On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
My implementation of the redesign is pretty much complete.
Check it out: http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
This is an implementation of a design done by one Ivan Smirnov,
brought forward by Jacob Carlborg [1].
The dark forum widgets
On 12.01.2016 08:24, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Nice. Is it responsive?
As responsive as the main site. I just updated the dlang.org submodule
and fixed what got broken.
I'm mostly done now. Pull request is over here:
https://github.com/CyberShadow/DFeed/pull/51
On 01/12/2016 03:12 PM, anonymous wrote:
On 12.01.2016 08:24, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Nice. Is it responsive?
As responsive as the main site. I just updated the dlang.org submodule
and fixed what got broken.
I'm mostly done now. Pull request is over here:
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 01:02:44 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I could use some help on the html processing though.
Wasn't there a binding for an html parser or does someone know
a suitable tool?
My dom.d in loose mode is able to read ddoc's output. Here's a
skeleton program you can use to
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 23:23:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Yeah, great tool Martin. I recall it was among the first on the
dub repo. Would be great to hook it in and have it insert a
bunch of ""s. -- Andrei
It's from 2014-Dec-11 and despite a few deprecations it still
builds and
On 2016-01-11 00:31, anonymous wrote:
I think it was Adam who spoke out against :hover menus, preferring to
click instead. So we're at 1:1 now, I guess?
Do both?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 19:39:51 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 11.01.2016 15:58, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Ah, sorry, the build instructions are out of date. That file
is created
through the makefile (GNUmakefile).
Alright, after `make` it works.
I've started hacking around, no road blocks
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 23:31:07 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 22:14, deadalnix wrote:
- Learn barely make the cut on my 15' monitor. That's way
too low. If
one doesn't know D, one doesn't care about news, community or
whatever.
We can shuffle things around, of course. One
On 11.01.2016 13:54, deadalnix wrote:
No, nothing more needs to be added. Things needs to be removed, not
added. I tested on a 15" screen, not even on a small screen.
As far as I understand, you're saying that Learn is too far down. I'm
saying we can fix that by moving it up to the first row.
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 12:54:46 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 23:31:07 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 22:14, deadalnix wrote:
- Learn barely make the cut on my 15' monitor. That's way
too low. If
one doesn't know D, one doesn't care about news, community or
On 09.01.2016 23:24, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Once this is merged, would you be OK with working together on updating
the forum to the new design?
I wanted to have a look at DFeed, but all I get with a local clone is
"Internal Server Error". After investigating a bit, I suspect that there
On 10.01.2016 16:23, anonymous wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187
That one was pulled prematurely, and then reverted.
Round 2: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1190
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 13:18:26 UTC, wobbles wrote:
What was Adams gripe with :hover? I can't see a problem with
it, as long as clicking still works as it does now (for mobile).
I click on my URL bar and punch in "interesting-site.com". It
loads and I move my mouse down to a link or
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 14:27:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 13:18:26 UTC, wobbles wrote:
What was Adams gripe with :hover? I can't see a problem with
it, as long as clicking still works as it does now (for
mobile).
I click on my URL bar and punch in
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 14:54:12 UTC, wobbles wrote:
How else would you lay it out?
I dont think you could put all the content in that top bar
pre-expanded - so you'd have all the menus on the left as it is
on the current site?
I think the left menu on the current site is of limited
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 11:48:18 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 09.01.2016 23:24, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Once this is merged, would you be OK with working together on
updating
the forum to the new design?
I wanted to have a look at DFeed, but all I get with a local
clone is "Internal
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 15:06:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 14:54:12 UTC, wobbles wrote:
How else would you lay it out?
I dont think you could put all the content in that top bar
pre-expanded - so you'd have all the menus on the left as it
is on the current
On 11.01.2016 15:58, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Ah, sorry, the build instructions are out of date. That file is created
through the makefile (GNUmakefile).
Alright, after `make` it works.
I've started hacking around, no road blocks so far. Looks like this at
the moment:
On 2016-01-10 21:23, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
You're right, sorry about getting too enthusiastic. Should we undo? --
Andrei
That depends on how many new issues have appeared, how much trouble they
cause and how much trouble it is do a rollback. It might be easier to
roll forward.
--
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 22:11:51 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 19:04, Saurabh Das wrote:
What is the canonical way to report bugs on the website?
Website bugs go into the same bug tracker as compiler and
library bugs:
https://issues.dlang.org/
Select "dlang.org" for component.
On 1/10/2016 3:09 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 10 January 2016 at 23:33, anonymous via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
On 10.01.2016 22:18, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I echo this, and would add a
On 09.01.2016 23:36, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
[...]
4) Fonts
[...]
One nitpick here: can you change the function signatures to use a
monospace font (any will do really)?
Done.
Also, can you institute this change
to the function
On 09.01.2016 11:35, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm not sure that I like that some of the headers (learn, packages) are
clickable on the main page. This also causes some icons to be black
(gray?) and some to be red. How about a link at the end of the section
with the title "Read more", or similar?
On 09.01.2016 22:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/8/16 5:32 PM, anonymous wrote:
[...]
5) Justified Text
[...]
Justified font only looks good in conjunction with hyphenation. I'd say
make text justified on browsers that support css hyphenation (all but
Chrome I recall?) and left align on
On 09.01.2016 23:24, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
[...]
Once this is merged, would you be OK with working together on updating
the forum to the new design?
Sure.
3) New Pages
[...]
Perhaps also link to (or even replace with) the
On 1/10/16 9:05 AM, anonymous wrote:
On 09.01.2016 22:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/8/16 5:32 PM, anonymous wrote:
[...]
5) Justified Text
[...]
Justified font only looks good in conjunction with hyphenation. I'd say
make text justified on browsers that support css hyphenation (all
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 17:17:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/10/16 10:23 AM, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Do you have a PR in place yet?
Here we go:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187
...aand we're live.
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
My implementation of the redesign is pretty much complete.
Check it out: http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
This is an implementation of a design done by one Ivan Smirnov,
brought forward by Jacob Carlborg [1].
The dark forum widgets
On 10.01.2016 15:27, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
Can I ask not to use dotted frames?
I agree that they're ugly, but they've been ugly before the redesign,
too. Let's do such stuff in separate pull requests.
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
My implementation of the redesign is pretty much complete.
Check it out: http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
Congratulations on getting this merged!
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 14:04:44 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Example:
http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/phobos-prerelease/std_algorithm_searching.html#.commonPrefix
Can I ask not to use dotted frames? It may be my eyes, but I get
dizzy reading the tables.
Maybe format tables like the cheat sheet
On 08.01.2016 23:32, anonymous wrote:
My implementation of the redesign is pretty much complete.
Check it out: http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
No blocking issues in sight so far. Time to make a pull request:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187
On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Do you have a PR in place yet?
Here we go:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187
congratulations
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 17:17:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/10/16 10:23 AM, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Do you have a PR in place yet?
Here we go:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187
...aand we're live.
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 17:02:59 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
[...]
The grayed out header colour looks funny.
I meant it looks funny when it spans half the height of the page
when the example code is long. It looks fine otherwise :)
On 1/10/16 10:23 AM, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Do you have a PR in place yet?
Here we go:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187
...aand we're live. Congratulations and many thanks to the folks who
worked on this! -- Andrei
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 17:17:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/10/16 10:23 AM, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Do you have a PR in place yet?
Here we go:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187
...aand we're live.
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:18:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I echo this, and would add a further point that you should have
tested all sub-domains before uploading. Release archive is
not looking well.
http://downloads.dlang.org/
Wow. Man I don't want to be too harsh, but that was
On 10.01.2016 21:50, mate wrote:
I have one issue with icons display on my laptop, although they display
well on my phone:
http://imgur.com/lZWgWI4
http://imgur.com/KZWBiVr
Usually this kind of issues is due to my use of script blocker, but
disabling it and reloading the page does not seem to
On 01/10/2016 03:05 PM, anonymous wrote:
> On 09.01.2016 22:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 1/8/16 5:32 PM, anonymous wrote:
> [...]
>>> 5) Justified Text
> [...]
>> Justified font only looks good in conjunction with hyphenation. I'd say
>> make text justified on browsers that support css
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 19:50:40 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 17:17:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/10/16 10:23 AM, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Do you have a PR in place yet?
Here we go:
On 1/10/16 1:05 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
@Andrei, I am once again disappointed and frustrated at your attitude
towards your fellow dlang.org maintainers. Please allow proper time for
code review for pull requests, but at this point I feel like talking to
a wall.
You're right, sorry about
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 17:17:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/10/16 10:23 AM, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Do you have a PR in place yet?
Here we go:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187
...aand we're live.
On 10 January 2016 at 22:14, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 17:17:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> On 1/10/16 10:23 AM, anonymous wrote:
>>
>>> On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
Do you have a PR in
Thanks and congrats!
I have one issue with icons display on my laptop, although they
display well on my phone:
http://imgur.com/lZWgWI4
http://imgur.com/KZWBiVr
Usually this kind of issues is due to my use of script blocker,
but disabling it and reloading the page does not seem to fix it.
On 10.01.2016 23:03, cym13 wrote:
Note that this url shouldn't even exist: the link on the main page for
the download section points to http://dlang.org/download.html . I
believe it is a left-over from a previous version.
downloads.dlang.org is linked from download.html ("Release Archive"). So
First of all, the site looks better than the old version.
Congratulations and now the criticism:
I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings. But look the DMD's Image
compared to GDC and LDC: http://i.imgur.com/TrnuxcB.jpg
Really looks like a joke. I would say this seems more like 90's
but I
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 22:46:34 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
First of all, the site looks better than the old version.
Congratulations and now the criticism:
I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings. But look the DMD's
Image compared to GDC and LDC: http://i.imgur.com/TrnuxcB.jpg
Really looks
On 1/10/16 4:44 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 01/10/2016 03:05 PM, anonymous wrote:
On 09.01.2016 22:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/8/16 5:32 PM, anonymous wrote:
[...]
5) Justified Text
[...]
Justified font only looks good in conjunction with hyphenation. I'd say
make text justified on
On 10.01.2016 22:14, deadalnix wrote:
- Learn barely make the cut on my 15' monitor. That's way too low. If
one doesn't know D, one doesn't care about news, community or whatever.
We can shuffle things around, of course. One alternative:
Learn News
Documentation Community
Packages
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 22:25:50 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:58:19 UTC, mate wrote:
The icons are done using FontAwesome. Do the icons work on
their examples page?
https://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/examples/#basic
Yes.
Also, what browser are you
On 10.01.2016 22:18, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I echo this, and would add a further point that you should have tested all
sub-domains before uploading. Release archive is not looking well.
http://downloads.dlang.org/
Uhm, where can I fix that? downloads.dlang.org isn't part of the
On 1/10/16 4:46 PM, JohnCK wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:18:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I echo this, and would add a further point that you should have tested
all sub-domains before uploading. Release archive is not looking well.
http://downloads.dlang.org/
Wow. Man I don't want to
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 15:23:53 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Do you have a PR in place yet?
Here we go:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187
This looks gorgeous. Congratulation to our @anonymous contributor!
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:46:03 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:18:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I echo this, and would add a further point that you should
have tested all sub-domains before uploading. Release archive
is not looking well.
http://downloads.dlang.org/
On 10.01.2016 19:04, Saurabh Das wrote:
What is the canonical way to report bugs on the website?
Website bugs go into the same bug tracker as compiler and library bugs:
https://issues.dlang.org/
Select "dlang.org" for component.
On mobile, the red "your code here" merges with the code
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:58:19 UTC, mate wrote:
The icons are done using FontAwesome. Do the icons work on
their examples page?
https://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/examples/#basic
Yes.
Also, what browser are you using, and what operating system?
Firefox 43.0.3, on linux
On 10 January 2016 at 23:46, JohnCK via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> First of all, the site looks better than the old version. Congratulations
> and now the criticism:
>
> I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings. But look the DMD's Image compared
> to GDC and LDC:
On 10.01.2016 18:02, Saurabh Das wrote:
On the font used, Roboto Slab: I feel that the serif nature of the font
makes it clash with the clean design. A sans serif font would look much
better.
At first I felt so, too, but the font grew on me. I think it works well.
"Your Code Here" widget
The icons are done using FontAwesome. Do the icons work on
their examples page?
https://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/examples/#basic
Yes.
Also, what browser are you using, and what operating system?
Firefox 43.0.3, on linux (Fedora).
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 22:46:34 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
First of all, the site looks better than the old version.
Congratulations and now the criticism:
I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings. But look the DMD's
Image compared to GDC and LDC: http://i.imgur.com/TrnuxcB.jpg
Really looks
On 10 January 2016 at 23:33, anonymous via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 10.01.2016 22:18, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
>> I echo this, and would add a further point that you should have tested all
>> sub-domains before uploading. Release archive is not
On 2016-01-08 23:32, anonymous wrote:
My implementation of the redesign is pretty much complete.
Check it out: http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
I'm not sure that I like that some of the headers (learn, packages) are
clickable on the main page. This also causes some icons to be black
(gray?)
On 1/8/16 5:32 PM, anonymous wrote:
My implementation of the redesign is pretty much complete.
Check it out: http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
This is an implementation of a design done by one Ivan Smirnov, brought
forward by Jacob Carlborg [1].
The dark forum widgets on the home page are in
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
My implementation of the redesign is pretty much complete.
Check it out: http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
This is an implementation of a design done by one Ivan Smirnov,
brought forward by Jacob Carlborg [1].
Very nice work. Thank
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
My implementation of the redesign is pretty much complete.
Check it out: http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
Looks great!
3) New Pages
Aside from the overall style changes and menu reorganization, I
also added overview pages for the
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Another external dependency is the This Week in D script. Adam,
it would be nice if the `setTwid` function could take the date
separately. That would allow me to word the text without having
"This Week in D" there twice.
Once it
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
My implementation of the redesign is pretty much complete.
check it out: http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
Well I think it's very good, the layout is clean and very
presentable.
I know that isn't your fault, but that logo needs a
69 matches
Mail list logo