On 2015-06-05 14:53, Basile Burg wrote:
No, you don't get my point with setters: if a during the deserialization
you restore, let's say, the _width field and that 12 children controls
rely on this field then they won't be aware of the change.
But if the deserializer restores using the width(int
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 12:53:45 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 10:32:25 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
[...]
using property setters and getters doesn't seem like the best
idea
as they may either:
they are used to
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 13:05:55 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 12:53:45 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
[...]
No, you don't get my point with setters: if a during the
deserialization you restore, let's say, the
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 10:32:25 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:52:45 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos and
its only reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:41:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:22, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
I noticed there hasn't been any activity on the Github repo
for 8
months. Why is that? Do you consider this a completely
finished
product, or are you held up by the PHobos review
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 10:32:25 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
[...]
using property setters and getters doesn't seem like the best
idea
as they may either:
they are used to get live data e.g. setter calls hashing
function
for an
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 14:55:24 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Cerealed has more features than this as well. I'd struggle to
write code as short as I did when using it to implement
networking protocols. I also only encoded bytes as big-endian
since binary serialization is usually followed by
I hope you can get the third review process done because Phobos
needs serialization and it would be much better to use tried
and tested code like orange rather than something I've pulled
together over a couple of weeks
Does phobos really _need_ it? It'd be nice, sure, but given
there's more
Cerealed has more features than this as well. I'd struggle to
write code as short as I did when using it to implement
networking protocols. I also only encoded bytes as big-endian
since binary serialization is usually followed by sending
those bytes over the wire. Given you check the endianess
On 2015-06-02 22:02, Atila Neves wrote:
So does cerealed, in one of two ways, postBlit being the _much_ better one:
I forgot to mention that Orange also supports pre and post
actions/callbacks [1].
[1] https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/orange/blob/master/tests/Events.d
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:00:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-02 22:02, Atila Neves wrote:
So does cerealed, in one of two ways, postBlit being the
_much_ better one:
I forgot to mention that Orange also supports pre and post
actions/callbacks [1].
[1]
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:41:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:22, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
I noticed there hasn't been any activity on the Github repo
for 8
months. Why is that? Do you consider this a completely
finished
product, or are you held up by the PHobos review
On 2015-06-03 09:26, Atila Neves wrote:
From the unit tests, that doesn't seem to do the same thing, but I
could be wrong.
No, it does not. But it can still be useful. Like if you want to do any
post processing after deserialization.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 12:15:43 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-03 09:26, Atila Neves wrote:
From the unit tests, that doesn't seem to do the same thing,
but I
could be wrong.
No, it does not. But it can still be useful. Like if you want
to do any post processing after
On 2015-06-02 12:32, Basile Burg wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:52:45 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos and its
only reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 19:49:39 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:32, Basile Burg wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:52:45 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos
and its
only reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:52:45 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos and
its only reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
https://github.com/sycam0inc/phobos/blob/master/std/experimental/serialization.d
I would like some feedback on it
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 05:07:29 UTC, lobo wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:41:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:22, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
I noticed there hasn't been any activity on the Github repo
for 8
months. Why is that? Do you consider this a completely
finished
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos and
its only reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
https://github.com/sycam0inc/phobos/blob/master/std/experimental/serialization.d
I would like some feedback on it
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:52:45 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos and
its only reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
https://github.com/sycam0inc/phobos/blob/master/std/experimental/serialization.d
I would like some feedback on it
On 2015-06-01 14:52, Sean Campbell wrote:
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos and its only
reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
https://github.com/sycam0inc/phobos/blob/master/std/experimental/serialization.d
I would like some feedback on it
I had a quick
On 2015-06-01 21:22, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
I noticed there hasn't been any activity on the Github repo for 8
months. Why is that? Do you consider this a completely finished
product, or are you held up by the PHobos review process?
I just haven't worked on it for a while. Working on the ,
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 14:45:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-01 14:52, Sean Campbell wrote:
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos and
its only
reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 15:11:54 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:52:45 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos and
its only reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 15:11:54 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:52:45 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
I've been working on a new serialization module for Phobos and
its only reliant on 4 Phobos modules
it is available at
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:41:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:22, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
I noticed there hasn't been any activity on the Github repo
for 8
months. Why is that? Do you consider this a completely
finished
product, or are you held up by the PHobos review
26 matches
Mail list logo
