On 10/21/18 11:59 PM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 23:05:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
I'm afraid I'm not familiar with socket.io, and the homepage doesn't
seem to tell me much (it doesn't even say whether it uses TCP or UDP).
But that said, in D, the gold-standard
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 09:51:28AM +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 19 October 2018 at 22:19:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > Haha, I feel so silly now. NDK r13b does not seem to have the
> > sysroot subdir required by the clang build command, that's why it
> > couldn't find
On 10/21/18 1:29 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
No, D should not forget DWT. It's one of the few (they only?) D GUI
toolkit that has a native look and feel.
Apart from GtkD on GTK+ systems, and dqml, QtE5, qtD, and dqt on Qt,
and wxD on wxWidgets. Qt and wxWidgets pride themselves on being able
to
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 04:41:08 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 10/21/18 1:13 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
[...]
First of all, minor nitpick: Unless some bombshell news
occurred that I managed to miss, Ubuntu pushes their own Unity,
NOT Gnome. Yes, that's still GTK, but
On 10/21/18 1:13 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 04:15 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
That's pure nonsense: It's Linux - unless one option actually goes
away
(KDE is still actively used and developed), then there's no such
thing
as one "winning"
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1861
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5749
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11904
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 23:05:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
> I'm afraid I'm not familiar with socket.io, and the homepage doesn't
> seem to tell me much (it doesn't even say whether it uses TCP or UDP).
> But that said, in D, the gold-standard for pretty much *anything*
> related to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4485
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On 10/21/18 7:36 AM, Andre Pany wrote:
While talking about bindings, do not forget Delphi. It has still a good
eco system. Combining Delphi's advanced Runtime reflection capabilities
with D's advanced compile reflection capabilities opens this eco system.
I created a proof of concept and
On 10/21/18 4:58 PM, Fleel wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:41:41 UTC, JN wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:14:46 UTC, Fleel wrote:
Does anyone know of a good D alternative for the socket.IO server
(https://socket.io)? I would like to transition my server from
node.js to D, but I
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19197
Nathan S. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n8sh.second...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 01:08:11 UTC, Manu wrote:
FWIW, I'm disappointed with the quality of my dman shirt; I've
put it
through the wash no more than 3-4 times and the print is
aggressively
deteriorating with each wash.
I don't tend to wear it because it's disintegrating so fast.
I'm
On 10/20/18 11:17 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
So that classes can share some of their variables but not others in a
module.
IE.
class A
{
internal int A; //This is shared in the module
private int B; // But not this.
}
No need to reintroduce the "Friend" feature from cpp.
I've always felt the
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:22:19 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 2:35 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>> Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit
>>
On Saturday, 20 October 2018 at 15:40:07 UTC, karis njiru wrote:
Hi. Am a computer science student from Kenya and decided to use
D for my class project on Principles of Programming Languages.
Am having a lot of fun with D but have come across an issue. I
have been using Visual D for the past 2
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:35:38 -0700, Manu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:15 PM Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>> If we only used your proposal and only used @safe code, we wouldn't
>> have any data races, but that's only because we wouldn't have any
>> shared data. We'd have shared
On Friday, 19 October 2018 at 09:08:32 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
Technically the code you have is syntactically correct. You
are permitted to create a class variable without assigning it
to a class object. (Assigning it to a class object would look
like "A a = new A();")
Which section of The
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:55:00 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 22.10.18 02:46, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:38:33 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I just did,
Link please?
https://forum.dlang.org/post/pqii8k$11u3$1...@digitalmars.com
That contains no code.
Not all of
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:35 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:04:02 UTC, Fleel wrote:
> > It would be awesome if there were T-Shirts with D-man on them.
> > I would totally buy one, and would help to support the
> > foundation too...
>
> We've got a
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:55 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 22.10.18 02:45, Manu wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:35 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 21.10.18 20:46, Manu wrote:
> Shared data is only useful if, at some point, it is read/written,
>
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:40 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 21.10.18 21:04, Manu wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 21.10.18 17:54, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> >>>
> As soon as that is done, you've got a data race
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:46:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
That's what I was referring to, and Manu's example. It doesn't
work, as I pointed out.
I'm pretty sure it does, but please repeat it.
We will eventually. This started as a "please point out any
problems with this" and has
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:50 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2018 4:12 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 21:32:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> >> On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> >>> On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>
On 22.10.18 02:46, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:38:33 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I just did,
Link please?
https://forum.dlang.org/post/pqii8k$11u3$1...@digitalmars.com
On 22.10.18 02:45, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:35 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 21.10.18 20:46, Manu wrote:
Shared data is only useful if, at some point, it is read/written, presumably by
casting it to unshared in @trusted code. As soon as that is done, you've got a
On 10/21/2018 4:12 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 21:32:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit conversion in the
other
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:38:33 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I just did,
Link please?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:35 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 21.10.18 20:46, Manu wrote:
> >> Shared data is only useful if, at some point, it is read/written,
> >> presumably by
> >> casting it to unshared in @trusted code. As soon as that is done, you've
> >> got a
> >> data
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:32:35 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
This only works if untrusted programmers (i.e. programmers who
are only allowed to write/modify @safe code) are not allowed to
change your class. I.e. it does not work.
This is the basis of the current @safe/@trusted/@system model.
On 21.10.18 21:04, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 21.10.18 17:54, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
As soon as that is done, you've got a data race with the other
existing unshared aliases.
You're in @trusted code, that is the whole point. The
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:15 PM Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 12:04:16 -0700, Manu wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> >> Note that there may well be a good way to get the good properties of MP
> >> without
On 21.10.18 20:46, Manu wrote:
Shared data is only useful if, at some point, it is read/written, presumably by
casting it to unshared in @trusted code. As soon as that is done, you've got a
data race with the other existing unshared aliases.
If such a race is possible, then the @trusted
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:04:02 UTC, Fleel wrote:
It would be awesome if there were T-Shirts with D-man on them.
I would totally buy one, and would help to support the
foundation too...
We've got a store coming, with t-shirts and other items. D-man
shirts will not be there, though.
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 21:23:35 UTC, aliak wrote:
Hi, I'm playing around with a recursive template type that
allows for named template parameters. The problem is that it
requires a lot of repetition and becomes more error prone as
the number of named arguments increase. So
1) Any
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 2:35 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> >> Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit conversion in the
> >> other direction, which is not part of the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19325
Issue ID: 19325
Summary: The 'body' keyword is still not deprecated
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 21:48:22 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 17:09:05 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
[...]
It's not "my" solution. It's D's solution. I perfectly
understand why you'd want this and I would probably make use of
a private/internal difference
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 19:53:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, October 20, 2018 9:17:23 PM MDT 12345swordy via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
So that classes can share some of their variables but not
others in a module.
IE.
class A
{
internal int A; //This is shared in the module
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 11:31 AM Manu wrote:
>
> On Sun., 21 Oct. 2018, 2:55 am Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d,
> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/20/2018 11:24 AM, Manu wrote:
> > > This is an unfair dismissal.
> >
> > It has nothing at all to do with fairness. It is about what the type system
> >
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 22:12:18 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 12:04:16 -0700, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Note that there may well be a good way to get the good
properties of MP without breaking the type system, but
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 21:32:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit
conversion in the other direction, which is not part of the
proposal.
It's
On 10/21/2018 1:29 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
There’s a bit more to the story, but it boils down to the fact that since I
don’t have permissions to update the feature branch, I’m basically dead in
the water. So the work is all done and ready, but I have no path forward to
get it in. And it’s a bit
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 12:04:16 -0700, Manu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>> Note that there may well be a good way to get the good properties of MP
>> without breaking the type system, but MP itself is not good because it
>> breaks @safe.
>
> Show
It took me a while to understand Manu's idea for `shared`, and I suspect
that it was/is the same for others. At the same time, Manu seems
bewildered about the objections. I'm going to try and summarize the
situation. Maybe it can help advance the discussion.
(1) How Does Manu's `shared`
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 17:48:08 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:40:36 +, Laurent Tréguier wrote:
This is by design; the D way of dealing with this would be to
split the module into a package with multiple modules.
This is often a usable way of doing things, but
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 17:09:05 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
I know what the current design is!! You have zero tools in
regarding to allowing class to share certain variables but not
others in the same module! Create a module for every class is
taking all or nothing approach, when there is a
Hi,
The code below fails with "Error: delegate
`onlineapp.A!int.A.__dgliteral2` cannot be struct members":
T f(T)(lazy T value) { return value; }
struct A(T) {
immutable a = f("hi");
}
void main() {
A!int i;
}
Removing the lazy keyword fixes the error. But I'm wondering if I
can
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 20:58:23 +, Fleel wrote:
> Can std.socket provide a realtime connection between the client(web
> browser) and the server, like for a chatroom or realtime multiplayer
> game?
Yes, but it will be a bit of work -- you'd need to implement a webserver
by hand that can upgrade
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17647
leeavi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leeavi...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit conversion in the
other direction, which is not part of the proposal.
It's Manu's example.
Then I don't know what the proposal is. Pieces of
Hi, I'm playing around with a recursive template type that allows
for named template parameters. The problem is that it requires a
lot of repetition and becomes more error prone as the number of
named arguments increase. So
1) Any ideas on how to make it less error prone? less repetition?
a
On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit conversion in the
other direction, which is not part of the proposal.
It's Manu's example.
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 19:22:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:50 AM Stanislav Blinov via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Because the whole reason to have `shared` is to avoid the
extraneous checks that you mentioned above,
No, it is to assure that you write correct not-broken
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:41:41 UTC, JN wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:14:46 UTC, Fleel wrote:
Does anyone know of a good D alternative for the socket.IO
server (https://socket.io)? I would like to transition my
server from node.js to D, but I can't find any D equivalents
to
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:04:02 UTC, Fleel wrote:
It would be awesome if there were T-Shirts with D-man on them.
I would totally buy one, and would help to support the
foundation too...
well that cost 100$+
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:35:20 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sun., 21 Oct. 2018, 1:05 pm Fleel via Digitalmars-d, <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
It would be awesome if there were T-Shirts with D-man on them.
I would totally buy one, and would help to support the
foundation too...
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:14:46 UTC, Fleel wrote:
Does anyone know of a good D alternative for the socket.IO
server (https://socket.io)? I would like to transition my
server from node.js to D, but I can't find any D equivalents to
socket.IO. (I've seen http://socket.io.dub.pm, but it is
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 18:24:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-10-21 19:29, Russel Winder wrote:
But who apart from Eclipse and JetBrains uses Java for desktop
GUI
applications?
There's probably a ton of business/enterprise applications that
are written in Java.
But I don't
On Sun., 21 Oct. 2018, 1:05 pm Fleel via Digitalmars-d, <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> It would be awesome if there were T-Shirts with D-man on them. I
> would totally buy one, and would help to support the foundation
> too...
>
Lucky for you, they exist, and you can acquire one by
luckoverthere wrote:
> On Friday, 19 October 2018 at 03:53:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 10/15/2018 2:23 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> I'm giving a presentation at:
>>>
>>> http://nwcpp.org/
>>>
>>> See you there!
>>
>> Had a nice crowd there last night. Apparently lots of people
>> were
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19316
ag0aep6g changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||safe
CC|
Does anyone know of a good D alternative for the socket.IO server
(https://socket.io)? I would like to transition my server from
node.js to D, but I can't find any D equivalents to socket.IO.
(I've seen http://socket.io.dub.pm, but it is dead). Are there
any good D libraries that can do the
It would be awesome if there were T-Shirts with D-man on them. I
would totally buy one, and would help to support the foundation
too...
On Saturday, October 20, 2018 9:17:23 PM MDT 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> So that classes can share some of their variables but not others
> in a module.
>
> IE.
>
> class A
> {
> internal int A; //This is shared in the module
> private int B; // But not this.
> }
>
> No need to
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 19:07:37 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 09:50:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Your proposal makes that impossible because the compiler would
allow unshared data to be implicitly typed as shared.
Yes, but not the other way around.
Whoops
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:50 AM Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 05:47:14 UTC, Manu wrote:
>
> >> And yet, if we're lucky, we get
> >> a consistent instacrash. If we're unlucky, we get memory
> >> corruption, or an unsolicited write to another currently
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 18:45:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd like to add that if the compiler can prove that a T* points
to a unique T, then it can be implicitly cast to shared(T)*.
And it does so, like the result of .dup can be so converted.
This can be achieved by using the unique
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 09:50:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Manu's Proposal ---
@safe:
int i;
int* a =
StartNewThread(a); // Compiles! Coder has no idea!
... in the new thread ...
void StartOfNewThread(shared(int)* b) {
... we have two threads accessing 'i',
one thinks it is
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 21.10.18 17:54, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> >
> >> As soon as that is done, you've got a data race with the other
> >> existing unshared aliases.
> >
> > You're in @trusted code, that is the whole point. The onus is on the
>
On 21.10.18 17:54, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
As soon as that is done, you've got a data race with the other
existing unshared aliases.
You're in @trusted code, that is the whole point. The onus is on the
programmer to make that correct, same with regular @safe/@trusted@system
code.
Not all
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 18:11:37 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-10-18 01:15, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
I need to use docker to build static linked Linux executables.
My reason
is specific, may be different than the OP's. I'm using
Travis-CI to
build executables. Travis-CI uses Ubuntu
I'd like to add that if the compiler can prove that a T* points to a unique T,
then it can be implicitly cast to shared(T)*. And it does so, like the result of
.dup can be so converted.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:00 AM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2018 11:08 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> > You can if no-one else writes to it, which is the whole point of Manu's
> > proposal. Perhaps it should be const shared instead of shared but still.
>
> There is no
DIP 1000 says:
Delegates currently defensively allocate closures with the GC.
Few actually escape, and with scope only those that actually
escape need to have the closures allocated.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1000.md#benefits
On Sun., 21 Oct. 2018, 2:55 am Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d,
wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2018 11:24 AM, Manu wrote:
> > This is an unfair dismissal.
>
> It has nothing at all to do with fairness. It is about what the type system
> guarantees in @safe code. To repeat, the current type system guarantees
On 2018-10-21 19:29, Russel Winder wrote:
But who apart from Eclipse and JetBrains uses Java for desktop GUI
applications?
There's probably a ton of business/enterprise applications that are
written in Java.
But I don't care for that, that's why I'm using D :)
I do not have Eclipse to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19316
Stanislav Blinov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
On 2018-10-18 01:15, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
I need to use docker to build static linked Linux executables. My reason
is specific, may be different than the OP's. I'm using Travis-CI to
build executables. Travis-CI uses Ubuntu 14.04, but static linking fails
on 14.04. The standard C library from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18448
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greeen...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Seb ---
1)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18448
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:40:36 +, Laurent Tréguier wrote:
> This is by design; the D way of dealing with this would be to split the
> module into a package with multiple modules.
This is often a usable way of doing things, but sometimes not so much. If
you're writing a script for use with dub
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18467
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18464
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 12:54 +0200, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
[…]
> As has been stated elsewhere, it's working on Windows and macOS but
> looks very alien on macOS. When I was in school I wrote a program
> using
> C# (Mono) and GTK on macOS. GTK seemed to be the best alternative
On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 12:49 +0200, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2018-10-21 09:33, Russel Winder wrote:
>
> > The SWT framework is being replaced with JavaFX, so should D forget
> > DWT
> > and do something similar?
>
> Where do you get that idea? SWT (and therefore DWT) is using
On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 08:42 +, Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> […]
>
> Linux is not only the desktop, and Qt simply dominates in
> industrial, medical and automation sector, that's where the money
> is.
>
> Qt is pushing strongly on the embedded marked, bare metal or
> linux
On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 04:15 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
>
> That's pure nonsense: It's Linux - unless one option actually goes
> away
> (KDE is still actively used and developed), then there's no such
> thing
> as one "winning" over the other.
Hardly
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 08:40:36 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 03:17:23 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
So that classes can share some of their variables but not
others in a module.
IE.
class A
{
internal int A; //This is shared in the module
private int B; // But
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:47:14 -0700, Manu wrote:
> Looking at the meat of the program; you open a file, and distribute it
> to do accesses (I presume?)
> Naturally, this is a really weird thing to do, because even if the API
> is threadsafe such that it doesn't crash and reads/writes are
>
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 09:58:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/20/2018 11:08 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
You can if no-one else writes to it, which is the whole point
of Manu's proposal. Perhaps it should be const shared instead
of shared but still.
There is no purpose whatsoever to
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 03:17:23 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
So that classes can share some of their variables but not
others in a module.
IE.
class A
{
internal int A; //This is shared in the module
private int B; // But not this.
}
No need to reintroduce the "Friend" feature from cpp.
On Saturday, 20 October 2018 at 16:37:07 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I've also realised that there are parts of C++ that are
probably unstranslatable no matter what I do.
This can be solved with good gui. It need to look like meld on
linux where original cpp and translated d files are side by
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 03:17:23 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
So that classes can share some of their variables but not
others in a module.
IE.
class A
{
internal int A; //This is shared in the module
private int B; // But not this.
}
No need to reintroduce the "Friend" feature from cpp.
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 13:24:49 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 11:25:16 UTC, aliak wrote:
When I say ok, I mean assuming the implementer actually wrote
correct code. This applies to any shared method today as well.
This ("ok") can only be achieved if the
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 10:48:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
What's the fix? Have the compiler insert a call to the
exception's destructor at the end of the `catch(scope
Exception)` block.
If I understood you correctly then we have same idea. If
exception is not handled or re thrown
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 12:45:43 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 05:47:14 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:10 AM Stanislav Blinov via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Synchronized with what? You still have `a`, which isn't
`shared` and doesn't require any
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19316
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18571
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
