On 03/05/2018 02:42 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/04/2018 02:05 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/03/2018 10:22 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
You should get an email notification about failed builds [1] [2],
Weird. Never worked for me. Will have to check into that.
Ahh
On 03/04/2018 02:05 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/03/2018 10:22 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
You should get an email notification about failed builds [1] [2],
Weird. Never worked for me. Will have to check into that.
Ahh, it looks like travis disregards the github email address
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 12:05:08 UTC, rjframe wrote:
E.g., "dmd -check=in a.d" is unnecessary; it's equivalent to
"dmd a.d" "dmd -release -check=in a.d" turns off all checks
except in contracts.
I think, -check should specify hierarchic modes like in the DIP,
that would work independently
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 02:12:07 UTC, Adam Levine wrote:
Bonjour à tous
Alors voilà, quelqu'un saurait-il comment sont levé les
évènements des touches appuyées pour UDK?
Nous voudrions pouvoir utiliser un nouveau périphérique autre
que la souris, le clavier ... : En l’occurrence la Kinect
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 02:53:49 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 02:42:48 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
These guys have independent JVM implementation and used
Conservative GC for many years. As I can see it it is very
similar to d-runtime GC. But their conclusion is: "sooner or
la
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 02:42:48 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
These guys have independent JVM implementation and used
Conservative GC for many years. As I can see it it is very
similar to d-runtime GC. But their conclusion is: "sooner or
later the absence of knowledge about the liveness of local
var
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 02:42:48 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
These guys have independent JVM implementation and used
Conservative GC for many years. As I can see it it is very
similar to d-runtime GC. But their conclusion is: "sooner or
later the absence of knowledge about the liveness of local
var
These guys have independent JVM implementation and used
Conservative GC for many years. As I can see it it is very
similar to d-runtime GC. But their conclusion is: "sooner or
later the absence of knowledge about the liveness of local
variables will lead to problems in production that just cann
Bonjour à tous
Alors voilà, quelqu'un saurait-il comment sont levé les
évènements des touches appuyées pour UDK?
Nous voudrions pouvoir utiliser un nouveau périphérique autre que
la souris, le clavier ... : En l’occurrence la Kinect.
Nous avons développé notre API qui permet d'exploiter la ki
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 23:31:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 23:18:25 UTC, Norm wrote:
Can you run dub describe and parse the output, which is JSON I
think. It used to indicate a role for each source file under
each configuration, one of which is "unusedSource".
I
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 23:18:25 UTC, Norm wrote:
Can you run dub describe and parse the output, which is JSON I
think. It used to indicate a role for each source file under
each configuration, one of which is "unusedSource".
I don't see any info like that when I run it here... :(
Alternat
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 22:24:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
So the dpldocs scraper right now pulls all the .d files out of
a repo and tries to build docs for them. But in some cases,
there's a lot of added dependencies in there that can cause the
built to time out.
For example, take a look
On 04.03.2018 22:49, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/4/2018 1:16 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04.03.2018 21:40, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/4/2018 4:05 AM, rjframe wrote:
Would I be correct to interpret this as "turn them all off with
-release"?
Array bounds checking is left on with -release.
Not nece
Hi all,
Currently, `guardPageSize` is not stored in core.thread.Fiber.
It's only used during construction, so it's currently not
necessary to store it. However, for Fiber stack usage tracking, I
need it elsewhere too.
Is it agreeable to add an m_guardPageSize member to Fiber to
store the inf
So the dpldocs scraper right now pulls all the .d files out of a
repo and tries to build docs for them. But in some cases, there's
a lot of added dependencies in there that can cause the built to
time out.
For example, take a look at dlangui:
http://dlangui.dpldocs.info/dlangui.html
Notice t
On 3/4/2018 1:16 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04.03.2018 21:40, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/4/2018 4:05 AM, rjframe wrote:
Would I be correct to interpret this as "turn them all off with -release"?
Array bounds checking is left on with -release.
Not necessarily. If the code contains an explicit a
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 15:08:32 UTC, 0x wrote:
The D survey is killing maan!
Those are lots of questions in there
If I ever get hold of the people behind it...
Ehh? No, autism is cute, just take it easy and skip questions you
don't like, you can also jump them by pressing up
On 04.03.2018 21:40, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/4/2018 4:05 AM, rjframe wrote:
Would I be correct to interpret this as "turn them all off with
-release"?
Array bounds checking is left on with -release.
Not necessarily. If the code contains an explicit assertion that the
index is in bounds, t
On 03/03/2018 12:22 AM, ag0aep6g wrote:
So am I missing something or should `tupleof` not be allowed to ignore
`private` in `@safe` code?
Filed an issue: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18554
On 3/4/2018 4:05 AM, rjframe wrote:
Would I be correct to interpret this as "turn them all off with -release"?
Array bounds checking is left on with -release.
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 12:03:32 UTC, aliak wrote:
Maybe this part can be fixed with:
struct NonNull(T) if (isPointer!T || is(T == class))
{
@disable opAssign(V)(V v) {} // no no no
void opAssign(V)(NonNull!V other) { // only this allowed.
Interesting approach -- I'll keep it on the
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 19:20:26 UTC, arturg wrote:
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 18:28:42 UTC, aliak wrote:
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 19:47:23 UTC, SimonN wrote:
If you know of other ways though I'm all ears :)
Cheers
maybe not exactly what you want, but here are some templates i
wrot
On Sat, 03 Mar 2018 20:30:31 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> The default is that they're all on. So to just have one on, first turn
> them all off then turn on the desired ones.
Would I be correct to interpret this as "turn them all off with -release"?
E.g., "dmd -check=in a.d" is unnecessary; it'
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 20:52:25 UTC, SimonN wrote:
The pitfall here is that all structs must be
default-constructible, and then all of the fields have the
static init value:
class A { this(int) { } }
void main()
{
NonNull!A a;
assert (a.value is null);
}
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 19:46:38 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 17:42:25 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
On 3/3/18 8:08 AM, 0x wrote:
The D survey is killing maan!
Those are lots of questions in there
If I ever get hold of the people behind it...
Is it a c
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 19:46:38 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 17:42:25 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
On 3/3/18 8:08 AM, 0x wrote:
The D survey is killing maan!
Those are lots of questions in there
If I ever get hold of the people behind it...
Is it a c
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 17:42:25 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
On 3/3/18 8:08 AM, 0x wrote:
The D survey is killing maan!
Those are lots of questions in there
If I ever get hold of the people behind it...
Is it a coincidence that your user handle is "negative one"? ;)
Oh, really
On 2018-03-04 08:05, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
3. Release of DMD 2.081.0 occurs. "dmd" now points to 2.081.0. Unless
.travis.yml has been manually updated, it still contains:
- dmd # Ie, dmd-2.081.0, now
# WTF?!?! dmd-2.080.0 is no longer being tested
- dmd-2.079.0
28 matches
Mail list logo
