I am stealing HerrDrFaust's question from the following Reddit thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3wqt3p/programming_in_d_ebook_is_at_major_retailers_and/
Please answer here or there.
Thank you,
Ali
On Thursday, 17 December 2015 at 17:38:31 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I am stealing HerrDrFaust's question from the following Reddit
thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3wqt3p/programming_in_d_ebook_is_at_major_retailers_and/
Please answer here or there.
Thank you,
Ali
Well,
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 00:03:06 UTC, extrawurst wrote:
What PR is that ? Link ?
--Stephan
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/5290
It adds some __traits that would make it easier for me to
introspect my binding modules and generate glue code. Right now,
I'm using
On Thursday, 17 December 2015 at 17:46:15 UTC, BLM768 wrote:
On Thursday, 17 December 2015 at 17:38:31 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
I am stealing HerrDrFaust's question from the following Reddit
thread:
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 at 14:57:17 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Regardless, my point is more about the importance of a seamless
installation on Windows than necessarily about what is required
or not.
This isn't unique to D. I just tried to install the Clang
Windows binary and I got a message
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 at 13:32:10 UTC, kink wrote:
Afaik DMD for Win64 requires the MS linker, so good luck
without Visual Studio then. Same goes for LDC on Win64,
although an LLVM COFF linker is under development. Serious
system programming on Windows without MSVC and its C runtime?
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 at 13:32:10 UTC, kink wrote:
Afaik DMD for Win64 requires the MS linker, so good luck
without Visual Studio then. Same goes for LDC on Win64,
although an LLVM COFF linker is under development. Serious
system programming on Windows without MSVC and its C runtime?
On 2015-08-11 09:08, Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d wrote:
on OSX I only see libphobos2.a (including dmd 2.068)
It's not supported on OS X.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 at 14:57:17 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Well I'm not sure what percent serious system programming is
done by other people, but I don't do any.
I understand your points. I meant to say that D is a system
programming language (too), so it's tightly coupled to some
internals
On Tuesday, 11 August 2015 at 00:56:57 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 11 August 2015 at 01:15, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
One big positive for DMD is that it is very easy to install on
Windows. Just about anyone can get up and running quite
easily. It doesn't require the
On 8/11/2015 12:57 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Also the front end transition from C++ to D hits me hard also.
It's going to hit everyone hard who works on the front end.
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 05:23:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2015 9:26 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 20:51:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2015 4:38 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 15:31, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
I agree, and
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 19:31:55 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
…[insert your language here] has a long way to go… :)
Yes, the real culprit is getting really good IDE support, and for
that one need to write a high quality analyzer that can provide
more information than a compiler.
As far
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 19:34:26 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 19:31:55 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
On 8/10/15 12:25 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
…[insert your language here] has a long way to go… :)
Which is
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 8/9/2015 12:18 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
If the libraries were shared, this would reduce linking time, which in
various
benchmarks I've done is where most small projects
On 10/08/15 14:25, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I wonder how .so files to work on those platforms? I expect iOS would
leverage OSX support almost verbatim?
Shared libraries are not supported on OS X, at least not with DMD, not
sure about LDC.
On Android, all binaries are .so files; but I
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 02:41:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
People keep talking about Rust, I'm thinking of giving it a
shot.
I feel there is something wrong with the Rust and Go agendas,
both languages have interesting features, but then they seem to
get too moralistic/political. Is there a way
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 14:13:53 UTC, Manu wrote:
I really hope this is a top-priority goal for the switch to
DDMD.
My understanding is that 2.069 is supposed to bring DDMD support.
I think there has been a lot of heated discussion about something
that really isn't that far away.
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 14:44:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Shared libraries are not supported on OS X, at least not with
DMD, not sure about LDC.
Shared libraries works well here on OS X with LDC 0.15.2-beta2
(and only with LDC).
On 8/10/15 12:25 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 02:41:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
People keep talking about Rust, I'm thinking of giving it a shot.
I feel there is something wrong with the Rust and Go agendas, both
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 19:34:26 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 19:31:55 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
On 8/10/15 12:25 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
…[insert your language here] has a long way to go… :)
Which is
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 20:20:36 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 19:34:26 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 19:31:55 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
On 8/10/15 12:25 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 19:25:45 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 02:41:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
People keep talking about Rust, I'm thinking of giving it a
shot.
I feel there is something wrong with the Rust and Go agendas,
both languages have interesting
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 19:31:55 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
On 8/10/15 12:25 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
…[insert your language here] has a long way to go… :)
Which is why I think people are attracted towards D. It's very
On 11 August 2015 at 01:15, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 14:13:53 UTC, Manu wrote:
I really hope this is a top-priority goal for the switch to DDMD.
My understanding is that 2.069 is supposed to bring DDMD support. I think
there
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 05:31:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I agree, and now we ship a Phobos DLL, resolving that issue.
I think most people these days associate DLL exclusively with
windows. I certainly do.
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 01:26:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2015 2:03 PM, ponce wrote:
Once I get back to Windows I will post the report.
Thank you.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896
On 10/08/15 10:43, John Colvin wrote:
I think most people these days associate DLL exclusively with windows.
I certainly do.
Exactly. DLL on Windows and shared library on Posix. Although I
think it's dynamic library on OS X.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 10 August 2015 at 12:29, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 10/08/15 10:43, John Colvin wrote:
I think most people these days associate DLL exclusively with windows.
I certainly do.
Exactly. DLL on Windows and shared library on Posix. Although I
On 8/10/2015 3:32 AM, ponce wrote:
On Monday, 10 August 2015 at 01:26:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2015 2:03 PM, ponce wrote:
Once I get back to Windows I will post the report.
Thank you.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896
Good!
On 10 August 2015 at 05:00, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 09/08/15 13:38, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
In fact, we've been discussing for a few months that we'd have have
another very promising opportunity to use D at work in a really
appropriate
On 10 August 2015 at 06:51, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 8/9/2015 4:38 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 15:31, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
But waiting for someone else to discover the same thing on some other
piece
of code
On 09-Aug-2015 12:33, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 13:34, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 9/08/2015 2:40 p.m., Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[snip]
Even though it is hard for you to still be here, I hope you do continue to
help D
On 09/08/15 11:04, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Do you support shared libraries on OSX with that emulated TLS system
for all use cases?
Shared libraries are not supported at all on OS X.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 9 August 2015 at 15:31, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 8/8/2015 7:40 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
1. DMD has unsatisfactory codegen for anything other than debug builds.
Do you mean the codegen is slower? But consider that the bottleneck in most
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 10:21:06 UTC, NVolcz wrote:
There seems like there are many problems with DMD and many
problems asked here in the newsgroup are answered with don't
use DMD.
Maybe it's time to deprecate DMD? Maybe at least make sure it's
up to date with the ecosystem.
Sorry didn't
On 09/08/15 09:33, Walter Bright wrote:
We ship Phobos as a shared library on Linux, OSX and FreeBSD.
No on OS X.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 02:41:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
snip /
It's not so much language problems, it's tooling problems. It's
the most important and perhaps most neglected aspect of the D
ecosystem.
1. DMD has unsatisfactory codegen for anything other than debug
builds.
2. DMD generates x87
On 9 August 2015 at 20:04, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 09-Aug-2015 12:33, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 13:34, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 9/08/2015 2:40 p.m., Manu via Digitalmars-d
On 9 August 2015 at 13:34, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 9/08/2015 2:40 p.m., Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Don't worry about it!
But I see your point. All we can do is truck on.
You will enjoy my latest blog post I think[0].
I reiterate
Am Sun, 9 Aug 2015 02:17:11 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
On 8/9/2015 2:07 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
DMD has the advantage that whenever a frontend pull request requires
glue layer changes you get at and once by the contributor. But for
LDC and GDC the glue layer
On 8/9/2015 2:33 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Sure. I'm not arguing that LDC or GDC should be the default, just
wanted to explain why we could really need some more contributors for GDC/LDC
;-)
We could use more contributors in general!
On 8/9/2015 2:25 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Now we have the testsuite, which seems to be a good enough gauge for finding
problems. However if there's been a change (eg: refactor) between what codegen
is lowered in the frontend vs. glue, then it becomes a commit hunt trawling
On 9 Aug 2015 11:35 am, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Am Sun, 9 Aug 2015 02:17:11 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
On 8/9/2015 2:07 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
DMD has the advantage that whenever a frontend pull request requires
On 9 August 2015 at 07:31, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 8/8/2015 7:40 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
1. DMD has unsatisfactory codegen for anything other than debug builds.
Do you mean the codegen is slower? But consider that the bottleneck in
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 05:18:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 02:41:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
...
This pretty much hit the nail on the head on why dmd needs
deprecated.
I'm tired of seeing 'BUT IT WORKS ON WINDOWS' as an excuse. I
don't care if it works on windows, it
On 9 August 2015 at 08:36, Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 05:18:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 02:41:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
...
This pretty much hit the nail on the head on why dmd needs deprecated.
I'm tired
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 06:59:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 08:36, Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
[...]
(Neo)Vim? :o)
[...]
Not sure which environment you refer to, but most times I've
been pinged
into discussion, the problem was
On 9 August 2015 at 09:03, rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 06:59:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 08:36, Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
[...]
(Neo)Vim? :o)
[...]
Not sure which
On 8/8/2015 11:38 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I know that at least for the benefit of std.math, we should allow any precision
without expensive casting to and from real, which has been found to be a
performance problem on various benchmarks (GDC, LDC, DMD, doesn't matter).
I
On 8/9/2015 12:18 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
If the libraries were shared, this would reduce linking time, which in various
benchmarks I've done is where most small projects spend the majority of their
time doing. But no one has as of yet come up with a feasibly implementable idea
On 8/8/2015 11:36 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 05:18:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
dmd not being deprecated continues the cycle of gdc/ldc lagging versions
behind and being understaffed in manpower.
I think another point to look at is how far gdc and ldc have come while still
On 9 August 2015 at 09:28, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 8/8/2015 11:38 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I know that at least for the benefit of std.math, we should allow any
precision
without expensive casting to and from real, which has been
On 9 August 2015 at 09:33, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 8/9/2015 12:18 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
If the libraries were shared, this would reduce linking time, which in
various
benchmarks I've done is where most small projects spend the
On 8/9/2015 12:36 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about intrinsics?
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/94f718e5c69939f595fb839d3aae24878f126d78/std/math.d#L630
There isn't a simd cosine instruction, so making cos(double) builtin
accomplishes nothing. However,
On 9 August 2015 at 09:53, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 8/9/2015 12:36 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about intrinsics?
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/94f718e5c69939f595fb839d3aae24878f126d78/std/math.d#L630
On 8/9/2015 12:51 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 09:33, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com mailto:digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 8/9/2015 12:18 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
If the libraries were shared, this
On 8/9/2015 1:05 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
This is on Windows? I'm not seeing this on Linux. http://goo.gl/58yhwU
You're seeing that on Linux because doubles are passed/returned in XMM0 on
Linux, and the only way to load XMM0 into the x87 is to pass it through a memory
On 8/9/2015 1:11 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
You're seeing that on Linux because doubles are passed/returned in XMM0 on
Linux, and the only way to load XMM0 into the x87 is to pass it through a memory
location. There's still no casting to/from real, even in that asm code.
BTW, if you want to
Am Sun, 9 Aug 2015 01:05:35 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
I don't understand your question. On Linux, TLS data is inserted into
the same section that gcc puts it. On OSX, where gcc didn't support
TLS, dmd did create it into a data segment. Every time a new thread
was
Am Sun, 9 Aug 2015 00:32:00 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
On 8/8/2015 11:36 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 05:18:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
dmd not being deprecated continues the cycle of gdc/ldc lagging
versions behind and being understaffed in
On 8/9/2015 2:07 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
DMD has the advantage that whenever a frontend pull request requires
glue layer changes you get at and once by the contributor. But for
LDC and GDC the glue layer changes have to be implemented by GDC/LDC
devs.
If LDC were the default, then the GDC
On 8/9/2015 2:04 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
That statement is too broad to be true ;-) GCC's emulated TLS doesn't
have adjacent memory for TLS variables and it works fine with D
(and the GC). It is a little bit slower than if we had adjacent memory.
OTOH this approach works with all kinds of
On 9 August 2015 at 11:07, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Am Sun, 9 Aug 2015 00:32:00 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
On 8/8/2015 11:36 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 05:18:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
dmd not
On 09-Aug-2015 15:27, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 20:04, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 09-Aug-2015 12:33, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 13:34, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
On 8/9/15 5:15 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2015 2:04 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
That statement is too broad to be true ;-) GCC's emulated TLS doesn't
have adjacent memory for TLS variables and it works fine with D
(and the GC). It is a little bit slower than if we had adjacent memory.
OTOH
On 9 August 2015 at 23:52, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 09-Aug-2015 15:27, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 20:04, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 09-Aug-2015 12:33, Manu via Digitalmars-d
On 09/08/15 15:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Where is the bugzilla issue etc :o). -- Andrei
It's been there for a while [1] ;)
[1] https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9476
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 09/08/15 13:38, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
In fact, we've been discussing for a few months that we'd have have
another very promising opportunity to use D at work in a really
appropriate context if I could rely on Android and iOS appearing
within 6-12 months or so.
There's been quite a
On 8/9/2015 4:38 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 15:31, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
But waiting for someone else to discover the same thing on some other piece
of code means you'll be waiting a long time.
I understand, but that's not sustainable.
We can't be in a
On 8/9/2015 12:59 PM, ponce wrote:
Well, for Win64 the codegen is simply wrong. I don't even care if the codegen is
fast or not, but correct should be a given. Biggest problem for me so far.
There's nothing I nor anyone else can do with comments like this.
It passes the executable part of the
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 05:18:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 02:41:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
...
This pretty much hit the nail on the head on why dmd needs
deprecated.
I'm tired of seeing 'BUT IT WORKS ON WINDOWS' as an excuse. I
don't care if it works on windows, it
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 20:24:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2015 12:59 PM, ponce wrote:
Well, for Win64 the codegen is simply wrong. I don't even care
if the codegen is
fast or not, but correct should be a given. Biggest problem
for me so far.
There's nothing I nor anyone else can
On 8/9/2015 9:26 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 20:51:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2015 4:38 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 15:31, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
I agree, and now we ship a Phobos DLL, resolving that issue.
Really? Where is
On 8/9/2015 11:50 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[1] https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9476
Thanks for helping out with this.
On 8/9/2015 2:03 PM, ponce wrote:
Once I get back to Windows I will post the report.
Thank you.
The problem is that from a selfish point of view I can better optimize for my
time and just disable optimizations in the faulty code, moving on to the next
task. A Tragedy of the commons
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 20:51:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2015 4:38 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 15:31, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
I agree, and now we ship a Phobos DLL, resolving that issue.
Really? Where is it? (I can't see it in the
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 12:27:26 UTC, Manu wrote:
Yeah, I keep coming back to it, and getting myself stuck with
various
troubles making it work good. I'm perpetually unhappy with my
code,
and I just need a really good block of time to get through it.
If people want to review std.color
On 10 August 2015 at 06:26, Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 20:51:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2015 4:38 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 9 August 2015 at 15:31, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
I agree, and now we
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 04:56:39 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
*whispers* Hey hey you. You want tests? Well here is something
you'll like[0]. Oh and check out[1].
[0] http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/pngsuite.html
[1]
http://forum.dlang.org/post/zxbexpwmirzdkewhq...@forum.dlang.org
Well
On 8/08/2015 8:05 p.m., lobo wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 04:56:39 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
*whispers* Hey hey you. You want tests? Well here is something you'll
like[0]. Oh and check out[1].
[0] http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/pngsuite.html
[1]
On Saturday, 8 August 2015 at 08:05:27 UTC, lobo wrote:
Sorry I don't mean to sound harsh but that's the reality I'm in
right now pushing D on teams in my workplace. It would be much
simpler if there were quality (idiomatic) D interfaces to
existing quality C/C++ libraries.
Have you looked
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 20:24:54 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 17:40:16 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
[...]
I wouldn't think what you're saying is controversial...just a
lot of work to do well.
[...]
+2000
On 6 August 2015 at 21:46, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 6/08/2015 11:30 p.m., Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 6 August 2015 at 21:23, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 6/08/2015 11:18 p.m., Manu via
://cattermole.co.nz/blog/uncategorized/where-goes-game-development-in-d/
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 02:41:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
...
This pretty much hit the nail on the head on why dmd needs
deprecated.
I'm tired of seeing 'BUT IT WORKS ON WINDOWS' as an excuse. I
don't care if it works on windows, it produces code slower than
interpreted lua. Exactly what use
On 8/8/2015 7:40 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
1. DMD has unsatisfactory codegen for anything other than debug builds.
Do you mean the codegen is slower? But consider that the bottleneck in most
programs is a small section of code. Taking a good look at the generated code
for that and
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:24:29 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Truth be told if we were willing to walk extra mile we'd have
proper curl/zlib experience. But linking problems plague
std.net.curl usage and both libs are permanently somewhat out
of date.
boost http is currently in review.
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:25:04 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:24:29 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Truth be told if we were willing to walk extra mile we'd have
proper curl/zlib experience. But linking problems plague
std.net.curl usage and both libs are
On 07-Aug-2015 08:08, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 7/08/2015 10:48 a.m., Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Thursday, 6 August 2015 at 06:30:06 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Here is what we need to do going forward (beyond what me and Manu are
doing):
1. Derelict-Util needs to be put into Phobos. This is not
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 05:08:27 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Ok, here is what I'm willing to do.
If you are willing to get Derelict-Util into Phobos and create
the bindings for what ever (appropriate) c-library. I'm willing
to create the wrappers around it to make it work with the
On 07-Aug-2015 11:39, Suliman wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:25:04 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:24:29 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Truth be told if we were willing to walk extra mile we'd have proper
curl/zlib experience. But linking problems plague
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:41:11 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I guess it's Boost C++ http. Certainly has nothing to do with D
and anyhow porting the whole C++ Boost (even just the relevant
parts) to D is quite an effort.
It is relevant since Boost libraries often are precursors to C++
On 07-Aug-2015 12:16, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:41:11 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I guess it's Boost C++ http. Certainly has nothing to do with D and
anyhow porting the whole C++ Boost (even just the relevant
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 09:43:13 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Already have that it's called vibe.d. There must be other stuff
floating around as well (e.g.Adam's tiny http server).
That's not what I mean. I mean being able to interface with C++
counterparts in general. E.g. use the same
On 8/08/2015 1:07 a.m., rsw0x wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 12:55:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/6/15 6:48 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
I really feel like D needs to get over it's not invented here
syndrome, a much easier path would to just use a pre existing cross
platform windowing
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 13:07:59 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 12:55:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/6/15 6:48 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
I really feel like D needs to get over it's not invented
here
syndrome, a much easier path would to just use a pre existing
cross
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 12:55:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/6/15 6:48 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
I really feel like D needs to get over it's not invented here
syndrome, a much easier path would to just use a pre existing
cross
platform windowing library.
I agree (though I don't
On 8/6/15 6:48 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
I really feel like D needs to get over it's not invented here
syndrome, a much easier path would to just use a pre existing cross
platform windowing library.
I agree (though I don't know much about which library would be the best
choice), at least on the
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 12:55:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/6/15 6:48 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
I really feel like D needs to get over it's not invented here
syndrome, a much easier path would to just use a pre existing
cross
platform windowing library.
I agree (though I don't
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
