On Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 14:35:00 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 14:33:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 14:32:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
- Yes, not everyone likes colors. You can turn all colors off
with a command-line switch.
Which is?
On Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 14:33:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 14:32:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
- Yes, not everyone likes colors. You can turn all colors off
with a command-line switch.
Which is?
-color=off
As with almost any other program, you can get a list of
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 14:32:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
- Yes, not everyone likes colors. You can turn all colors off
with a command-line switch.
Which is?
This times 1000
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:11 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:32:28PM +, Vladimir Panteleev via
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > As has been announced, DMD now has colorized syntax highlighting in
> > error
On Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 01:45:11 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Hasn't DMD already been coloring error messages for about the
past year? Or is it DUB that's been doing that to DMD's output?
Or are we talking about something different then what was
already there?
Please, click,
On 06/27/2017 10:32 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
As has been announced, DMD now has colorized syntax highlighting in
error messages:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/of9oao$230j$1...@digitalmars.com
With 2.075's release near, now would be a good time to decide on a nice
color palette that looks
On 28-06-17 01:34, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
All these can even do true colors on Windows:
-
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/commandline/2016/09/22/24-bit-color-in-the-windows-console/
On Windows 10, and in that case you can even use the vt100 escape
sequences:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 23:38:23 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 28.06.2017 um 01:24 schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:
And Windows?
Good point, I forgot about that and it can definitely not be
ignored. A separate 16-color theme just on Windows, however,
could still be an option.
Windows can do
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 14:32:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
- Yes, not everyone likes colors. You can turn all colors off
with a command-line switch.
- Yes, everyone agrees that having all colors be configurable
would be good. We still need defaults that are going to look OK
on most
On 2017-06-27 19:11, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The cardinal rule of color selection: NEVER only set the foreground
color or the background color alone. ALWAYS set both, otherwise you will
get invisible text (or barely-visible text, like yellow on white) on
somebody's terminal, and
On 2017-06-27 23:10, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Just ruling out a white background would be
a bad idea. I think on macOS that's the default, for example.
Yes, default background color on the default terminal emulator.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 6/27/2017 7:32 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
As has been announced, DMD now has colorized syntax highlighting in error
messages:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/of9oao$230j$1...@digitalmars.com
With 2.075's release near, now would be a good time to decide on a nice color
palette that looks
Am 28.06.2017 um 01:24 schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 23:18:18 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I mean if, by switching to more colors, we rule out few people, but
are able to provide a much better value for the (presumed) majority of
people with differently colored, but
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 23:24:42 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 23:18:18 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I mean if, by switching to more colors, we rule out few
people, but are able to provide a much better value for the
(presumed) majority of people with differently
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 23:18:18 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I mean if, by switching to more colors, we rule out few people,
but are able to provide a much better value for the (presumed)
majority of people with differently colored, but 256-color
capable terminals, then it may still be worth
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 23:18:18 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I mean if, by switching to more colors, we rule out few people,
but are able to provide a much better value for the (presumed)
majority of people with differently colored, but 256-color
capable terminals, then it may still be worth
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 19:43:03 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 19:39:25 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Please, please, please, just do the same as clang.
I don't think clang has this feature, so doing the same as
clang would be a regression. We're in uncharted waters!
Am 28.06.2017 um 00:44 schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 22:34:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I was specifically trying to steer away from a random
propose-and-comment approach, because I think we can do a lot better
if we first reduce the size of the design space using
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 22:34:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I was specifically trying to steer away from a random
propose-and-comment approach, because I think we can do a lot
better if we first reduce the size of the design space using
objective measures. If we can agree to some extent that
Am 28.06.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 22:12:42 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
[...]
(snip - as it boils down to needing a concrete proposal)
I was specifically trying to steer away from a random
propose-and-comment approach, because I think we can do a
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 22:12:42 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
[...]
(snip - as it boils down to needing a concrete proposal)
But it seems like the solution for that is to use saturated
colors for everything. There are also some examples that
clearly don't work on a white background, such as
Am 27.06.2017 um 23:45 schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 21:10:37 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Intended to be more of the latter, especially as a consequence of the
readability concern. The typical colorful syntax highlighting that is
often used (lets say like the Monokai
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 21:10:37 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Intended to be more of the latter, especially as a consequence
of the readability concern. The typical colorful syntax
highlighting that is often used (lets say like the Monokai
theme), starts to break down when it isn't used within
Am 27.06.2017 um 22:35 schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 20:19:14 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I would argue pretty strongly that this should be toned down as much
as possible.
From the perspective of a personal preference, or an objective analysis?
It sounds like the former
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 20:19:14 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I would argue pretty strongly that this should be toned down as
much as possible.
From the perspective of a personal preference, or an objective
analysis? It sounds like the former but isn't worded as one.
All example schemes in
Am 27.06.2017 um 16:32 schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:
As has been announced, DMD now has colorized syntax highlighting in
error messages:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/of9oao$230j$1...@digitalmars.com
With 2.075's release near, now would be a good time to decide on a nice
color palette that looks
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 17:11:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The cardinal rule of color selection: NEVER only set the
foreground color or the background color alone.
Fun fact: this is why terminal.d's api is `color(fg, bg)` instead
of foregroundColor and backgroundColor independently.
But, I
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 17:41:35 UTC, qznc wrote:
I'm one of the rare people who use a light background in my
terminal (like 99% of websites). It seems only dark backgrounds
are considered, which is understandable.
I also use light backgrounds... so I'm advocating for the light
bg
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 19:39:25 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Please, please, please, just do the same as clang.
I don't think clang has this feature, so doing the same as clang
would be a regression. We're in uncharted waters!
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 14:32:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
As has been announced, DMD now has colorized syntax
highlighting in error messages:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/of9oao$230j$1...@digitalmars.com
With 2.075's release near, now would be a good time to decide
on a nice color
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 18:42:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 18:41:00 UTC, Random D user wrote:
What ever you do, please don't use extreme high intensity
colors like red(255,0,0), green (0,255,0) or blue (0,0,255).
That's up to the terminal (or your
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 18:41:00 UTC, Random D user wrote:
What ever you do, please don't use extreme high intensity
colors like red(255,0,0), green (0,255,0) or blue (0,0,255).
That's up to the terminal (or your configuration of it). Without
making many assumptions, console applications
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 14:32:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
With 2.075's release near, now would be a good time to decide
on a nice color palette that looks fine on most terminals. So,
please vote:
What ever you do, please don't use extreme high intensity colors
like red(255,0,0),
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 17:41:35 UTC, qznc wrote:
Is there a way to do this globally? For example, a config file
or an environment variable?
I believe you can add -color=off to DFLAGS in sc.ini / dmd.conf.
It seems only dark backgrounds are considered, which is
understandable.
Not
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 17:28:42 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I've seen complaints from people who have black-on-white
terminals (or vice versa) finding some programs producing
unreadable text because the program set the foreground color to
black without also setting the background. Of course,
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 14:32:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
- Yes, not everyone likes colors. You can turn all colors off
with a command-line switch.
Is there a way to do this globally? For example, a config file or
an environment variable?
I'm one of the rare people who use a light
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:24:46PM +, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 17:11:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > The cardinal rule of color selection: NEVER only set the foreground
> > color or the background color alone. ALWAYS set both, otherwise you
> >
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 17:32:23 UTC, FoxyBrown wrote:
This will be a nightmare if you do not allow it to be
configurable! Hard coding anything is very bad when others are
will use it.
Make a default color scheme that works for the majority as you
are, but then allow it to be easily
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 14:32:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
As has been announced, DMD now has colorized syntax
highlighting in error messages:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/of9oao$230j$1...@digitalmars.com
With 2.075's release near, now would be a good time to decide
on a nice color
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 17:11:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The cardinal rule of color selection: NEVER only set the
foreground color or the background color alone. ALWAYS set
both, otherwise you will get invisible text (or barely-visible
text, like yellow on white) on somebody's terminal, and
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:32:28PM +, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> As has been announced, DMD now has colorized syntax highlighting in
> error messages:
>
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/of9oao$230j$1...@digitalmars.com
>
> With 2.075's release near, now would be a good time
As has been announced, DMD now has colorized syntax highlighting
in error messages:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/of9oao$230j$1...@digitalmars.com
With 2.075's release near, now would be a good time to decide on
a nice color palette that looks fine on most terminals. So,
please vote:
42 matches
Mail list logo
