On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 15:40:20 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-04-29 16:42, dd886k wrote:
[...]
Looks like "putchar" is inlined [1]. That means the "putchar"
you're referencing is not the one in the C standard library but
it's implemented in druntime. That means you need to link wit
On Monday, 30 April 2018 at 02:43:44 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
If the data involved classes then the answer is no, as there is
a bug regarding destroy as it involved external finalized c
function. I'm writing a DIP draft that address this.
I think I can get around that by storing the data in d
On Monday, 30 April 2018 at 02:21:37 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote:
Some components of my game engine would benefit from lookup
trees. I tried to port one from Go, but either I messed up
something bit that certain parts of the codes just won't
execute for some reason, or the algorithm was poorly
d
On Monday, 30 April 2018 at 02:21:37 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote:
Some components of my game engine would benefit from lookup
trees. I tried to port one from Go, but either I messed up
something bit that certain parts of the codes just won't
execute for some reason, or the algorithm was poorly
d
Some components of my game engine would benefit from lookup
trees. I tried to port one from Go, but either I messed up
something bit that certain parts of the codes just won't execute
for some reason, or the algorithm was poorly documented, and it
will only optimize on one end of the binary sea
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 14:13:01 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 13:14:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
In the newsgroups, there was a post in March on "ost to pst
convertes", which looks like it could have been flagged with
spam (it no longer appears on the fo
On 4/29/2018 8:40 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Looks like "putchar" is inlined [1]. That means the "putchar" you're
referencing is not the one in the C standard library but it's
implemented in druntime. That means you need to link with
druntime/phobos, it's not enough to link with the C standard lib
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 15:40:20 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I don't know why it was done this way. Perhaps it's just a
macro on some platforms.
At least ms, glibc and freebsd provide it as a function.
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 15:52:11 UTC, dd86k wrote:
It's all fine now. I'll type away my own bindings in a separate
source file (stdc.d).
You can also just do it in the usage module, for the individual
functions you need. I do this a lot for various C libraries (and
used to for the Win32 f
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 15:14:25 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
This issue has nothing to do with -betterC or extern(D).
You can get this same issue without it added if you don't link
against phobos/druntime.
Oh heh I think you're right. It is only an issue when linking and
by default it do
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 15:40:20 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I don't know why it was done this way. Perhaps it's just a
macro on some platforms.
I think it's to better integrate with normal D code (thread
safety, which explains the stdin is tagged with shared (TLS)).
It's all fine now.
On 2018-04-29 16:42, dd886k wrote:
Hello!
This is my first time posting, so do feel free to correct me and this post.
I started writing in D around Q2 2017 and recently been re-writing some
of my projects as betterC (entirely!).
I noticed something weird. It started with DMD 2.074.0 and it's
On 30/04/2018 3:05 AM, dd86k wrote:
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 14:55:06 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
I just checked, extern(D) isn't at fault. You actually do want name
mangling for wrapper functions like that.
Re-externing what I need as C is wasted productivity, IMO.
Did you only -I the fi
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 14:55:06 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
I just checked, extern(D) isn't at fault. You actually do want
name mangling for wrapper functions like that.
Re-externing what I need as C is wasted productivity, IMO.
Did you only -I the file? If you compile it in normally, it
On 30/04/2018 2:42 AM, dd886k wrote:
Hello!
This is my first time posting, so do feel free to correct me and this post.
I started writing in D around Q2 2017 and recently been re-writing some
of my projects as betterC (entirely!).
I noticed something weird. It started with DMD 2.074.0 and it
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 14:42:39 UTC, dd886k wrote:
Hello!
Embarrassingly enough, I just noticed I made a typo to my usual
username.
Hello!
This is my first time posting, so do feel free to correct me and
this post.
I started writing in D around Q2 2017 and recently been
re-writing some of my projects as betterC (entirely!).
I noticed something weird. It started with DMD 2.074.0 and it's
still an issue for me in DMD 2.0
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 13:14:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
In the newsgroups, there was a post in March on "ost to pst
convertes", which looks like it could have been flagged with
spam (it no longer appears on the forum), with two "ad-like"
responses, and a third is from notna, which
On 2018-04-28 19:39, User wrote:
Dwt is nice, but no glade like gui editor. when using dwt, I build gui
manually.
You might be able to use WindowBuilder [1] and port the Java code to D.
[1] https://www.eclipse.org/windowbuilder/
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2018-04-28 12:02, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Probably the closest thing to cross-platform building would be through
LDC, as LLVM already includes everything for C cross compilation.
Except for a C standard library.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2018-04-28 10:49, Rel wrote:
Something like memcpy and similar stuff is easy to implement.
If we are talking about Linux stuff like open, malloc and etc
can be implemented either by using syscalls or by generating
the binding to the libc.so of some minimal version that we
decide to support (l
On 4/29/18 8:58 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 10:45:56 UTC, notna wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm wondering... is no one else using it or did I miss that someone
already raised the same question...
Since days I get a
"""
403(Forbidden)
You have tried to access a restricted
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 10:45:56 UTC, notna wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm wondering... is no one else using it or did I miss that
someone already raised the same question...
Since days I get a
"""
403(Forbidden)
You have tried to access a restricted or unavailable resource,
or attempted to circ
Hi folks.
I'm wondering... is no one else using it or did I miss that someone
already raised the same question...
Since days I get a
"""
403(Forbidden)
You have tried to access a restricted or unavailable resource, or
attempted to circumvent server security.
Error details:
You're banned!
24 matches
Mail list logo
