On 5/23/2018 3:20 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 20:17:04 UTC, Dlang User wrote:
I tried adding bootstrap option for 64 bit:
digger -c build.components.dmd.dmdModel=64 -c
build.components.dmd.bootstrap.ver=v2.075.0 build --model=64 v2.080.0
Which didn't work (tota
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 20:17:04 UTC, Dlang User wrote:
I tried adding bootstrap option for 64 bit:
digger -c build.components.dmd.dmdModel=64 -c
build.components.dmd.bootstrap.ver=v2.075.0 build --model=64
v2.080.0
Which didn't work (totally different error):
Looks like more DMD bugs
On 5/23/2018 12:42 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 17:35:28 UTC, Dlang User wrote:
I too am looking for 64-bit on Windows 10. Not just DMD but ideally
everything.
When I try the command exactly as above, or a slightly modified
version (on a second run show after th
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 17:35:28 UTC, Dlang User wrote:
I too am looking for 64-bit on Windows 10. Not just DMD but
ideally everything.
When I try the command exactly as above, or a slightly modified
version (on a second run show after this run), I hit an error
on my machine:
Internal
On 5/22/2018 10:03 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 13:30:02 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 13:11:00 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 03:28:33 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
digger build --model=64
If you don't have Digger yet, yo
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 13:30:02 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 13:11:00 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 03:28:33 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
digger build --model=64
If you don't have Digger yet, you can run it straight from
Dub:
dub fetc
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 13:11:00 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 03:28:33 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
digger build --model=64
If you don't have Digger yet, you can run it straight from Dub:
dub fetch digger
dub run digger -- build --model=64
I keep forgetting about
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 03:28:33 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I just spent 45min trying to build 64-bit dmd on Windows. It
wasn't fun. "Isn't it just make -f win64.mak?", I hear you
ask. Yes. If you want a version with debug mess
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I just spent 45min trying to build 64-bit dmd on Windows. It
wasn't fun. "Isn't it just make -f win64.mak?", I hear you ask.
Yes. If you want a version with debug messages turned on. It
took me 45min to learn that disabling those is...
On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 11:21:21 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 19:41:25 UTC, Rubn wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
Which DMD version are you using to compile with? There was an
issue in DMD a while back that prevented the 64-b
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 19:41:25 UTC, Rubn wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
Which DMD version are you using to compile with? There was an
issue in DMD a while back that prevented the 64-bit version
from being compiled.
Yah I have no idea how makin
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 22:07 +, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 17:40:46 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> > > [...]
> >
> > Wait, dmd doesn't use cmake to generate the makefile!? IMO this
> > is the reas
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 17:40 +, 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
[…]
> Wait, dmd doesn't use cmake to generate the makefile!? IMO this
> is the reason why configuration tools like cmake exist.
Last time I mentioned updating any build systems in the D-verse, some people
mentioned "try it
On 5/15/2018 3:13 PM, Atila Neves wrote:
I'm sure there's a good reason why there's no pre-built 64-bit dmd for Windows,
I just don't know what it is.
Part of it is there was no Win64 bit code generation capability for quite a
while.
Then there was the issue of VC not supporting 80 bit reals.
On 5/15/2018 3:15 PM, Atila Neves wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18864
:-)
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 19:43:25 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/15/2018 9:01 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
I just spent 45min trying to build 64-bit dmd on Windows. It
wasn't fun.
Please file this post on bugzilla.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18864
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 19:54:03 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Isn't it just make -f win64.mak?", I hear you ask.
I wouldn't ask that. Every time I need a 64-bit dmd, I open the
project in src/vcbuild and let Visual Studio and Visual D
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 19:41:25 UTC, Rubn wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
Which DMD version are you using to compile with?
dmd 2.080.0 installed today.
Yah I have no idea how making the installer works
I know how it works, I just don't know ho
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 18:20:29 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't know why even bother with 32-bit dmd to begin with,
but at least there should be an option.
[...]
You need to do make clean.
As the backend build with debug symbols
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 17:40:46 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
Wait, dmd doesn't use cmake to generate the makefile!? IMO this
is the reason why configuration tools like cmake exist.
CMake? Hah, no. They're hand crafted Makefile
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't know why even bother with 32-bit dmd to begin with, but
at least there should be an option.
I just spent 45min trying to build 64-bit dmd on Windows. It
wasn't fun. "Isn't it just make -f win64.mak?", I hear you ask.
Yes. If
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Isn't it just make -f win64.mak?", I hear you ask.
I wouldn't ask that. Every time I need a 64-bit dmd, I open the
project in src/vcbuild and let Visual Studio and Visual D take
care of it.
But I agree with the subject entirely. 64
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't know why even bother with 32-bit dmd to begin with, but
at least there should be an option.
I just spent 45min trying to build 64-bit dmd on Windows. It
wasn't fun. "Isn't it just make -f win64.mak?", I hear you ask.
Yes. If
On 5/15/2018 9:01 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
I just spent 45min trying to build 64-bit dmd on Windows. It wasn't fun.
Please file this post on bugzilla.
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't know why even bother with 32-bit dmd to begin with, but
at least there should be an option.
[...]
You need to do make clean.
As the backend build with debug symbols will be ABI incompatible
to the release frontend.
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't know why even bother with 32-bit dmd to begin with, but
at least there should be an option.
[...]
Far as I know VS project shoukd build x64 version just fine with
MS C++ compiler. Used to be that way a couple years ago.
A
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't know why even bother with 32-bit dmd to begin with, but
at least there should be an option.
I just spent 45min trying to build 64-bit dmd on Windows. It
wasn't fun. "Isn't it just make -f win64.mak?", I hear you ask.
Yes. If
I don't know why even bother with 32-bit dmd to begin with, but
at least there should be an option.
I just spent 45min trying to build 64-bit dmd on Windows. It
wasn't fun. "Isn't it just make -f win64.mak?", I hear you ask.
Yes. If you want a version with debug messages turned on. It took
me
28 matches
Mail list logo
