On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 14:21:18 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
D is a superset of go's functionality aside from the structural
typing (which in my opinion is a huge fail for a variety of
reasons you will see if you try to use it for anything
extensive). If you don't want to learn about
I was recently told by a commercial D user, that using D helps
them to more easily identify good programmers.
It would be nice, if not just D users had this attitude :-)
It's also a bit like that for Scala when companies look for Java
people. Alas, Scala is a bit overloaded ...
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:44:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually think that there are two large categories of
programmers: those like writing the same loops over
On 2015-03-27 19:27:37 +, Martin Nowak said:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 19:00:16 UTC, Chris wrote:
Also, and this counts for something I think, Go is a trendy
language right now, so when it comes to recruiting, I think
having Go as a critical part of Repustate’s tech stack will help.
On 2015-03-25 10:17:00 +, Bienlein said:
I recently made a pull request for a go tool and spent about half an
hour trying to find some function to test whether an array contains a
particular element.
There are libraries for this like gen:
http://clipperhouse.github.io/gen. But it also
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 15:36:16 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 10:17:01 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
I recently made a pull request for a go tool and spent about
half an
hour trying to find some function to test whether an array
contains a
particular element.
There are
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 19:00:16 UTC, Chris wrote:
Also, and this counts for something I think, Go is a trendy
language right now, so when it comes to recruiting, I think
having Go as a critical part of Repustate’s tech stack will
help.
Stop the world, I wanna get out!
I was recently
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 19:27:38 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 19:00:16 UTC, Chris wrote:
Also, and this counts for something I think, Go is a trendy
language right now, so when it comes to recruiting, I think
having Go as a critical part of Repustate’s tech stack
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 22:16:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
This blog post describes what to consider when switching from
python to go.
http://blog.repustate.com/migrating-code-from-python-to-golang-what-you-need-to-know/#tips
It's very interesting, because the long list of things to give
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:14:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
This is a funny workaround:
http://bouk.co/blog/idiomatic-generics-in-go/
And someone found a hole to implement it:
https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/2hw356/idiomatic_generics_in_go/ckwpfms
The interpretation of
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 18:33:17 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
import (
templates.Map{int, string}
)
Hahahaha.
It is crazy stuff like that that makes fringe languages more fun
to read about than the big serious ones. ;)
I recently made a pull request for a go tool and spent about
half an
hour trying to find some function to test whether an array
contains a
particular element.
There are libraries for this like gen:
http://clipperhouse.github.io/gen. But it also suffers from the
absence of generics.
trust
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 10:17:01 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
I recently made a pull request for a go tool and spent about
half an
hour trying to find some function to test whether an array
contains a
particular element.
There are libraries for this like gen:
I earn my pay with Java development. In my spare time I learn
some Scala hoping there might be some work for me with Scala in
the future. Then I need to become familiar with all kinds of
new frameworks, tools, libraries and systems that continue to
pop up every year in the JVM eco system.
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 17:21:43 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I earn my pay with Java development. In my spare time I learn
some Scala hoping there might be some work for me with Scala
in the future. Then I need to become familiar with all kinds
of new frameworks, tools, libraries and
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 20:35:31 UTC, Mengu wrote:
trust me, from an undecided but experienced developer's
perspective there are so many reasons to choose D over Go. on
the
otherhand same person has a lot more reasons to choose Go over
D.
i'm writing a very long blog post about this. if
On Sunday, March 22, 2015 02:32:36 deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:44:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually think that there are two
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 22:16:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
This blog post describes what to consider when switching from
python to go.
http://blog.repustate.com/migrating-code-from-python-to-golang-what-you-need-to-know/#tips
It's very interesting, because the long list of things to give
weaselcat weasel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually think that there are two large categories of
programmers: those like writing the same loops over and over
again and
This is a funny workaround:
http://bouk.co/blog/idiomatic-generics-in-go/
This blog post describes what to consider when switching from python to go.
http://blog.repustate.com/migrating-code-from-python-to-golang-what-you-need-to-know/#tips
It's very interesting, because the long list of things to give up for
more efficient go code reads like an argumentation against
The moment I realised that Go requires you to write loops was the
moment I decided we were done.
I actually think that there are two large categories of
programmers: those like writing the same loops over and over
again and those who use algorithms.
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 22:16:10 UTC,
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually think that there are two large categories of
programmers: those like writing the same loops over and over
again and those who use algorithms.
I agree, at
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually think that there are two large categories of
programmers: those like writing the same loops over and over
again and those who use algorithms.
I agree, at some point I learned that there is a huge cultural
distinction
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:44:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually think that there are two large categories of
programmers: those like writing the same loops over
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 02:32:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:44:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually think that there are two large
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 02:36:03 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 02:32:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:44:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 04:53:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 02:36:03 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 02:32:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:44:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak
28 matches
Mail list logo
