Am Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:49:57 +0100
schrieb Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
:
> There should be ways to catch ABI changes in the build or test process.
> Maybe I'm misremembering something though. :-)
>
> There should be a degree of ABI compatibility between releases
On 16 November 2015 at 09:30, Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Am Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:49:57 +0100
> schrieb Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
> :
>
> > There should be ways to catch ABI changes in the build or test process.
> > Maybe
Am Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:24:18 +
schrieb Chris Piker :
> On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> > I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
> > poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
> > results to create a
Am Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:26:54 +
schrieb Marc Schütz :
> I'm interested in this topic, too. Has there been a conclusion as
> to distributions should install includes and libraries of
> different compilers (and versions), which sonames to use, etc?
The shared library topic
On 16 Nov 2015 7:35 am, "Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> Am Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:24:18 +
> schrieb Chris Piker :
>
> > On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> > > I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now,
On 16 Nov 2015 8:15 am, "Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> Am Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:26:54 +
> schrieb Marc Schütz :
>
> > I'm interested in this topic, too. Has there been a conclusion as
> > to distributions should install includes and
On Wednesday, 11 November 2015 at 17:24:19 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 01:01:34 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:03:42 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com:
AFAIK you can't put shared libraries into a different
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:34:25 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com:
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 01:01:34 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:03:42 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0100
schrieb Johannes
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 15:07:57 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
That requires co-operation from upstream compiler projects...
distributors
are free to have local patches by all means to force the
compilers to look
in non-standard directories. ;-)
Well, you have co-operated with me
On 12/11/13 21:06, Dicebot wrote:
dlang should supersede d in all domains, it is a simple matter of ambiguity
(I, personally, won't change it whatever poll results are)
I suggest the opposite -- if d is up for grabs, we should grab it and hold on
to it. Ambiguity is best overcome by creating
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 13:50:45 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:23:17 +0100
schrieb Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise
wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:11:17 +0100
schrieb Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 13:50:45 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I don't want to be limited to one installation of Phobos.
That's why there is no none option. It is required to have
e.g.:
On 12/11/13 20:50, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
I'm not sure a poll is the appropriate way to decide this, to be
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:02:46 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:11:17 +0100
schrieb Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 13:50:45 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I don't want to be limited to one installation of Phobos.
On Nov 14, 2013 8:40 PM, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com wrote:
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:02:46 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:11:17 +0100
schrieb Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 13:50:45 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com:
AFAIK you can't put shared libraries into a different folder.
The runtime linker must be able to find the libraries so the folders
have to be registered in ld.so.conf. But ld 'virtually merges' all
directories so you
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:03:42 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com:
AFAIK you can't put shared libraries into a different folder.
The runtime linker must be able to find the libraries so the folders
have
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 04:35:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
I don't see why we need such sub-directories. The language
doesn't seem important to me.
I also place the source under /usr/src since they actually
aren't headers/import files.
Mostly hygiene concerns. One of reasons why
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:23:17 +0100
schrieb Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:53:10 +0100
schrieb Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 04:35:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
I don't see why we need such sub-directories. The language
doesn't seem important to me.
I also place the source under /usr/src since they
On 13 November 2013 13:53, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 04:35:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I don't see why we need such sub-directories. The language doesn't seem
important to me.
I also place the source under /usr/src since they actually aren't
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=52828149e4b06cfb69b97527
--
Marco
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 20:06:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all
27 matches
Mail list logo