On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 18:19:30 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
(There seems to be a rule that all mobile keyboards
manufactured after about 2005 MUST be terrible. Heck, you can
barely find ones with halfway-decent *arrow keys* anymore, let
alone realistically usable home/end/etc (which mobile
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 11:35:19 UTC, Chris wrote:
Are we mad or just passionate?
Yes.
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 19:15:29 UTC, ponce wrote:
Now you have another problem, how do you know that something
"looks good" from a design point of view for inclusion in
std.experimental? Reviews like for Phobos inclusion? Especially
with no users at this point.
It's an experiment; simp
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 15:44:11 UTC, Meta wrote:
Yes, I think this is a good case where making things slightly
harder for users is good. If someone has to think twice about
using std.experimental because of the long name, then they'll
probably also think twice about how their code might
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 13:34:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Minor point -- is it really going to be the clunky
std.experimental, or is it going to be something elegant like
exp.* ... ?
I would prefer the latter. :-)
I think I would too. But failing that, sin
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 18:19:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/27/14, 7:59 AM, MachMit wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 13:06:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
...However, I cannot really come up with a single situation
where I
don't know what kind of allocator I have used when acc
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 14:03:05 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
Dart compiles to JS, but drops support for IE9 after this
summer… so it isn't a mono culture, but you do depend on Google
strategic planning by using Dart.
As I understand it, you take a substantial performance hit for
doing
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 20:34:31 UTC, Etienne wrote:
My position has changed, and I now think D would be in a better
position if it ran in the Dart VM.
Even if I _were_ a Chrome user, I'd have precisely zero interest
in a browser monoculture. To wit, [P]NaCl and Dart effectively
don't
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 19:56:20 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
I just read the first chapters, and according to that, existing
local gcs needs write barriers, so we are back to my second
proposal. The implementation in the paper even adds read
barriers.
At this point, I suspect write barri
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 06:06:40 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
This comes up from time to time, but to me it is very blurry
how this can work in reality.
The paper I linked on Friday [0] presents a collector like this.
Are there concerns I've missed that make that not applicable?
Conside
On Friday, 9 May 2014 at 16:12:00 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Let's also bear in mind that Java's GC is worlds ahead of D's.
Is Sun/Oracle reference implementation actually any good?
I am getting very tired of repeating myself and having my points
basically ignored, or dismissed with
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 18:02:46 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
It never occurred to you that people's libraries would be
published as part of a centralised repository with a tool that
manages dependencies?
Hate to be the cynic, but how in the world do you expect people
to even know about Dub or
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:39:45 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
The Obj-C thing as an example. Granted, it's a huge feature and
has extensive implications. The Authors have said themselves
that they agree it's not 'ready' for inclusion... so, what? It
sits and rots? I think it needs an ex
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 16:48:50 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 15:45:32 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
The name should indicate what you get (the calculating of a
result), not
how the framework obtains it (sequential scan).
Making complexity an impleme
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 13:52:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 13:38:28 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
But still, one person's productivity is too subjective to
focus a lot on IMO.
Calculated dishonesty is healthy in a marketing campaign :p
Put another way, one dat
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:38:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
void main()
{
auto safeCallback = (string user, string pass = "hunter2")
{
writefln("The password is: '%s'", pass);
};
I'm sorry, but can you explain how this lets an attacker learn
anything
On Friday, 18 April 2014 at 16:40:32 UTC, Aleksandar Ruzicic
wrote:
I have 27'' monitor with resolution of 2560x1440 and
Yeah, me too...
left-aligned websites are really hard to read!
...so I have no idea what you're even talking about with this
statement.
There is a reason why most edit
On Friday, 18 April 2014 at 14:04:04 UTC, Aleksandar Ruzicic
wrote:
So, what do you guys think?
I _strongly_ suggest any proposed redesign retain the
left-justification seen in the current design. It improves
readability and gives opportunities for better information
density.
I know centr
201 - 218 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
