On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 09:00:37 UTC, realNoob wrote:
Error 1: Previous Definition Different :
_D4xaru8ezFilterFAAyaAyaZAAya
That is saying the function
module xaru;
string[] ezFilter(string[], string);
is defined twice. Could be something weird in your code, but I
would guess the
On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 11:34:22 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo
wrote:
On Monday, 13 February 2017 at 22:59:11 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Why not use a constructor instead of static opCall?
I don't know, this comes from
http://dlang.org/spec/struct.html#dynamic_struct_init. Your
constructor looks
On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 09:20:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I just got mine booked, and noticed the more convenient flights
were nearly full.
Hmm hope the ones going the other way around the globe don't get
filled up. I've still got to wait to see if I'm speaking before I
book mine.
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
301 posts (302 with this one). Time for a new thread?
please, no! i just downloaded 4500+ posts only to get the root of this
thread! don't turn it into useless effort!
On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 09:55:51 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2017-02-14 04:49, Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about allowing syntax sugar as an alternative to relying
on the new
`from/Module` inline import idiom:
```
void fun(T)(std.stdio::File input, T value) if
On Monday, 13 February 2017 at 17:44:10 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
To be clear: While I might, in general, agree that using shared
methods only for thread safe methods seems to be a sensible
restriction, neither language nor compiler require it to be so;
and absence of evidence of a useful
It's a quite frequent issue to get unresolved externals on Windows,
because the lib files of the Windows platform SDK are still stuck at
Windows XP age. It would make a lot of sense to update those to the
latest Windows 10 SDK, but I couldn't find a place where those are
present physically,
On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 10:52:37 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I remember some discussions about this some years ago and IIRC
the final decision was that the compiler will not magically
insert any barriers for shared variables.
It was so some years ago, not sure if it's still so. I
On 02/14/2017 04:55 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The signatures we already have in Phobos is quite ridiculous
How are they so, and what steps can we take to improve them. Could you
please give a few examples on how to do things better? Thx! -- Andrei
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 05:40:01 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, February 03, 2017 14:43:01 Dominikus Dittes Scherkl
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Any thoughts?
This is really cool, but I have a couple of concerns about this
and how it seems deficient in comparison to DIP 1005. I
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo