On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:01:16 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:12:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
An interesting project.
Some good points made too.
As someone new to D, I th
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:25:32 UTC, Michael V. Franklin
wrote:
That turned me off. Despite everything I hate about D, I keep
coming back to it for the "Modeling Power" and "Modern
Convenience". No other language that I'm aware of can complete
with D on those two merits.
...
Mike
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:12:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
https://github.com/zig-lang/zig/wiki/Why-Zig-When-There-is-Already-CPP%2C-D%2C-and-Rust%3F
"D has @property functions, which are methods that yo
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:12:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
An interesting project.
Some good points made too.
As someone new to D, I think this point stood out the most(for
me):
"C++, Rust, and D ha
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 23:30:18 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
A DIP is necessary for all language changes. In this case a
short and well-argued DIP seems to be the ticket. Walter and I
spoke and such a proposal has a good chance to be successful.
Subject issues:
https://issues.dlan
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 20:22:21 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Hmmm, i get home to find eight messages from codebaby, he sees
sockpuppets everywhere, snapping at every bit of bait I laid...
says he'll ignore my whole comment and then replys to it
another two times, LOL, a full on meltdown and
On 11/13/2017 05:19 AM, Mark wrote:
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 18:27:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 05/18/2017 11:18 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
I just got around to watching Eduard Staniloiu's talk at DConf [1]
about the collections library he was working on. One thing seemed
odd, in that
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:55:59 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 18:11:45 UTC, Ali wrote:
I think HAA seems like where many people are looking at the
moment
I am not convinced that this will make a dent in C or C++
popularity or usage
but, yet, it will be a sizable niche that C or C++ will not
dominate
But how is that relevan
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:12:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
https://github.com/zig-lang/zig/wiki/Why-Zig-When-There-is-Already-CPP%2C-D%2C-and-Rust%3F
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2017-11/ms
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 17:00:56 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
But no plans to add meta-programming or type system support for
memory?
Hm, the github page says «Zig has no macros and no
metaprogramming», but their homepage says «Generic data
structures and functions» and «Compile-tim
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 13:43:20 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 20:14:17 UTC, Meta wrote:
The functionality is probably a good idea, but a library
solution is doable today without any acrobatics.
Show me a library solution that works fine with IDE completion
(so for
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:30:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Glancing over what they say there, it sounds like they're
trying to write a better version of C.
Yes http://ziglang.org/:
«Zig competes with C instead of depending on it. The Zig Standard
Library does not depend on libc.»
T
On Monday, November 13, 2017 16:12:42 Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
> have looked at D features:
>
> https://github.com/zig-lang/zig/wiki/Why-Zig-When-There-is-Already-CPP%2C->
> D%2C-and-Rust%3F
Glancing over what they say there,
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:27:10 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 14:11:50 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
At my job, I put together a database migration tool for our
services. It scans for resources in your JAR file with an
appropriate path, interprets them as SQL s
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
https://github.com/zig-lang/zig/wiki/Why-Zig-When-There-is-Already-CPP%2C-D%2C-and-Rust%3F
These recent articles also mention D or talk about some similar
features:
http://videocortex.io/2017/Bestiary/
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 14:44:55 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
The commenting out case can be prevented by making ?: an actual
operator, so ?/**/: would be an error.
Yes, that sounds reasonable.
(Also I think it's regressive to argue invalid code becoming
valid is a good reason to prevent
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 05:20:39 UTC, codephantom wrote:
I just saw this about the new 'damnit' operator, for C# 8.
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/556
The principle is a good one - by default you cannot dereference
something that can be null, you get a compiler error ins
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 13:02:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 10:12:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
All it does is take the expression
x ? x : y
and make it
x ?: y
Yes, that is an issue because it means that typos no longer are
caught. E.g. if you acc
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:39:07 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:34:00 UTC, realdonaldtrump
wrote:
Lol now I know ur full of it cause real football is only found
in America.
With their cute little helmets. I love it.
We don't need no helmets over here.
Oh..a
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:34:00 UTC, realdonaldtrump
wrote:
Lol now I know ur full of it cause real football is only found
in America.
With their cute little helmets. I love it.
We don't need no helmets over here.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:34:00 UTC, realdonaldtrump
wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:50:20 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I wish I was young again. I used to love arguing about
pointless crap, i couldn't resit it, mac vs p
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:50:20 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I wish I was young again. I used to love arguing about
pointless crap, i couldn't resit it, mac vs pc, risc vs cisc,
sony vs nintendo, utd vs liverpool
utd and l
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
that just works for most everyone else. And yes you hate
Micros
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I wish I was young again. I used to love arguing about
pointless crap, i couldn't resit it, mac vs pc, risc vs cisc,
sony vs nintendo, utd vs liverpool
utd and liverpool? just bunch of little kiddies kicking around a
ball.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:46:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Considering you kept ignoring my evidence of Android and
jumping to Apple, I'd say that it was perfectly accurate.
Oh well, I'm focusing on what I am interested in… Anyway, it is
rather obvious that subjective ad-hominem statements in
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:33:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:26:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I accurately characterized the tenor of their problem
Uhm… «accurately» ?? LOL!! 8'D
Considering you kept ignoring my evidence of Android and jumping
to Apple,
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I'm old and don't give a shit .
Perhaps it's all that *snorting*...that stuff will do that to you.
Go see your local doctor, cause I believe there's something you
can take..to get it all flowing again...
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:26:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I accurately characterized the tenor of their problem
Uhm… «accurately» ?? LOL!! 8'D
generalize and point that out, ie he _was_ confused in the
points he was making.
I am never confused, but this is dlang.org, I've seen worse…
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:26:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I'm not sure why you're picking out my comments from arguments
I had with Ola and Tony days ago at the end of all this, but we
had OT conversations about OS market share where I felt they
were repeatedly making the same mistake.
After
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
that just works for most everyone else. And yes you hate
Micro
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
that just works for most everyone else. And yes you hate
Micro
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:56:05 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1185516
*snort* scientific yeah.. he called you names, so you called
him names, so he called you names.. every child in the
playground knows that game.
A bit less *snorting* and perhaps you'd
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:56:05 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1185516
*snort* scientific yeah.. he called you names, so you called
him names, so he called you names.. every child in the
playground knows that game.
a bit less *snorting* and maybe you'd be
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:51:33 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
That's it little fella let it all out...
*passes codebaby a tissue*
really?
you think that was a useful contribution?
who are you anyway?
One of Jerry's 'other' accounts perhaps?
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 03:48:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/8/2017 1:36 PM, Joakim wrote:
You don't want to own up to the fact that
Please refrain from berating others here.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 03:54:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/10/2017 3:28 AM, Joakim wrote:
Yo
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 18:27:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 05/18/2017 11:18 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
I just got around to watching Eduard Staniloiu's talk at DConf
[1]
about the collections library he was working on. One thing
seemed
odd, in that Eduard seems to be saying that the
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 01:14:32 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:47:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:41:32 UTC, Jerry wrote:
harassing people isn't defending your argument.
Yeah...it's not nice...being harassed..is it.
You have to
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:47:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:41:32 UTC, Jerry wrote:
harassing people isn't defending your argument.
Yeah...it's not nice...being harassed..is it.
You have to be harassed to know what if feels like.
That was my objective. N
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 14:11:50 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
At my job, I put together a database migration tool for our
services. It scans for resources in your JAR file with an
appropriate path, interprets them as SQL scripts, and applies
them to the database if it hasn't been done ye
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 16:09:48 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
please don't answer messages which are possibly spam.
Try this by not answering to this thread.
Ok! +1 ;)
41 matches
Mail list logo
