On 1/9/15 4:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/9/15 12:59 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-09 20:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Stuff's up! http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/stdc/complex.html.
I couldn't get rid of the darn space between the header name and the
period. --
On 1/11/15 11:26 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/9/15 4:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/9/15 12:59 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-09 20:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Stuff's up! http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/stdc/complex.html.
I couldn't get rid of the darn
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 19:52:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/11/15 11:26 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/9/15 4:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/9/15 12:59 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-09 20:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Stuff's up!
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 08:46:41 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
* I still have reservations about using Disqus.
I'm quite happy with the self hosted isso comments on my blog.
https://code.dawg.eu/reducing-vibed-turnaround-time-part-2-less-compiling.html#isso-thread
On 1/8/15 4:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/8/15 10:41 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/8/15 4:18 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Thoughts? I can put together a pull for core.stdc.* if it makes sense.
Blurb LGTM, please make it happen. Also let's experiment with the ///'s.
On 1/9/15 12:08 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 12:18:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
One thing that may be misleading about this -- our headers don't
include *everything* from C-land.
What's missing? They should just match their C counterparts.
Andrei had the
On 1/9/15 12:08 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 12:18:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
One thing that may be misleading about this -- our headers don't
include *everything* from C-land.
What's missing? They should just match their C counterparts.
Perhaps they do, I
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 12:18:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
One thing that may be misleading about this -- our headers
don't include *everything* from C-land.
What's missing? They should just match their C counterparts.
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 11:46:47AM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
Stuff's up!
http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/stdc/complex.html. I couldn't
get rid of the darn space between the header name and the period.
[...]
Isn't this caused by the fact that the
On 01/09/2015 07:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Maybe Calypso could be used for that? -- Andrei
What's calypso, can't find anything.
On 1/9/15 10:10 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/9/15 12:08 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 12:18:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
One thing that may be misleading about this -- our headers don't
include *everything* from C-land.
What's missing? They should just
On 1/9/15 10:46 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/9/15 12:08 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 12:18:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
One thing that may be misleading about this -- our headers don't
include *everything* from C-land.
What's missing? They should just
On Friday, 9 January 2015 at 20:00:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 11:46:47AM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Stuff's up!
http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/stdc/complex.html. I
couldn't
get rid of the darn space between the
On 01/09/2015 09:29 PM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
In this case there is a span class=pln /span that is 16px wide and
occupies exactly the space you want to get rid of. It only shows up when
viewing the HTML using the Chrome developer tools (F12). It's not in the
page source.
It's highlighted as D
On 1/9/15 12:35 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 01/09/2015 09:29 PM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
In this case there is a span class=pln /span that is 16px wide and
occupies exactly the space you want to get rid of. It only shows up when
viewing the HTML using the Chrome developer tools (F12). It's not in
On 2015-01-09 20:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Stuff's up! http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/stdc/complex.html.
I couldn't get rid of the darn space between the header name and the
period. -- Andrei
Is it just me or are the actual declarations missing?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 1/9/15 11:58 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 11:46:47AM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
Stuff's up!
http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/stdc/complex.html. I couldn't
get rid of the darn space between the header name and the
On 1/9/15 12:59 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-09 20:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Stuff's up! http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/stdc/complex.html.
I couldn't get rid of the darn space between the header name and the
period. -- Andrei
Is it just me or are the actual
On 1/9/15 1:18 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/9/15 1:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/9/15 12:59 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-09 20:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Stuff's up! http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/stdc/complex.html.
I couldn't get rid of the darn space
On 1/9/15 1:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/9/15 12:59 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-09 20:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Stuff's up! http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/stdc/complex.html.
I couldn't get rid of the darn space between the header name and the
period. --
On 1/9/15 2:14 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-08 22:01, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
core.stdc.config is not technically a standard C header, and it seems
pretty strange. I'm going to leave that one alone unless someone objects.
Shouldn't this then be documented like any other
On 2015-01-08 22:01, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
core.stdc.config is not technically a standard C header, and it seems
pretty strange. I'm going to leave that one alone unless someone objects.
Shouldn't this then be documented like any other druntime/Phobos module.
There are many cases
On 1/8/2015 1:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
core.stdc.config is not technically a standard C header, and it seems pretty
strange. I'm going to leave that one alone unless someone objects.
Yeah, the mere existence of that module grates.
On 2015-01-08 22:23, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 21:14:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't think there is a way.
version(Ddoc) dummy prototypes maybe. But that gets painful.
Tango is using this method quite heavily in some modules. It also gives
the
On 2015-01-08 22:25, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yah, as I said it's a project.
Can we at least generate the documentation on multiple platforms, just
to make sure we got all modules.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 1/8/2015 7:41 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
If we get real cocky we might insert for each symbol a LUCKY link googling for
the
header name and symbol name.
Livin' on the edge!
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:14:43PM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 1/8/15 1:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
There are many cases where the members are dependent on the OS. The
one that strikes me as the most OS dependent (so far) is errno.d. I'm
guessing that only
On 1/7/15 1:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/6/15 6:17 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/6/15 5:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
std.algorithm has many of the descriptions
On 1/6/15 8:16 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/6/15 3:44 PM, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from
here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Is it intentional for
On 2015-01-08 13:18, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I like this idea.
One thing that may be misleading about this -- our headers don't include
*everything* from C-land.
What would be a good generic blurb? strawman:
core.stdc.ctype:
This contains bindings to selected types and functions from the
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 12:18:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/6/15 8:16 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/6/15 3:44 PM, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries
linked from
On 1/7/15 10:55 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 15:42:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* I still have reservations about using Disqus.
I did keep that in mind. The long and short of it it it's impossible
to make a change that everybody likes. We must move
On 1/8/15 4:18 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/6/15 8:16 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/6/15 3:44 PM, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from
here:
On 1/8/15 4:31 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think anyone who has commit rights to any D project should be made
moderator so they can stomp out trolls, remove fleeting/simple questions
(after nudging towards d.learn), etc.
Sönke could do this I think. -- Andrei
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 21:14:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I don't think there is a way.
version(Ddoc) dummy prototypes maybe. But that gets painful.
Though I think the compiler should NOT do conditional compilation
when generating documentation. Instead, I'd prefer to just put
On 1/8/15 10:41 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/8/15 4:18 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Thoughts? I can put together a pull for core.stdc.* if it makes sense.
Blurb LGTM, please make it happen. Also let's experiment with the ///'s.
Just to put a semaphore on this, I'm partway
On 1/8/15 1:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
There are many cases where the members are dependent on the OS. The one
that strikes me as the most OS dependent (so far) is errno.d. I'm
guessing that only one of those docs is going to go into the online
docs? Is there a standard way to make them
On 1/8/15 1:23 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 21:14:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't think there is a way.
version(Ddoc) dummy prototypes maybe. But that gets painful.
In doc builds we can probably define Windows on Linux etc.
Though I think the compiler
On 1/7/2015 12:41 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 07:12:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I find dman.exe to be very handy and use it all the time, but since it is a
hand-built index, it is always hopelessly out of date.
Why not reuse the index built by chmgen? It's
On 2015-01-07 00:44, weaselcat wrote:
Is it intentional for all of the stdc pages to be empty?
Why is even std.c.* still available. These should all be replaced with
core.stdc.*.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-01-06 23:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
What about all those suggestions in the thread Improving ddoc [1]?
Some of those suggestions might require to redesign the
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 08:46:41 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
* Overzealous linking of words in the documentation that happen
to coincide with symbols in the same module. This should only
be done for text in $(D ...) tags.
According to the specs:
Identifiers in documentation
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 01:13:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/6/15 4:26 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
std.string looks fine only the indexOfNeither and
lastIndexOfNeither are
missing
Could you please fix -- thanks! -- Andrei
I think I just did. Does the webpage show
On 1/7/15 12:22 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from
here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Has it been generated from an up-to-date version? Where are
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked
from here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Has it been generated from an up-to-date version? Where are the
sub modules of std.container?
On 1/7/15 12:24 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/7/15 12:22 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from
here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Has it been
On 1/6/15 2:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Many thanks to those who provided feedback on the new layout!
I've fixed a few issues, but it looks like there are quite a few more
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 07:12:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/6/2015 10:48 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Another one; I tried to use the search box on the top right
corner...
it just resulted in a google search.
Can we do better than that? When people go to the
documentation page,
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked
from here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
From my last complain thread:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/zazgfoxjwhjbdrgdi...@forum.dlang.org
I see that many
Apparently the links exist, but don't work, e.g.
http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/std/std_container_array is
not to be found. -- Andrei
It works from the tree on the left.
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked
from here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
I think there needs to a clear separation between the end of the
overview (e.g. the cheat sheet in
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 06:48:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
That would be quite an involved project. -- Andrei
http://dpldocs.info/
On 2015-01-07 23:35, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The way I see this, these items are good to have and by nature of our
process will be deployed (if at all) incrementally by whomever is
interested in implementing them. We can't afford to block progress of
docs layout on this possibility. --
On 1/7/15 12:46 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Remaining issues:
* Overzealous linking of words in the documentation that happen to
coincide with symbols in the same module. This should only be done for
text in $(D ...) tags.
Yah, I'm quite unhappy about that, too.
* Compile-time expressions
On 1/7/15 11:12 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Most of the ideas I had might require some redesign of the documentation
layout, these are:
* Summary of symbols
* Documentation for private symbols
* Simplified signatures
* Links to all base classes and interfaces of a class
* Links to all symbols
On 1/7/15 1:06 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-07 00:44, weaselcat wrote:
Is it intentional for all of the stdc pages to be empty?
Why is even std.c.* still available. These should all be replaced with
core.stdc.*.
Please fix or file so this isn't forgotten. -- Andrei
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked
from here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
I don't think I have to point out the problems with
http://dlang.org/library/std/algorithm/find.html
On 1/7/15 1:14 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-06 23:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
What about all those suggestions in the thread Improving ddoc [1]?
Some of those suggestions
On 1/7/15 7:55 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 15:42:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Could you please fix or file these. Thanks!
The D or DDox issue tracker?
Either, appropriately :o). -- Andrei
On 1/7/15 8:20 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from
here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
I don't think I have to point out the problems with
On 2015-01-07 16:42, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please fix or file so this isn't forgotten. -- Andrei
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Perhaps it should automatically ignore deprecated modules?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-01-07 17:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My summary of that discussion follows. There were quite a few radical
suggestions, some of which were interesting but that seemed to entail a
lot of work compared to the reaped benefits. (I have to say it was quite
fun to re-read the whole thread
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 15:42:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Could you please fix or file these. Thanks!
The D or DDox issue tracker?
* I still have reservations about using Disqus.
I did keep that in mind. The long and short of it it it's
impossible to make a change that
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked
from here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Is it intentional for all of the stdc pages to be empty?
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 00:06:28 UTC, Danny wrote:
http://dlang.org/library/core/math/ldexp.html
Compute n * 2⊃
Huh?
Weird.
It's `Compute n * 2$(SUP exp)` in the source[1]. SUP is a locally
defined macro. Maybe ddox doesn't like local macros?
1.
http://dlang.org/library/core/math/ldexp.html
Compute n * 2⊃
Huh?
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 23:44:30 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Is it intentional for all of the stdc pages to be empty?
I think it's intentional that they don't duplicate the
documentation for those headers, but we probably should add links
to pages that document the C headers.
std.string looks fine only the indexOfNeither and
lastIndexOfNeither are missing
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
On 1/6/2015 2:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
The table:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_math.html#.cos
got lost:
http://dlang.org/library/std/math/cos.html
Also, the 2$(SUP 64).
On 1/6/15 4:42 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 00:06:28 UTC, Danny wrote:
http://dlang.org/library/core/math/ldexp.html
Compute n * 2⊃
Huh?
Weird.
It's `Compute n * 2$(SUP exp)` in the source[1]. SUP is a locally
defined macro. Maybe ddox doesn't like local macros?
On 1/6/15 4:26 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
std.string looks fine only the indexOfNeither and lastIndexOfNeither are
missing
Could you please fix -- thanks! -- Andrei
On 1/6/15 5:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
std.algorithm has many of the descriptions showing samples. Also, I
know the table at the top is to make things easier for standard ddoc,
On 1/6/2015 2:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
In:
http://dlang.org/library/std/algorithm/make_index.html
if you click on the 'forward' link, it takes you to something quite
On 01/06/2015 05:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
On that page itself, the descriptions for at least std.regex and std.uni
include the headers (e.g Intro, Overview) from
On 1/6/2015 2:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Looks nice! And will provide motivation to fix a lot of the under-documented
functions.
On 7 January 2015 at 08:43, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Very first function I looked at:
On 7 January 2015 at 08:43, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Another thought, since per-page docs result in a lot more page loads,
this
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 07:06:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/6/15 11:02 PM, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 06:48:23 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/6/15 10:09 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7 January 2015 at 08:43, Andrei Alexandrescu via
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:43:45 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
so looking at the function documentation i lost that nice indexes. if i
got
On 1/6/15 7:27 PM, Paul O'Neil wrote:
On 01/06/2015 05:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
On that page itself, the descriptions for at least std.regex and std.uni
include the
On 1/6/15 7:20 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/6/2015 2:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
The table:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_math.html#.cos
got lost:
On 7 January 2015 at 08:43, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Another one; I tried to use the search box on the top right corner...
it
On 7/01/2015 7:20 p.m., Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7 January 2015 at 08:43, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Another thought,
On 1/6/15 7:27 PM, Paul O'Neil wrote:
On 01/06/2015 05:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
On that page itself, the descriptions for at least std.regex and std.uni
include the
On 1/6/15 8:54 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7 January 2015 at 08:43, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Very first function I
On 1/6/15 10:09 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7 January 2015 at 08:43, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Another one; I tried to
On 1/6/15 11:02 PM, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 06:48:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/6/15 10:09 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7 January 2015 at 08:43, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review.
On 1/6/2015 10:48 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Another one; I tried to use the search box on the top right corner...
it just resulted in a google search.
Can we do better than that? When people go to the documentation page,
they want to search the docs, not get a standard google results page.
On 1/6/15 6:17 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/6/15 5:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
std.algorithm has many of the descriptions showing samples. Also, I
know the table at the
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 07:44:39AM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:43:45 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from
here:
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 06:48:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/6/15 10:09 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7 January 2015 at 08:43, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked
from
On 1/6/15 3:44 PM, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from
here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
Is it intentional for all of the stdc pages to be empty?
It's a
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 22:32:05 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 07:44:39AM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:43:45 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
94 matches
Mail list logo
