On Friday, 21 July 2017 at 13:03:34 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
Hi,
Whom should I contact to submit an article proposal for the D
blog?
Me: aldac...@gmail.com
Hi,
Whom should I contact to submit an article proposal for the D
blog?
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:19:38 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 11:01:49 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Thanks to everyone who provided feedback here and elsewhere.
I've incorporated much of it and that has resulted in a much
better post. I'll be publishing it in a ~ 3 hour
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 11:01:49 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Thanks to everyone who provided feedback here and elsewhere.
I've incorporated much of it and that has resulted in a much
better post. I'll be publishing it in a ~ 3 hours or so.
Sorry for the late feedback (only saw this recently), bu
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 16:07:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
So I took the feedback I've gotten so far, stepped away and
thought about it for a bit, and agreed that I was taking the
wrong approach. So I've given it a rewrite. The original gist
is still there, but the new one is here:
https://g
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 08:34:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
As a result of the ongoing thread, 'C++17 cannot beat D surely'
[1], I've slapped together a blog post about it all.
A post about CTFE sort in D by itself would be rather short. So
I also wrote about two points of the confusion (one of
On Sunday, June 04, 2017 19:16:09 ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 06/04/2017 06:07 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
> > https://gist.github.com/mdparker/51599471b5f19fe05ff01ca95b34d453
>
> From there: "What it boils down to is this: if a function *can* be
> executed at compile time, it *will* be."
>
On 06/04/2017 06:07 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
https://gist.github.com/mdparker/51599471b5f19fe05ff01ca95b34d453
From there: "What it boils down to is this: if a function *can* be
executed at compile time, it *will* be."
I think that gives the wrong impression. We regularly have newcomers in
D.
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 16:48:11 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 16:07:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
Much better, a standard overview of CTFE, but that's better for
a general audience. I'd leave out the bit about allocation
altogether, a technical detail that depends on th
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 16:07:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 08:34:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I've slapped together a blog post about it all.
So I took the feedback I've gotten so far, stepped away and
thought about it for a bit, and agreed that I was taking the
wro
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 08:34:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I've slapped together a blog post about it all.
So I took the feedback I've gotten so far, stepped away and
thought about it for a bit, and agreed that I was taking the
wrong approach. So I've given it a rewrite. The original gist i
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 08:34:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
As a result of the ongoing thread, 'C++17 cannot beat D surely'
[1], I've slapped together a blog post about it all.
A post about CTFE sort in D by itself would be rather short. So
I also wrote about two points of the confusion (one of
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 08:34:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'd like to publish it tomorrow (Monday), so I've put the draft
in a gist [2] and I'm looking to get anyone who's willing to
read it and let me know here if I've made any errors.
https://gist.github.com/mdparker/c674888dea1e0ead0c6a8
As a result of the ongoing thread, 'C++17 cannot beat D surely'
[1], I've slapped together a blog post about it all.
A post about CTFE sort in D by itself would be rather short. So I
also wrote about two points of the confusion (one of which was my
own) that arose in the thread. I'd like to pu
On 6/6/16 9:47 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Just to start out, I created a private repo on Github to help with
collaboration on the D blog theme between myself and Mike Parker. Now,
there's no reason it should be private, and everyone should be able to
see it and contribute.
So, who do I ta
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 13:47:00 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
So, who do I talk to and what do I need to do to get this on
github.com/dlang?
+1
And, if I may add, the sooner the better!
Just to start out, I created a private repo on Github to help
with collaboration on the D blog theme between myself and Mike
Parker. Now, there's no reason it should be private, and everyone
should be able to see it and contribute.
So, who do I talk to and what do I need to do to get th
On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 at 19:00:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:41:49PM +, karabuta via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
The problem I see is very few people are really aware of D as
a creation out experience and research. I hurts so bad that
there is almost nothing to fin
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:41:49PM +, karabuta via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Everyday we argue about why other languages are getting more users
> than D due to certain design decisions they make. But IMO, all those
> languages suck :). There is sugar in D, no honey!.
>
>
> The problem I see is v
Everyday we argue about why other languages are getting more
users than D due to certain design decisions they make. But IMO,
all those languages suck :). There is sugar in D, no honey!.
The problem I see is very few people are really aware of D as a
creation out experience and research. I hu
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 19:00:42 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 17:00:16 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 16:04:32 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 14:21:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 01:34:58 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Ju
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 17:00:16 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 16:04:32 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 14:21:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 01:34:58 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Just noticed this:
http://blog.octayn.net/blog/2014/06/30/
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 16:04:32 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 14:21:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 01:34:58 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Just noticed this:
http://blog.octayn.net/blog/2014/06/30/this-week-in-rust-54/
This is precisely the kind of thing we
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 14:21:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 01:34:58 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Just noticed this:
http://blog.octayn.net/blog/2014/06/30/this-week-in-rust-54/
This is precisely the kind of thing we need.
Huge amount of non-interesting effort. There was
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 14:21:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 01:34:58 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Just noticed this:
http://blog.octayn.net/blog/2014/06/30/this-week-in-rust-54/
This is precisely the kind of thing we need.
Huge amount of non-interesting effort. There was
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 01:34:58 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Just noticed this:
http://blog.octayn.net/blog/2014/06/30/this-week-in-rust-54/
This is precisely the kind of thing we need.
Huge amount of non-interesting effort. There was someone trying
to do similar digest for D but effort seems
Just noticed this:
http://blog.octayn.net/blog/2014/06/30/this-week-in-rust-54/
This is precisely the kind of thing we need.
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 10:17:26 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 00:41:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 19:41:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
whereas I'm asking about having an official blog on dlang.org
and how much interest there is from others to contribute t
would they contribute?
I would happily contribute. I always wanted to do more with my D blog
and actually ran a few interviews on it a long while ago. Never had the
energy to do more than keep up with announcements, though, in the long run.
I think an official blog with even just a handful
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 00:41:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 19:41:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
whereas I'm asking about having an official blog on dlang.org
and how much interest there is from others to contribute to
one.
This is my question, what do you expect people
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 19:41:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
whereas I'm asking about having an official blog on dlang.org
and how much interest there is from others to contribute to one.
This is my question, what do you expect people to contribute?
Release announcements are obvious. Would it mimic
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 19:41:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Yeah, that's a feed of D-related posts by people who already
have their own blogs, whereas I'm asking about having an
official blog on dlang.org and how much interest there is from
others to contribute to one.
To be honest, even if the on
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 19:13:25 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 18:41:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I've been thinking about setting one up: any interest in
having an official blog or anybody contributing? It'd have to
be a group effort, with various people writing or being
On 14/07/14 21:13, Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Well, I don't know what you'll get out of it that isn't already there with
Planet D:
http://planet.dsource.org/
I think Joakim is suggesting an official blog that speaks on behalf of the D
programming language, which is a bit different
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 18:41:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I've been thinking about setting one up: any interest in having
an official blog or anybody contributing? It'd have to be a
group effort, with various people writing or being interviewed.
Here's my earlier forum post that motivated the id
writing a series of such posts, expanding
on each of the bullet points. Right now, he'll throw something
off on the forum and it'll get buried by all the posts on here,
missed by most users. A blog is where such material could be
highlighted.
We even have a D blog engine built on vibe.d that
On 19/07/12 23:33, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
You should know Chrome displays quite a weird stub while loading that page over
a slow connection.
Ack. That'll be the way that Chrome handles embedded website fonts -- doesn't
display _anything_ until the fonts have loaded. I really must try and
Zim desktop 'wiki.'
Sounds rather stupid but it is very nice for informal style.
It uses Markdown by default and comes with inline support for 'naked'
LaTeX.
It outputs to HTML, and doesn't look half bad for a five-minute learning
curve.
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:55:06 -0500, Joseph Rushton
On 7/18/12 7:55 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Hello all,
My patches to RandomSample were accepted earlier this month (thanks to
both Jonathan and Andrei:-) so I thought I'd write a short blog post
(which turned into a very long blog post...) about random sampling, the
algorithms concerned,
On Wednesday, 18 July 2012 at 14:55:18 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Hello all,
My patches to RandomSample were accepted earlier this month
(thanks to both Jonathan and Andrei:-) so I thought I'd write a
short blog post (which turned into a very long blog post...)
about random sampling,
Hello all,
My patches to RandomSample were accepted earlier this month (thanks to both
Jonathan and Andrei:-) so I thought I'd write a short blog post (which turned
into a very long blog post...) about random sampling, the algorithms concerned,
and its implementation in D.
http://braingam.es/
A new post.. still about visual studio experience...
http://galador.net/codeblog/post/2011/05/23/Discovering-D-and-Visual-Studio-(continued%E2%80%A6).aspx
"Lloyd Dupont" wrote in message news:ir5l9r$1gvh$1...@digitalmars.com...
I just wrote an article on my blog (not much happening on it th
You ask at the right time!
After month of anemic performance and got fed-up!
I just migrated my blog to a new server which should behave much better,
hopefully!
Try again!
http://www.galador.net/codeblog/post/2011/05/20/D-for-NET-programmer.aspx
"Peter Alexander" wrote in message news:ir991l
Reddit has killed your blog!
"Server is too busy"
On 21/05/11 3:08 AM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
hay, I didn't know reddit!
some comments are quite funny!
"Walter Bright" wrote in message news:ir6aa1$2o0a$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 5/20/2011 4:58 AM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
I just wrote an article o
hay, I didn't know reddit!
some comments are quite funny!
"Walter Bright" wrote in message news:ir6aa1$2o0a$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 5/20/2011 4:58 AM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
I just wrote an article on my blog (not much happening on it though, I
confess..)
Which should explain to a .NET progr
On 5/20/11, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> and the other is that it won't compile with dmd 2.053 (or it didn't compile
> in the beta's and I don't think the repo has been updated yet.)
It was just a miss-placed line. A const variable was used before it
was declared. There's a solution in the DFL forums.
On 5/20/2011 4:58 AM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
I just wrote an article on my blog (not much happening on it though, I
confess..)
Which should explain to a .NET programmer how to have an easy and satisfying
start with D:
http://www.galador.net/codeblog/post/2011/05/20/D-for-NET-programmer.aspx
Red
Damn, I liked the idea to use the latest DMD!
Well this week I'll do more D & GUI experiment. Now that I "can compile" i
might be more productive! :)
At any rate DGui look quite nice too! Except for the lack of designer
support that is...
"Jesse Phillips" wrote in message news:ir62sb$2a64$
Lloyd Dupont Wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Hey I might give a new go at DFL then. I like Entice the designer support.
> Well I could give a go at DWT as well, so I could make my own inform
> opinion!
>
> My initial conclusion my have been skewed by the fact that I had a hard time
> jus
Thanks for the feedback.
Hey I might give a new go at DFL then. I like Entice the designer support.
Well I could give a go at DWT as well, so I could make my own inform
opinion!
My initial conclusion my have been skewed by the fact that I had a hard time
just compiling the damn thing! :)
Wi
Lloyd Dupont Wrote:
> I just wrote an article on my blog (not much happening on it though, I
> confess..)
>
> Which should explain to a .NET programmer how to have an easy and satisfying
> start with D:
>
> http://www.galador.net/codeblog/post/2011/05/20/D-for-NET-programmer.aspx
>
While I
I just wrote an article on my blog (not much happening on it though, I
confess..)
Which should explain to a .NET programmer how to have an easy and satisfying
start with D:
http://www.galador.net/codeblog/post/2011/05/20/D-for-NET-programmer.aspx
52 matches
Mail list logo
