On Friday, 10 May 2024 at 00:18:16 UTC, Andy Valencia wrote:
tst7.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression `e in
this.members` of type `bool*` to `bool`
tst7.d(15): Error: template instance `tst7.Foo!uint` error
instantiating
I'm getting this for this bit of source (trimmed from the
On Tuesday, 12 March 2024 at 16:20:29 UTC, matheus. wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 March 2024 at 14:52:32 UTC, Mike Shah wrote:
...
I really think D would be a wonderful first language. Fast
feedback, no need to manage memory, and easy to use built-in
data structures would make for a nice intro
On Thursday, 25 January 2024 at 15:03:41 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
On Monday, 22 January 2024 at 23:28:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Of course, ultimately, different programmers have different
preferences, and none of us are going to be happy about
everything in any language.
It's not
On Wednesday, 21 September 2022 at 10:40:42 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 September 2022 at 10:39:27 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
DIP 1043, "Shortened Method Syntax", has been accepted.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1043.md
That's awesome! Congrats to
On Monday, 1 August 2022 at 23:35:13 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
This is the definition of "filter" function, and I think it
called itself within its definition. I'm guessing how it works?
'''D
template filter(alias predicate)
if (is(typeof(unaryFun!predicate)))
{
/**
Params:
range =
On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 12:02:02 UTC, Dom Disc wrote:
Hello.
I found in the documentation functions declared like this:
```D
pure @nogc @safe BigInt opAssign(T : BigInt)(T x);
```
This is a template function, even if T is constrained to always
be BigInt (it may also include anything that
On Wednesday, 9 March 2022 at 12:06:40 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 March 2022 at 10:08:50 UTC, meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 March 2022 at 09:04:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.099.0, ♥ to the 100 contributors.
This release comes with __traits(parameters), unittests
On Wednesday, 9 March 2022 at 09:04:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.099.0, ♥ to the 100 contributors.
This release comes with __traits(parameters), unittests only
from root modules, throw expressions, and plenty of more
changes.
http://dlang.org/download.html
On Tuesday, 8 March 2022 at 14:29:07 UTC, rushsteve1 wrote:
Hello! I thought I would give an update on `trash-d`, the
utility that I've been writing in D for the last several months.
https://github.com/rushsteve1/trash-d
Previous announcement thread:
On Tuesday, 1 March 2022 at 15:37:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 3/1/22 07:19, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 March 2022 at 13:15:09 UTC, meta wrote:
>
>>
>> enum Color
>> { GRAY }
>>
>> void setColor(Color color);
>>
>> setColor(GRAY);
>
> Then that defeats the purpose of
On Tuesday, 1 March 2022 at 12:29:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/1/22 7:22 AM, meta wrote:
If the type is ``Color`` I think the compiler should allow
``GRAY`` if it is a member of ``Color``, isn't how strong
statically typed language should work? I wonder what is the
rational
If the type is ``Color`` I think the compiler should allow
``GRAY`` if it is a member of ``Color``, isn't how strong
statically typed language should work? I wonder what is the
rational against it? How hard would it be to allow it?
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 at 11:53:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
### Vladimir
Vladimir opened with a progress report. Back in December, [we
discussed migrating our Bugzilla issues to
Github](https://forum.dlang.org/post/wnnwxyjtizvhyswwq...@forum.dlang.org). An alternative solution is to
Is the source of 'run.dlang.io' available somewhere?
A trick i use often:
```D
import std;
void main()
{
import uni = std.uni;
writeln("Learning D is fun".split!(uni.isWhite));
}
```
Under-rated way of importing things, you don't bloat your scope
anymore
On Thursday, 10 February 2022 at 20:34:29 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/10/2022 12:06 AM, Mathias LANG wrote:
I think an *immediate* improvement we could make to ease
people's life is to make `auto` peel the outermost qualifier
level inside functions.
So that:
```D
const int* ptr;
auto p2 =
Why do we even bother with `in` when we can do:
alias In(T) = const scope T;
void test(In!int n) {
pragma(msg, typeof(n));
}
?
onlineapp.d(3): Deprecation: storage class `scope` has no effect
in type aliases
const(int)
...oh
On Friday, 17 September 2021 at 10:31:34 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 16 September 2021 at 20:53:34 UTC, Elmar wrote:
Hello D community.
I was browsing the `__traits` keywords and I found `isFuture`
whose descriptions says something about `@future`-annotated
variables.
On Friday, 30 April 2021 at 13:42:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/30/21 9:24 AM, Meta wrote:
My point is that I think marking the *function* nothrow is not
correct, it's the second parameter that dictates the throwing
of the result.
And you can probably fix the second parameter to
On Thursday, 29 April 2021 at 20:00:23 UTC, novice2 wrote:
i dont understand why (templates too dificult for me yet),
but if i comment "lazy" from T2,
then compiler allow add "nothrow" to "ifThrown"
```d
CommonType!(T1, T2) ifThrown(E : Throwable = Exception, T1,
T2)(lazy scope T1 expression,
On Friday, 30 April 2021 at 13:05:00 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/29/21 1:50 PM, Meta wrote:
The reason for this, apparently, is in the definition of
`ifThrown`:
```
CommonType!(T1, T2) ifThrown(E : Throwable = Exception, T1,
T2)(lazy scope T1 expression, lazy scope T2
On Thursday, 29 April 2021 at 16:02:20 UTC, novice2 wrote:
Hello.
I need use std.format.format() in nothrow function.
format() can throw.
For this case i have special default string.
I don't want embrace format into try..catch block,
and i found elegant std.exception.ifThrown.
But DMD say
On Thursday, 8 April 2021 at 18:01:56 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 8 April 2021 at 12:19:29 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
```d
string to01String(int[] x) @safe
{
auto conv = x.to!(ubyte[]); // allocates new array, so
later cast to string is OK
conv[] += '0'; // assume all numbers are 0-9,
On Thursday, 8 April 2021 at 12:19:29 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
```d
string to01String(int[] x) @safe
{
auto conv = x.to!(ubyte[]); // allocates new array, so
later cast to string is OK
conv[] += '0'; // assume all numbers are 0-9, then this
gives the correct result
return (()
On Wednesday, 7 April 2021 at 17:31:09 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 April 2021 at 17:04:56 UTC, novice2 wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 April 2021 at 13:43:18 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
So, you should change your code to
writefln("%-(%s, %)", s);
sorry i dont read docs so carefully
On Saturday, 27 March 2021 at 20:44:12 UTC, Brad wrote:
I was looking through lots of sample code on Rosetta Code. D
has a lot of solutions out there. That is really nice but it
has me wondering - coming from other languages that do not
support the concept of immutability - do real world
On Sunday, 14 March 2021 at 05:31:27 UTC, Max Haughton wrote:
On Sunday, 14 March 2021 at 03:25:28 UTC, starcanopy wrote:
On Saturday, 13 March 2021 at 21:33:20 UTC, Meta wrote:
It's pretty neat, but a DIP has to be drafted and approved for
it to be enabled by default, right? (Unless I missed
On Saturday, 13 March 2021 at 21:15:40 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.096.0, ♥ to the 54 contributors.
This release comes with improved ABI compatibility for complex
types, clarified copy constructor and postblit interaction,
optional libunwind based backtraces,
On Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 04:57:19 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 03:39:15 UTC, Meta wrote:
class Human {
static immutable MAX_AGE = 122;
bool alive = true;
int age = 0;
//Error: mutable method onlineapp.Human.checkAge is not
callable using a const
class Human {
static immutable MAX_AGE = 122;
bool alive = true;
int age = 0;
//Error: mutable method onlineapp.Human.checkAge is not
callable using a const object
invariant(checkAge());
void growOlder()
in(alive)
out(; checkAge())
{
age++;
On Tuesday, 9 March 2021 at 15:21:26 UTC, Mergul wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 March 2021 at 14:29:37 UTC, Meta wrote:
Awesome! In the demo, I noticed that if there are >3000
entities spawned, there will be periodic dips in the FPS.
Could this be Javascript's GC kicking in?
What browser are you
On Tuesday, 9 March 2021 at 16:36:31 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
That's impressive, and shows the D capabilities, the future is
WASM!!! glad to see D ready for it!
Yes, I forgot to mention this, but WASM support out of the box is
awesome!
On Monday, 8 March 2021 at 19:45:58 UTC, Mergul wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm glad to announce release of my Bubel ECS
library.
Bubel ECS is Entity-Component-System architectural pattern
implementation in D language.
Library aims to delivery fast and flexible architecture for
developing games.
On Sunday, 28 February 2021 at 11:56:28 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.096.0 release, ♥ to
the 53 contributors.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.096.0.html
As usual please report any bugs at
https://issues.dlang.org
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 07:07:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
When I emailed Walter and Atila to officially launch the Formal
Assessment of DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", I
expected it would be three or four weeks before I received
their final decision. So I was surprised when
On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 11:33:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm very, very happy that I can finally announce the news. Some
of you may recall the job announcements I put out on the blog
back in September [1]. Symmetry Investments offered to fund one
full-time, or two part-time, Pull
On Monday, 28 December 2020 at 17:31:21 UTC, Murilo wrote:
In the past 2 weeks we went from 225 to 240 members in our
Facebook
group(https://www.facebook.com/groups/ProgrammingInDlang), an
average of a person per day. First it was an average of a
person per month or less. I wonder if someone
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 21:19:02 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 21:09:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 20:40:39 UTC, Seb wrote:
[...]
Okay, fair enough. Should this still not have had approval
from either Walter or Atila before being merged in? Or is
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 20:40:39 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 18:29:14 UTC, Meta wrote:
I've read the discussion but skipped the presentation. All I
see is Atila expressing distaste for the compiler choosing how
to pass values, and no explicit sign-off from either
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 20:37:04 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 18:29:14 UTC, Meta wrote:
If W or A did approve it and I just wasn't aware, then I
apologize and retract my objection.
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11000#issuecomment-675605193
As far as I
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 16:19:48 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/1/20 10:36 AM, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 09:49:36 UTC, Mathias LANG
wrote:
Author here. The most complete way to know would be to read
the changelog:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 09:49:36 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
Author here. The most complete way to know would be to read the
changelog: https://dlang.org/changelog/2.094.0.html#preview-in
The TL;DR is that, in addition to `const scope`, `in` now
automatically behaves as `ref` when "it makes
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 23:53:36 UTC, claptrap wrote:
So you have opBinary and half a dozen operators to implement.
Do you use a separate method for each operator or do you have
one method and a big static if else if to select code path?
I assume they are functionally equivalent? So its
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 13:45:56 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 12:00:30 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 12:00:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Symmetry Autumn of Code 2020 is on! My latest news post on
the D Blog talks about that, some D Language Foundation
On Wednesday, 17 June 2020 at 11:50:27 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Should a range-compliant aggregate type realizing a parser be
encoded as a struct or class? In dmd `Lexer` and `Parser` are
both classes.
In general how should I reason about whether an aggregate type
should be encoded as a
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 12:22:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/29/20 12:53 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
The subject says it all.
If you care about memory safety, I recommending adding `safe:`
as the first line in all your project modules, and annotate
individual functions otherwise as
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 at 18:19:00 UTC, Meta wrote:
mixin template magic()
{
alias CallerRet = typeof(return);
CallerRet magic()
{
return CallerRet.init;
}
}
Small edit: you can remove the "CallerRet" alias by doing the
following:
mixin template magic()
{
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 at 17:11:53 UTC, learner wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 at 16:41:06 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
typeof(return)
Thank you, that was indeed easy!
Is it possible to retrieve also the caller return type?
Something like:
```
int foo() {
return magic();
}
auto
Unlike C/C++, char is not a numeric type in D; It's a UTF-8 code
point:
import std.traits;
void main()
{
pragma(msg, isNumeric!char); //Prints false
}
On Monday, 6 April 2020 at 21:23:22 UTC, Quantium wrote:
Are there any libraries to creade a simple discord bot using D?
And if you know these libraries, could you day me their pros
and cons?
I've used https://github.com/b1naryth1ef/dscord to build a
Discord bot, a little over a year ago.
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 01:00:40 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter, Mike, and I are happy to announce that our paper
submission "Origins of the D Programming Language" has been
accepted at the HOPL IV (History of Programming Languages)
conference.
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 18:07:19 UTC, Arine wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 09:34:23 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/26/2020 7:41 AM, Arine wrote:
Yah, what's unwanted about that?
1. unwanted extra string allocation
2. poor performance
3. doesn't work with printf
4. doesn't
On Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 17:11:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
There needs to be a variant of "mansplaining" modified for
Python users.
Agreed, and there also needs to be a variant of prison, modified
for people who post dumb comments on Hacker News.
On Wednesday, 8 January 2020 at 21:58:29 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 09:43:05PM +, Meta via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...]
Deprecated module std.experimental.all was removed
All symbols contained in Phobos can now be used with import std
Maybe I'm wrong
On Tuesday, 7 January 2020 at 10:30:09 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.090.0, ♥ to the 48 contributors.
This release comes with the ability to convert lazy parameters
to delegates, new intrinsics to force rounding to specific
floating point precision, unittest builds that no
On Wednesday, 25 December 2019 at 01:24:52 UTC, Adnan wrote:
Does the compiler automatically pass values by reference if
possible with `in` parameters in higher level of optimization
flags? I would normally use `in ref` but sometimes it's not
compatible with different types.
No. "in" is
On Wednesday, 11 December 2019 at 20:08:37 UTC, Meta wrote:
import std.algorithm;
import std.range;
void mapAccepter(E)(InputRange!E r)
{
import std.array: array;
import std.stdio: writeln;
auto collected = r.array;
writeln(collected);
}
void main()
{
int[] nums = [1, 2,
On Sunday, 8 December 2019 at 01:10:21 UTC, AA wrote:
I'd like to accept the return type of map. From some previous
questions that I should accept a template?
So for something like:
```
void mapAccepter(Range)(Range r)
{
import std.array : array;
import std.stdio : writeln;
auto
On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 22:11:39 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 17:45:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The thing is, `void` means "no return type" (or "no type" in
some contexts), i.e., void == TBottom in that case.
Not *quite* correct. void is not a bottom type; it's a unit
On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 17:45:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The thing is, `void` means "no return type" (or "no type" in
some contexts), i.e., void == TBottom in that case.
Not *quite* correct. void is not a bottom type; it's a unit type,
meaning that it's a type with only 1 value (as is
On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 17:10:04 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 2 December 2019 at 20:30:49 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
In short use `in(false)` when you `override` a function to
inherit the contract, unless you explicitly want to expand the
input - which you shouldn't do when implementing
On Monday, 2 December 2019 at 20:30:49 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
In short use `in(false)` when you `override` a function to
inherit the contract, unless you explicitly want to expand the
input - which you shouldn't do when implementing an interface!
Wrote about it in more details here:
On Sunday, 3 November 2019 at 16:55:36 UTC, Vinod K Chandran
wrote:
Hi all,
I can do this in C++. #include
using namespace std ;
#define end };
#define log(x) cout << x << endl
#define wait std::cin.get()
int main() {
log("Trying to avoid the visual clutter aused by closing
curly
On Sunday, 20 October 2019 at 06:06:48 UTC, TheGag96 wrote:
Hi, all. I wanted to get into the world of 3DS homebrew, but I
really didn't feel like coding in C or C++. So, through an
effort of sheer will, I somehow got a hello world example
written in D up and running, along with bindings for
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 09:46:49 UTC, aliak wrote:
It's better to link straight to an item on hackernews as links
on the front page disappear very fast.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21257943
Cheers,
- Ali
HN has this (IMO) ridiculous policy of going to great lengths to
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 02:59:58 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I was curious how C++17's std::variant compared to the options
we have in D, like Algebraic and SumType, so I did a simple
comparison of the generated assembly for each of them. You can
read about it at the link below. And as you
On Monday, 22 July 2019 at 14:03:15 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Francesco Mecca ha written an experience report for the D Blog
about his SAOC 2018 project, porting Leandro Lucarella's old GC
from D1 to D2.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/wp-admin/post.php?post=2148=edit
Reddit:
>
On Wednesday, 17 July 2019 at 13:56:38 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hello,
Edi and myself are glad to announce that the first edition of
the D Summer School that we organized for the students at the
University Politehnica of Bucharest has just ended.
We had 8 practical sessions and a hackathon,
On Tuesday, 11 June 2019 at 17:12:17 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Is there a simple and elegant way to do this? Or is just using
a foreach(...) with canFind() the best way?
There are two versions of find that can find a range within
another:
On Friday, 24 May 2019 at 16:51:11 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 24.05.19 18:19, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 24 May 2019 at 13:30:05 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
[...]
My `puts`s might not do any harm, but they could just as well
be buffer overflows.
Could you please give an example of how @system
On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 21:57:51 UTC, Meta wrote:
I see what you're getting at. The compiler sees a slice type
(i.e., Data[]), knows that it's GC-backed and thus has infinite
lifetime, and concludes "the data you're trying to put in the
store has too long of a lifetime".
Should be "too
On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 18:45:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, May 17, 2019 11:25:40 AM MDT Meta via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I don't want to *restrict* the lifetime of a heap allocation.
I want the compiler to recognize that the lifetime of my
original data is the same
On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 20:59:43 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 17:03:51 UTC, Meta wrote:
If you look at `main` above, `rawData` has the same lifetime
as the `dataRange` struct returned from `makeDataRange` and
the queue returned from `copyToQueue`. True, there is some
On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 05:27:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/16/2019 9:50 PM, Meta wrote:
Walter, can I get you to take a look at this post I made a few
months ago, and the contained example? I feel that this is a
case that *should* definitely work, but I'm not sure if it can
*currently*
On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 17:05:21 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 17.05.19 14:10, Meta wrote:
Your explanation was fine, but I need a good solution, other
than wrapping the array assignment in @trusted.
I see. As far as I understand DIP 1000, it's not supposed to
enable your use case without having
On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 05:32:42 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 05:22:30 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
My assessment (which could be wrong):
`scope` and `return` only apply to pointers and `ref`s. If
you remove all `scope` and `return` attributes from the
function `push`,
On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 05:22:31 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 17.05.19 06:50, Meta wrote:
Walter, can I get you to take a look at this post I made a few
months ago, and the contained example? I feel that this is a
case that *should* definitely work, but I'm not sure if it can
*currently* work -
On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 at 08:32:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/15/2019 12:21 AM, Dukc wrote:
Could be worth a try even without docs, but in the long run we
definitely need some explaining.
True, but I've tried fairly hard with the error messages.
Please post your experiences with them.
On Friday, 26 April 2019 at 06:34:26 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
BTW, at least two people have promised money outside
BountySource to have 5710 fixed:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/gjzrklkxfmgjjdfor...@forum.dlang.org
--
Simen
And my offer still stands. Suleyman, do you have an email address
On Wednesday, 17 April 2019 at 22:37:38 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 April 2019 at 19:07:46 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Perhaps try some of these flags [1] and [2].
oooh, those are very interesting too.
What I was kinda hoping is it would have stats for which file
and line of
On Saturday, 23 March 2019 at 05:04:58 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Also, does it only apply to @safe code, so that I have to start
annotating stuff with @safe in order to benefit from it?
T
As per the DIP and from my experience, yes.
On Saturday, 16 March 2019 at 03:47:43 UTC, Murilo wrote:
Does anyone know if when I create a variable inside a scope as
in
{int a = 10;}
it disappears complete from the memory when the scope finishes?
Or does it remain in some part of the memory? I am thinking of
using scopes to make
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 04:43:21 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 3/14/19 8:38 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
One of the items on my list of "things I'd like to do if I
only had the time" is to create a Mud server with D and deploy
it with Docker. Just for kicks. If I ever do get around
On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 18:02:31 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 12:38:30 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
One of the items on my list of "things I'd like to do if I
only had the time" is to create a Mud server with D and deploy
it with Docker. Just for kicks. If I
On Sunday, 10 February 2019 at 20:04:29 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is there a way to query if the -dip1000 flag has been passed to
the compiler? I need it for enabling certain DIP-1000 escape
analysis tests only when -dip1000 has been passed.
For instance
static assert(!__traits(compiles, {
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 01:02:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Yeah. It would be like trying to do something like
alias x = this.x;
As it stands, I believe that super is always either used as a
function call to the constructor or to mean the this pointer
for the base class. I don't
On Monday, 28 January 2019 at 22:17:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/28/19 3:28 PM, Jonathan Levi wrote:
On Sunday, 27 January 2019 at 09:31:46 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Sunday, 27 January 2019 at 05:37:57 UTC, Jonathan Levi
wrote:
This works in LDC *but not* DMD?
. . .
Is this a bug in
On Friday, 25 January 2019 at 19:14:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 25 January 2019 at 19:11:59 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Flipcause donors are not American. Did you have trouble? If
so, you can go to the donation page and use the PayPal link.
Sorry:
On Saturday, 19 January 2019 at 22:09:57 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 19:55:34 UTC, Meta wrote:
Great read Ron. Can I ask which town in Newfoundland it was
where you stayed back in 1985?
Sure. I was in St. Lawrence on the Burin Peninsula. Do you know
it?
On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 16:42:15 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Just to set the record straight, I only had access to that
Coleco Adam for the few weeks I was in that Newfoundland
outport. Within a year, I too had my very own C-64 plugged into
a monster Zenith console job. Remember those? I
On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 01:15:06 UTC, Bill Baxter wrote:
Gotta laugh at Ruby being listed as "Underrated", though.
--bb
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:25 PM Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
Of possible interest:
On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 01:59:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Bartosz Milewski is a C++ programmer and a Haskell fan. He once
gave a presentation at NWCPP where he wrote a few lines of
Haskell code. Then, he showed the same code written using C++
template metaprogramming.
The Haskell
On Friday, 4 January 2019 at 16:21:16 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 4 January 2019 at 15:43:41 UTC, Meta wrote:
Awesome; funding goal reached in a little less than 2 months.
I didn't even get around to donating yet, so maybe I'll save
it for the next one instead.
On a related note, D
On Friday, 4 January 2019 at 10:30:07 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Saturday, 10 November 2018 at 16:09:12 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
[...]
Please read the blog post for more details:
https://dlang.org/blog/2018/11/10/the-new-fundraising-campaign/
On Tuesday, 11 December 2018 at 20:44:28 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 December 2018 at 15:34:28 UTC, Simen Kjærås
wrote:
I believe a reasonable case can be made for .! for UFCS - it's
currently invalid syntax and will not compile, and ! is the
symbol we already associate with template
On Tuesday, 11 December 2018 at 10:45:39 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
A few things that have annoyed me about writing D lately:
https://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2018/12/11/what-d-got-wrong/
Template lambdas and better eponymous template syntax are the two
big ones that I would really like.
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 01:08:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
@implicit is just there because of the fear of breaking a
theoretical piece of code that's going to be extremely rare if
it exists at all and in most cases would continue to work just
fine even if it did exist.
- Jonathan
On Monday, 24 September 2018 at 09:19:34 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 02:05:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
With regards to D1 users who are unhappy with D2, I think that
it makes some sense to point out that a subset of D2 can be
used in a way that's a lot like D1,
On Tuesday, 11 September 2018 at 15:08:33 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have finished writing the last details of the copy
constructor DIP[1] and also I have published the first
implementation [2]. As I wrongfully made a PR for the DIP queue
in the early stages of the development of
On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 20:25:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I propose:
- 'assume': aborts on false condition in debug builds, not
checked in
release builds, used as optimizer hint;
- 'insist': aborts on false condition in debug builds, aborts
on false
condition in release
1 - 100 of 1356 matches
Mail list logo
