is the sm
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 23:52:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:32:12PM +, Moritz Maxeiner via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Yes, and therefore "you already have much bigger things to
worry about than D services hanging". That you're ignorant of
the compromise does
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 07:50:43 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 14:44:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1012 is titled "Attributes".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1012.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP
should occur in this threa
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 14:44:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1012 is titled "Attributes".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1012.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
occur in this thread. The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET
on August 10
Someone made an interesting proposal to C++:
https://herbsutter.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/p0707r1.pdf
Thoughts?
48 matches
Mail list logo
