On Friday, 9 January 2015 at 13:50:29 UTC, eles wrote:
https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/44278/debunking-stroustrups-debunking-of-the-myth-c-is-for-large-complicated-pro
From the link: Let's show Stroustrup what small and readable
program actually is.
Alright, there are a lot a
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 22:50:33 UTC, bearophile wrote:
And the @disable this() assures that a struct is correctly
initialized by the constructor.
In the statement: @disable this()
May I understand that you're disabling the default
constructor of the struct to use your own constructor?
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 13:56:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Right. So the instance data of the struct is more likely
correct when you call its methods.
Thanks. - Well I'd like to see more of these tips. My current
code in D looks like C++ and of course I sure that I'm not
extracting the
On Sunday, 2 November 2014 at 20:49:00 UTC, Kornel wrote:
What learning materials do you recommend ??
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/
Matheus.
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 16:07:38 UTC, MachineCode wrote:
I'm very surprise. If they either equal or fast sometimes the
compiler did great optizations or it's just a multicore
processor that's helping or what else? the first version (from
your post, the one using ranges) change in each
Hi,
I don't know if I'm missing something but I did some tests with
the popFront and popBack version:
bool isPalindrome(R)(R range)
if (isBidirectionalRange!(R))
{
while (!range.empty){
if (range.front != range.back) return false;
range.popFront();
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 11:48:37 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
And in my benchmark test, the first version is 3x slower than
the second one.
I forgot to say that I'm compiling with DMD without any compiler
hints/optimizations.
Matheus.
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 13:30:05 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 11:51:42 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
I forgot to say that I'm compiling with DMD without any
compiler hints/optimizations.
Try compiling with DMD flag
-release
and perhaps also
-release -noboundscheck
to
On Friday, 18 April 2014 at 20:02:41 UTC, Tim Holzschuh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Hi there,
I try to remove all equal elements of an array, thus [2,2] --
[2].
I thought this maybe would be possible with
std.algorithm.reduce, but at least the way I tried it doesn't
work:
arr.reduce(
On Saturday, 19 April 2014 at 17:12:10 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/19/2014 09:55 AM, MattCoder wrote:
On Friday, 18 April 2014 at 20:02:41 UTC, Tim Holzschuh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
void main(){
int myfilter(int a){
static int[] b;
That static variable makes this
10 matches
Mail list logo
