Re: What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

2016-07-19 Thread tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 13:01:23 UTC, maik klein wrote: I don't want to implement any memory safety at all, If you don't care about memory safety, I expect that your efforts to modify Phobos for that purpose will be unwelcome. The D leadership are actively working on non-GC memory

Re: What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

2016-07-19 Thread maik klein via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 06:05:27 UTC, qznc wrote: If I were your advisor, I would suggest not to think about Phobos. Just build your own library and publish via dub. Getting a contribution into Phobos is not a good use of time for a bachelor thesis. Apart from that: Ownership semantics as

Re: What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

2016-07-19 Thread Karabuta via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 06:05:27 UTC, qznc wrote: On Saturday, 16 July 2016 at 21:45:17 UTC, maik klein wrote: I was actually thinking of contributing something bigger as part of my bachelor thesis. (Not sure if I am allowed to do that) What I wanted to do is to translate a big part of

Re: What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

2016-07-18 Thread tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 16 July 2016 at 21:45:17 UTC, maik klein wrote: What I wanted to do is to translate a big part of Rust's std to D. Stuff like Rc, Arc, Box, Optional + all the necessary tools for ownership semantics. Also implement data structures that work with ownership semantics (Rc, Box, Arc

Re: What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

2016-07-17 Thread qznc via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 16 July 2016 at 21:45:17 UTC, maik klein wrote: I was actually thinking of contributing something bigger as part of my bachelor thesis. (Not sure if I am allowed to do that) What I wanted to do is to translate a big part of Rust's std to D. Stuff like Rc, Arc, Box, Optional +

Re: What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

2016-07-16 Thread Enamex via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 16 July 2016 at 21:45:17 UTC, maik klein wrote: I was actually thinking of contributing something bigger as part of my bachelor thesis. (Not sure if I am allowed to do that) What I wanted to do is to translate a big part of Rust's std to D. Stuff like Rc, Arc, Box, Optional +

Re: What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

2016-07-16 Thread maik klein via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 16 July 2016 at 20:38:05 UTC, The D dude wrote: On Friday, 15 July 2016 at 12:59:39 UTC, maik klein wrote: https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H2 Safety and Memory Management Safety and making the GC optional remain important concerns through the end of this year. We are putting

Re: What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

2016-07-16 Thread The D dude via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 15 July 2016 at 12:59:39 UTC, maik klein wrote: https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H2 Safety and Memory Management Safety and making the GC optional remain important concerns through the end of this year. We are putting them together because the GC alternatives we endorse must

What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

2016-07-15 Thread maik klein via Digitalmars-d
https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H2 Safety and Memory Management Safety and making the GC optional remain important concerns through the end of this year. We are putting them together because the GC alternatives we endorse must address safety. Has there been any progress so far? Are there