On 2017-07-14 11:55, Marek wrote:
So why Ruby or Python frameworks are much faster in this benchmark?
They scale better since, at least Ruby on Rails applications, are run
using multiple processes.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 07:27:24 UTC, Marek wrote:
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=plaintext
C++, Java and Go frameworks have very high performance. Vibe.d
is supposed to have similar performance, but in fact vibe.d
performance is very low. Why?
these tests
Am 14.07.2017 um 11:55 schrieb Marek:
On Friday, 7 July 2017 at 19:03:52 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think that vibe.d didn't take full advantage of multi core, even
when enabling threading support. Ruby, or rather Rails, applications
are usually run using multiple processes, which allows to
On Friday, 7 July 2017 at 19:03:52 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think that vibe.d didn't take full advantage of multi core,
even when enabling threading support. Ruby, or rather Rails,
applications are usually run using multiple processes, which
allows to scale on a multi core CPU. You can do
these tests are pretty flawed considering that top places are
taken by event loop libraries that have no other features other
than 'respond to request'
Am 07.07.2017 um 21:27 schrieb FoxyBrown:
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 10:57:31 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 06.07.2017 um 09:27 schrieb Marek:
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=plaintext
C++, Java and Go frameworks have very high performance. Vibe.d is
supposed to
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 10:57:31 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 06.07.2017 um 09:27 schrieb Marek:
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=plaintext
C++, Java and Go frameworks have very high performance. Vibe.d
is supposed to have similar performance, but in fact vibe.d
On 2017-07-07 20:22, Marek wrote:
What do you mean by 'scalability'? Raw tornado or bottle frameworks have
much better results than vibe.d. Python and Ruby have GIL so they can't
use threads in their standard implementations. They have much better
results anyway.
I think that vibe.d didn't
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 10:57:31 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
This is a scalability issue, which should hopefully be fixed
with 0.8.0. I'll open a PR once that is out. Basically with the
version that was used in the last benchmark round, it didn't
scale at all, and they use a server with many
Am 06.07.2017 um 09:27 schrieb Marek:
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=plaintext
C++, Java and Go frameworks have very high performance. Vibe.d is
supposed to have similar performance, but in fact vibe.d performance is
very low. Why?
This is a scalability issue,
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=plaintext
C++, Java and Go frameworks have very high performance. Vibe.d is
supposed to have similar performance, but in fact vibe.d
performance is very low. Why?
11 matches
Mail list logo