On 22/03/18 16:45, Radu wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 11:58:02 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 22/03/18 12:28, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[...]
"The central failure of the language is the myopic focus on the
affine typing solution to
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 16:08:07 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD
language requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] -
On 22.03.2018 12:16, Atila Neves wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD language
requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steelman_language_requirements
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 11:16:37 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I wonder how they concluded that.
Atila
I too.
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 14:49:17 UTC, Ali wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 11:16:37 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD
language requirements [0].
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 11:58:02 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Interesting that the author's criticism of Rust lines up very
closely with Andrei's.
Spoken on the forum for a language that has still not managed
to make sure that a destructor actually gets called every time
an object is
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 11:16:37 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD
language requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] -
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 11:58:02 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 22/03/18 12:28, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[...]
"The central failure of the language is the myopic focus on
the affine typing solution to heap allocation and thread
On 22/03/18 12:28, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD language
requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steelman_language_requirements
"The
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD
language requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steelman_language_requirements
Rust has by far the most support for
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD
language requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steelman_language_requirements
"The central failure of the language is
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
1D. Efficiency.
Judging by parasail example in wikipedia it looks allocation
heavy. Things like
Println("About to insert " | Key | " => " | Val);
Presumably because it doesn't have variadic arguments?
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 16:19:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
I do not understand the meaning of "subscript ranges"? Isn't
this slicing?
AFAICT, "subscript" in the spec just means the range of valid
array indices (it's old terminology from the 70's / 80's).
In which case, it is not
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:08:07PM +, Martin Tschierschke via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[...]
> > [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steelman_language_requirements
>
> Interesting!
>
> Do you understand this:
>
> > 7H. Formal
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD
language requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steelman_language_requirements
Interesting!
Do you understand this:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD
language requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steelman_language_requirements
It seems very biased with the
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD language
requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steelman_language_requirements
17 matches
Mail list logo
