On Monday, 16 October 2017 at 05:09:04 UTC, Manu wrote:
Haha, incidentally, I've just moved to LA, and I'm failing to
convince myself I won't die if I try and drive here ;) .. I'm
still chickening out.
Someone once said, that the biggest problem with Fortran, is that
people actually use it.
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 16:13:06 UTC, Mark wrote:
I don't think this sort of complaints are particular to D. I
see similar rants in Scala's google group from time to time,
These 'predictable patterns' (the emergence of similar attitudes,
for example) can also be expressed and understood
On Friday, October 20, 2017 15:25:20 Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> So far I have seen three arguments proffered for the ban syntax sugar.
>
> The first is "Walter/Andrei doesn't have the time."
That actually has pretty much nothing to do with a feature request like
syntactic sugar - espec
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 22:25:20 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 10/20/17 04:04, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 02:49:34 Adam Wilson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Preach
Hello. I have an app for multiplayer game website. I am Facing an
issue about stacking terminal. Also the app does not save the
logs which is supposed to. I need someone who can fix this. Will
send the app to developer.
in total The tasks are :
1) Fix stacking issue in the terminal,
2) Fix sa
On 10/20/17 04:04, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 02:49:34 Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Here is the thing that bothers me about that stance. You are correct,
but I don't think you've considered the logical conclusion of the
direction your argument is headed. Pray tel
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 20:30:54 UTC, Seb wrote:
We are planing to hold a mini conference in Munich. The rough
plan for the weekend is as follows:
Great initiative. I wish I could join because I have loads of
ideas and code (phobos-next) to share. But I and my family are
currently a bit
Hi all,
We are planing to hold a mini conference in Munich. The rough
plan for the weekend is as follows:
Friday: social pre-conf / BeerConf
Saturday: talks
Sunday: hackathon / group discussions
As you all are amazing and we would love to see as many of you as
possible, we created a Doodle t
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 20:11:46 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 19:54:09 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 18:11:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
[...] The elvis operator, while trivial and
unnecessary, would be easy to implement correctly and give
a nice li
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 19:54:09 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 18:11:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
[...] The elvis operator, while trivial and
unnecessary, would be easy to implement correctly and give
a nice little PR boost to show that we care about the people
talking
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 19:18:15 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Interesting proposals, but IMHO, the only ESSENTIAL feature
missing in D is the possibility to program in D using a
built-in reference-counting based variant of the standard
library.
Look at the goals for H2 2017
https://wi
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 18:11:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
[...] The elvis operator, while trivial and
unnecessary, would be easy to implement correctly and give
a nice little PR boost to show that we care about the people
talking about it.
If you go by there, the safe navigation operator
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 23:02:27 UTC, Stephan Dilly
wrote:
On 2017-10-18 22:25:23 +, ikod said:
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 20:51:48 UTC, Stephan Dilly
wrote:
On 2017-10-18 20:19:20 +, ikod said:
Hello,
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 20:05:28 UTC, Andre Pany
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 08:56:21 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
Hi,
I had been using D for almost 6 years and I want to share my
opinion with you.
I don't want to blame anyone but I'll focus more on bad things
and possible improvements.
And this is just how I see D from my perspective.
(Sorry fo
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:20:52PM +, Random D user via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 02:20:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 00:26:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
> > > return foo ?? null; would be so much easier.
> > return getOr(foo, null);
>
> I gue
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 02:20:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 00:26:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
return foo ?? null; would be so much easier.
return getOr(foo, null);
I guess with UFCS you could get:
return foo.PP(null); // vs.
return foo ?? null;
:D
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 16:36:28 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
It might help to have some sense of how the main devs time on D
is being used.
Definitely, I currently have no clue what they are on.
Is elvis operator more important than improving
safe/scope/nogc/etc, I think most would say no.
I w
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 15:38:53 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Something I want to have for quite a while is a free-form poll
for features, maybe running 2 weeks or so, to get a better
understanding of community priorities.
Maybe once a quarter, ;)
It might help to have some sense of how
On Thursday, 19 October 2017 at 21:18:43 UTC, Rion wrote:
D has a bad track record with implementations of proposals,
even when the actual code has been written. There has always
been a standard: Walter writes it, its going to get accepted
with a high ratio in one form or another. Somebody who
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 08:56:21 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
First, D started as a great new language with the best from all
languages. But now D seems more and more conservative. New
syntactic sugars aren't added just because they can be found in
phobos. (this was Walter's answer when I asked
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 08:09:59 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
> return foo ?? null; would be so much easier.
Definitely the Elvis operator is a small and sometimes useful
addition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvis_operator
Your best bet on getting it, is writing a small DIP, the organize
con
On Thursday, 19 October 2017 at 06:50:12 UTC, Fra Mecca wrote:
We miss a build system that is tailored towards enterprises
Anything more specific on that?
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 11:28:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-10-20 09:58, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Did anyone tried to pack dmd as appimage? Is it even feasible?
It would be a easy way to:
- Run dmd without installation (and root permissions)
- Use multiple dmd versions
DVM [1] does
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 00:26:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 08:56:21 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
conditional dereferencing and stuff about that (same as in C#)
foo?.bar;
foo?[bar];
return foo ?? null;
Tbh. these are some I really wish were in D, because it becomes
tediou
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 09:40:26 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
If you need reason why is writing less code better just
calculate the time of it.
getOne(foo, null) // costs 3 sec.
foo ?? null // cost 1 sec.
Note that I do NOT object to these additions. I think they'd be
trivial, backward compati
On 2017-10-20 09:58, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Did anyone tried to pack dmd as appimage? Is it even feasible?
It would be a easy way to:
- Run dmd without installation (and root permissions)
- Use multiple dmd versions
DVM [1] doesn't require root permission, allows multiple dmd version and
it's
On Friday, October 20, 2017 02:49:34 Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Here is the thing that bothers me about that stance. You are correct,
> but I don't think you've considered the logical conclusion of the
> direction your argument is headed. Pray tell, why must we stop adding
> syntactic s
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 09:38:02 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 09:30:38 UTC, DlangLearner wrote:
We are in the last quarter of 2017, where is the vision
document for 2017H2?
It was published months ago and is linked from the front page:
https://dlang.org
If you mean
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 09:38:02 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 09:30:38 UTC, DlangLearner wrote:
We are in the last quarter of 2017, where is the vision
document for 2017H2?
It was published months ago and is linked from the front page:
https://dlang.org
If you mean
On 10/20/17 01:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 08:09:59 Satoshi via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 04:26:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 02:20:31 Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 00:26
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 08:32:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 08:09:59 Satoshi via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 04:26:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> On Friday, October 20, 2017 02:20:31 Adam D. Ruppe via
>
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On F
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 09:30:38 UTC, DlangLearner wrote:
We are in the last quarter of 2017, where is the vision
document for 2017H2?
It was published months ago and is linked from the front page:
https://dlang.org
If you mean 2018, this year isn't even over yet.
We are in the last quarter of 2017, where is the vision document
for 2017H2?
On Friday, October 20, 2017 08:09:59 Satoshi via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 04:26:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Friday, October 20, 2017 02:20:31 Adam D. Ruppe via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 00:26:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
> >>
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 04:26:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 02:20:31 Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 00:26:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
> return foo ? foo : null;
>
> where
>
> return foo ?? null; would be so much easier.
return g
Did anyone tried to pack dmd as appimage? Is it even feasible?
It would be a easy way to:
- Run dmd without installation (and root permissions)
- Use multiple dmd versions
36 matches
Mail list logo
