On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 06:58:13 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 03:50:44 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 22/08/18 21:34, Ali wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 17:42:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Pretty positive overall, and the negatives he mentions are
fairly obvious to
evant here.
BTW. on the offtopic note - the thread title doesn't look too
good. Imagine being a newcomer, and the first thread you see on
the forum is titled "D is dead".
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 06:34:04 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 23/08/18 09:17, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 05:37:12 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
One that hurt me lately was a way to pass a scoped lazy
argument (i.e. - to specify that the implicit delegate need
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 03:50:44 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 22/08/18 21:34, Ali wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 17:42:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Pretty positive overall, and the negatives he mentions are
fairly obvious to anyone paying attention.
Yea, I agree, the negatives are
On 23/08/18 09:17, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 05:37:12 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
One that hurt me lately was a way to pass a scoped lazy argument (i.e.
- to specify that the implicit delegate need not allocate its frame,
because it is not used outside the function
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 05:37:12 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
Let's start with this one:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14246#c6
The problems I'm talking about are not easily fixable. They
stem from features not playing well together.
One that hurt me lately was a way to pass
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 05:37:12 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
One that hurt me lately was a way to pass a scoped lazy
argument (i.e. - to specify that the implicit delegate need not
allocate its frame, because it is not used outside the function
call).
I don't see why we just can't
On 23/08/18 09:04, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 03:50:44 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
And it's not just Weka. I've had a chance to talk in private to some
other developers. Quite a lot have serious, fundamental issues with
the language. You will notice none of them
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 03:50:44 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
And it's not just Weka. I've had a chance to talk in private to
some other developers. Quite a lot have serious, fundamental
issues with the language. You will notice none of them speaks
up on this thread.
They don't see
On 23/08/18 08:20, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 03:50:44 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
No, no and no.
I was holding out on replying to this thread to see how the community
would react. The vibe I'm getting, however, is that the people who are
seeing D's problems have
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 03:50:44 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
No, no and no.
I was holding out on replying to this thread to see how the
community would react. The vibe I'm getting, however, is that
the people who are seeing D's problems have given up on
affecting change.
It is no
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 04:59:47 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 04:44:47 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
But, again, it is interesting to see what you took from my
mail.
I think the biggest problem is lack of reviewers when making
PR:s. The fact that we have D language
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 04:44:47 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
But, again, it is interesting to see what you took from my mail.
I think the biggest problem is lack of reviewers when making
PR:s. The fact that we have D language foundation, state of D
survey, extensive autotester and
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 03:50:44 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
No, no and no.
I was holding out on replying to this thread to see how the
community would react. The vibe I'm getting, however, is that
the people who are seeing D's problems have given up on
affecting change.
It is no
On 23/08/18 07:35, Dukc wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 03:50:44 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Every single one of the people rushing to defend D at the time has
since come around. There is still some debate on whether, points vs.
counter points, choosing D was a good idea, but the
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 03:50:44 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
Every single one of the people rushing to defend D at the time
has since come around. There is still some debate on whether,
points vs. counter points, choosing D was a good idea, but the
overwhelming consensus inside Weka
On 22/08/18 21:34, Ali wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 17:42:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Pretty positive overall, and the negatives he mentions are fairly
obvious to anyone paying attention.
Yea, I agree, the negatives are not really negative
Walter not matter how smart he is, he is one man
JamesKan wrote:
Andrei wants some (he just wants money, huh). Walter? Shut it down. Count
the people engaged in this whatever it is, and if a few select
capitalize on its failure, then, who are you? There is no money in D.
None. Nada. Religions are not for profit. It's OK to worship, whoever
JamesKan Wrote:
Andrei wants some (he just wants money, huh). Walter? Shut it down. Count
the people engaged in this whatever it is, and if a few select
capitalize on its failure, then, who are you? There is no money in D.
None. Nada. Religions are not for profit. It's OK to worship,
Mike James wrote:
All the money has gone to build a large volcano complex where Walter can sit
all day stroking a white cat and plotting the downfall of C++...
Eeexcellhhhnt!!
twirls mustache
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Mike James wrote:
All the money has gone to build a large volcano complex where Walter
can sit
all day stroking a white cat and plotting the downfall of C++...
Eeexcellhhhnt!!
twirls mustache
You've grown a mustache? Perfect!
Hello Walter,
I know a guy who got pasted enough in an online forum[...]
got pasted?
--
... IXOYE
BCS wrote:
Hello Walter,
I know a guy who got pasted enough in an online forum[...]
got pasted?
It's an old expression for bombing an area to bits.
JamesKan Wrote:
Andrei wants some (he just wants money, huh). Walter? Shut it down. Count
the people engaged in this whatever it is, and if a few select
capitalize on its failure, then, who are you? There is no money in D.
None. Nada. Religions are not for profit. It's OK to worship,
On 03/28/2010 07:16 AM, JamesKan wrote:
Andrei wants some (he just wants money, huh). Walter? Shut it down. Count
the people engaged in thiswhatever it is, and if a few select
capitalize on its failure, then, who are you? There is no money in D.
None. Nada. Religions are not for profit. It's OK
On 28-mar-10, at 12:10, Bane wrote:
JamesKan Wrote:
Andrei wants some (he just wants money, huh). Walter? Shut it down.
Count
the people engaged in this whatever it is, and if a few select
capitalize on its failure, then, who are you? There is no money in D.
None. Nada. Religions are not
On 28-mar-10, at 13:20, Pelle Månsson wrote:
On 03/28/2010 07:16 AM, JamesKan wrote:
Andrei wants some (he just wants money, huh). Walter? Shut it down.
Count
the people engaged in thiswhatever it is, and if a few select
capitalize on its failure, then, who are you? There is no money in D.
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:20:57 +0200, Pelle Månsson wrote:
On 03/28/2010 07:16 AM, JamesKan wrote:
Andrei wants some (he just wants money, huh). Walter? Shut it down.
Count the people engaged in thiswhatever it is, and if a few select
capitalize on its failure, then, who are you? There is no
Do you mean this one?
What problems has D solved? (Other than providing compiler writers with
masturbatory material). Light bulb (!!!): D is a circle jerk! (Not that
there's anything wrong with that).
It has a similar tone.
Why would someone be so bitter and write so badly? Even if
Bane Wrote:
Do you mean this one?
What problems has D solved? (Other than providing compiler writers with
masturbatory material). Light bulb (!!!): D is a circle jerk! (Not that
there's anything wrong with that).
It has a similar tone.
Why would someone be so bitter and
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:55:50 -0400, superdan wrote:
jesus homies. hez a troll fer fucks sake. can't believe u r tryin' teh
communicate let alone reason with dat asstodeepthroater. all groups haz
trollz. its a sign of popularity. kudos homies but fuhget about it. u
don't reason with'em
superdan wrote:
jesus homies.
Hey, we missed you! Nice to see you back!
Walter Bright Wrote:
superdan wrote:
jesus homies.
Hey, we missed you! Nice to see you back!
yo walt. u rule.
Steve Teale steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote in message
news:hononf$1tf...@digitalmars.com...
Why would someone be so bitter and write so badly? Even if it were the
case that D was not really any more than a discussion group for ideas
about compiler design, it would still be a worthwhile
Steve Teale Wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:55:50 -0400, superdan wrote:
jesus homies. hez a troll fer fucks sake. can't believe u r tryin' teh
communicate let alone reason with dat asstodeepthroater. all groups haz
trollz. its a sign of popularity. kudos homies but fuhget about it. u
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Steve Teale steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote in message
news:hononf$1tf...@digitalmars.com...
Why would someone be so bitter and write so badly? Even if it were the
case that D was not really any more than a discussion group for ideas
about compiler design, it
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Maybe it's Bjarne Stroustrup and he's getting worried ;)
(That's only a joke, btw.)
With the troll's poor grammar and generally incomprehensible mishmash, I
seriously doubt he's an alias for an accomplished and eloquent professional writer.
Hello superdan,
Bane Wrote:
I'd put it more bluntly than some (not to you Pelle) - piss off you
anonymous prat, or be clear about your identity then we can all
judge your motives.
Steve
I agree with Steve.
jesus homies. hez a troll fer fucks sake. can't believe u r tryin' teh
communicate
Hello Walter,
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Maybe it's Bjarne Stroustrup and he's getting worried ;) (That's only
a joke, btw.)
With the troll's poor grammar and generally incomprehensible mishmash,
I seriously doubt he's an alias for an accomplished and eloquent
professional writer.
I think
Hello JamesKan,
Clearly the OP doesn't know what he's talking about so the following is mostly
for the rest of us.
There is no money in D.
Well Duh! We all known that.
Name a language that (directly) made it's creators money. (Hit: MS *gives
way* the C# compiler.) The money is in the
BCS wrote:
I think you are correct, OTOH; what better way for such a person to hide
than to forgo what they are best known for?
True, except it's really hard to hide one's writing style. It's like trying to
disguise your handwriting.
BCS wrote:
Yeah, but it you make it hard enough to read, then people won't have any
brain cycle left over to do pattern matching. /joke OTOH if you do it
wrong, they might no even read it in the first place.
It's also remarkably consistent in style with the other troll posts here, and
Andrei wants some (he just wants money, huh). Walter? Shut it down. Count
the people engaged in this whatever it is, and if a few select
capitalize on its failure, then, who are you? There is no money in D.
None. Nada. Religions are not for profit. It's OK to worship, whoever
stupid people
201 - 243 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
