On Wednesday, 2 January 2019 at 17:49:52 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 05:38:41PM +, IM via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
1- How do I do in D the equivalent of the following C++ macro?
#define OUT_VAL(val) (count << #val << " = " << val << e
On Wednesday, 2 January 2019 at 21:56:03 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/2/19 12:38 PM, IM wrote:
[...]
With those ... I have to guess.
There are 2 possibilities.
Possibility 1: there is a method named 'doSomeWork' which takes
at least one parameter. This overrides the UFCS function
1- How do I do in D the equivalent of the following C++ macro?
#define OUT_VAL(val) (count << #val << " = " << val << endl)
In particular the #val above to the actual macro argument as a
string?
2- Yesterday I was experimenting with something and I wrote
something like the following:
On Friday, 28 December 2018 at 20:35:44 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
On Friday, 28 December 2018 at 18:50:39 UTC, David Gileadi
wrote:
On 12/28/18 4:14 AM, Laurent Tréguier wrote:
Hello, and merry Christmas! (a bit late, but whatever)
This is an excellent update--the update Just Works™ with
On Monday, 15 October 2018 at 03:33:04 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 15 October 2018 at 03:19:07 UTC, IM wrote:
I probably used to know the answer to this question, but it's
been a long time since I last used D, and I don't remember.
Suppose we have:
struct S {
int num;
}
Would
I probably used to know the answer to this question, but it's
been a long time since I last used D, and I don't remember.
Suppose we have:
struct S {
int num;
}
Would allocating an instance on the heap using:
S* s = new S;
use the GC, or do we have to call destroy() or delete on s
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 20:56:51 UTC, tide wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 07:57:49 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
[...]
Code-d overcomplicates things I find though. I can't even build
it, there's so many dependencies attached to it that it isn't
worth looking through to even
On Friday, 4 May 2018 at 00:13:42 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)
wrote:
On 05/03/2018 05:09 PM, IM wrote:
I can't wait to watch.
Not sure if you're specifically talking about the videos being
split up per talk, but you can rewatch the full first two days
livestreams here:
Day 1 Afternoon
I can't wait to watch.
On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 at 21:33:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
This has been long overdue but I would like to announce that
I've just released an official Dub package for the DWT library
[1]. For a usage example, please see the GitHub page [2].
[...]
This is great, thanks!
Any plans
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 at 17:43:36 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.078.0.
This release comes with runtime detection of Visual Studio
installation paths, an integral promotion transition for unary
operations on byte and short sized integers, more -betterC
features, and a
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 16:32:50 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:57:08AM +, Patrick Schluter via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 18:32:37 UTC, Pjotr Prins wrote:
[...]
> I am just going to share my thoughts a little. Github, in my
> opinion, is
On Sunday, 31 December 2017 at 21:16:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/31/2017 8:18 AM, IM wrote:
What do you think? Do you agree that a process is needed?
We've tried adding process before. It does not work, for the
simple reason that it requires a dedicated group of people to
dedicate
On Sunday, 31 December 2017 at 07:43:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/30/2017 11:23 PM, IM wrote:
While we are discussing it here, could you please let me know
what the bug triage process for each release cycle is? Is it
random that anyone picks up whatever bug s/he feels like
fixing? Or is
On Sunday, 31 December 2017 at 05:43:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/30/2017 6:42 AM, Muld wrote:
In contrast this same problem exists for Bugzilla. You say
it's working cause it's better than using notepad or some
other stupid shit. Bugzilla isn't the issue, it's the fact the
people
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 17:29:47 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 07:53:51 UTC, IM wrote:
-- Better compiler errors, better compiler errors, better
compiler errors.
This is the only thing I greatly care about anymore. Biggest
problem D has in real world
On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 01:40:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 23:24:45 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
That's been closed for a while now.
Well, take your pick:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12694
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13340
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 07:55:08 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
But maybe you can propose cjange from ref R r to auto ref R r
If this will make it work with both lvalues and rvalues, then
yes, this would be a nice fix. No need to force users to cache
string line = readln(); first and then
I will start:
-- Better compiler errors, better compiler errors, better
compiler errors.
I really wish that the compiler errors could receive some
refinement. Mostly it feels like some error text just being
thrown at me. It needs to be better formatted, more helpful, with
suggestions
The following code:
int guess;
readln().formattedRead!"%d"(guess);
produces the following compiler error:
Error: template std.format.formattedRead cannot deduce function
from argument types !("%s")(string, int), candidates are:
/usr/include/dmd/phobos/std/format.d(635):
The following expression:
import std.math : sqrt;
sqrt(400);
produces the following compiler error:
std.math.sqrt called with argument types (int) matches both:
/usr/include/dmd/phobos/std/math.d(1592,7):
std.math.sqrt(float x)
and:
/usr/include/dmd/phobos/std/math.d(1598,6):
On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 21:34:48 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 03:15:11 UTC, IM wrote:
https://code.dlang.org/packages/libdtasks
I'd get rid of the ITaskRunner interface and rename
AbstractTaskRunner to TaskRunner. Interfaces are fine when you
need
I'm still looking for feedback about these points:
- Any candidate class that can be better switched to a struct
or even a template?
- The use of shared and __gshared, did I get those right? I
find the TLS concept unpleasant, because it makes me unsure
what's the right thing to do. For
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 12:51:07 UTC, rjframe wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:15:11 +, IM wrote:
[...]
I like this API design.
I would separate each unit test to its own `unittest` block
(you have three tests in a single block in
`SingleThreadTaskRunner.d`); it doesn't really
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 07:47:58 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/13/2017 07:57 PM, IM wrote:
> - Is this the idiomatic way to define a singleton in D?:
>
https://gitlab.com/3d_immortal/libdtasks/blob/master/src/tasks/TaskSystem.d#L24.
> I got this from Ali's book.
I think you
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 04:12:33 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 14/12/2017 3:57 AM, IM wrote:
snip
- Is this the idiomatic way to define a singleton in D?:
https://gitlab.com/3d_immortal/libdtasks/blob/master/src/tasks/TaskSystem.d#L24.
You say singleton I think wrong.
Use
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 07:30:55 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 06:14:04 bauss via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Documentation can be done like this for multiline:
/**
* ...
* ...
* etc.
*/
Instead of:
/// ...
/// ...
/// etc.
You can also do
/**
...
...
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 07:02:47 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/12/2017 07:15 PM, IM wrote:
I started learning D recently.
Welcome! There is also the Learn newsgroup[1]. ;)
Ali
[1] Available through a forum interface here:
http://forum.dlang.org/group/learn
Thanks, I posted a
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 06:14:04 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 03:15:11 UTC, IM wrote:
Thanks!
First thing.
Generally in D module names are kept lower-case.
To give an example your:
AbstractTaskRunner.d
module tasks.AbstractTaskRunner;
Would usually be:
I started learning D recently. As part of the learning process, I
started working on some D projects to experiment and learn. My
first project is a tasking system library that I plan to use in
another D project I'm working on.
The goal is to be able to post and run any task asynchronously on
On Saturday, 9 December 2017 at 10:36:08 UTC, Messenger wrote:
On Saturday, 9 December 2017 at 09:38:05 UTC, IM wrote:
For purposes of debugging, I'm using writeln() to print stuff
out from tasks running concurrently on many threads. At some
point it crashes with the following stack trace:
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 01:12:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/9/2017 5:56 AM, Seb wrote:
IIRC the implementation of LockingTextWriter isn't thread-safe.
There's no bugzilla issue on this. So I added one:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18052
Please, folks, I can't
For purposes of debugging, I'm using writeln() to print stuff out
from tasks running concurrently on many threads. At some point it
crashes with the following stack trace:
Thread 4 received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
[Switching to Thread 0x75ec2700 (LWP 19267)]
On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 23:16:54 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/06/2017 03:01 PM, IM wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 07:54:21 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
>> On 12/05/2017 11:23 PM, IM wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Just remove the override keywords in this case. No function
is
>>
On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 07:54:21 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/05/2017 11:23 PM, IM wrote:
[...]
Just remove the override keywords in this case. No function is
overriding any implementation here, they both implement an
interface function. The fact that override can be used for
Assume the following:
interface IFace {
void foo();
void bar();
}
abstract class A : IFace {
override void foo() {}
}
class B : A {
override void bar() {}
}
Now why this fails to compiler with the following message:
--->>>
function bar does not override any function, did you mean to
On Monday, 27 November 2017 at 08:33:42 UTC, IM wrote:
- More exposure. I sometimes feel like there isn't enough D
material to consume on a regular basis (and I and certainly
many others are eager to learn more and more about the
language). i.e. one blog post (weekly?), and a single DConf
On Monday, 27 November 2017 at 02:56:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/26/2017 4:14 PM, IM wrote:
I'm a full-time C++ software engineer in Silicon Valley. I've
been learning D and using it in a couple of personal side
projects for a few months now.
Great! Glad you're enjoying it and took
On Monday, 27 November 2017 at 05:11:06 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Monday, 27 November 2017 at 00:14:40 UTC, IM wrote:
- It's quite clear that D was influenced a lot by Java at
some point, which led to borrowing (copying?) a lot of Java
features that may not appeal to everyone.
Have you
On Monday, 27 November 2017 at 03:01:24 UTC, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
Forum discussions are valuable venue. Since you are in Silicon
Valley, you might also consider attending one of the Silicon
Valley D meetups
(https://www.meetup.com/D-Lang-Silicon-Valley). It's hard to
beat face-to-face
Hi,
I'm a full-time C++ software engineer in Silicon Valley. I've
been learning D and using it in a couple of personal side
projects for a few months now.
First of all, I must start by saying that I like D, and wish to
use it everyday. I'm even considering to donate to the D
foundation.
41 matches
Mail list logo
