On 29/07/12 13:43, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On Sunday, 29 July 2012 at 06:08:18 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Due to the upcoming release, there will be no regular pull
walk-through tomorrow. Thanks for the growing rate of contribution,
and let's resume the ritual next Sunday.
Andrei
I
Am Mon, 30 Jul 2012 01:37:30 -0400
schrieb Nick Sabalausky seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:56:48 +0200
Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de wrote:
if I had access to a Wiki about D...
You do!
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi
I knew of this, but it
On Monday, 30 July 2012 at 12:18:27 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Technically I'd prefer a database of existing D stuff, and
dynamic web pages that filter by category/C bindings/last
update etc.
That's exactly what I have been planning to build on a free
weekend – would be very useful, at least
On Monday, 30 July 2012 at 12:26:43 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
That's exactly what I have been planning to build […]
(my concept also includes a few slightly more advanced features,
like SCM activity monitoring to sort out dead projects, …)
On 2012-07-30 10:31, Don Clugston wrote:
I guess the easiest way to do this would be to have a single, permanent
branch called 'release', that is used for all releases, rather than
creating a release branch for each compiler version.
Yes, exactly. The only reason for keeping the branches
On Monday, 30 July 2012 at 12:26:43 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
That's exactly what I have been planning to build on a free
weekend – would be very useful, at least until we have an
»official« package manager.
Me too... my little dpldocs.info
http://dpldocs.info/
is supposed to be eventually
I find that we lack a way to search for ported C headers or D alternatives that
do the same. So I started a Wiki page here:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?CLibraryBindings
Not sure if it is useful there. I'd like to see dynamic pages on dlang.org in a
distant future, which make searching
Am 30.07.2012 16:50, schrieb Marco Leise:
I find that we lack a way to search for ported C headers or D alternatives that
do the same. So I started a Wiki page here:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?CLibraryBindings
Not sure if it is useful there. I'd like to see dynamic pages on dlang.org
Am Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:30:21 +0200
schrieb David d...@dav1d.de:
Am 30.07.2012 16:50, schrieb Marco Leise:
I find that we lack a way to search for ported C headers or D alternatives
that do the same. So I started a Wiki page here:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?CLibraryBindings
Am 30.07.2012 16:50, schrieb Marco Leise:
I find that we lack a way to search for ported C headers or D alternatives that
do the same. So I started a Wiki page here:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?CLibraryBindings
Not sure if it is useful there. I'd like to see dynamic pages on dlang.org
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:37:44 +0200
Pragma Tix pragma...@orange.fr wrote:
Am 30.07.2012 16:50, schrieb Marco Leise:
I find that we lack a way to search for ported C headers or D
alternatives that do the same. So I started a Wiki page here:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?CLibraryBindings
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Nick Sabalausky
seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote:
Yea, there's also a page about DMD's internals that's always been
frustratingly difficult to find. I think the only way you've ever been
able to get to it is through the index or a direct URL, and I
Le 29/07/2012 21:16, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2012-07-29 16:28, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm all for it. We're just too busy most of the time to stop and improve
our process. I think it's a good opportunity to do so right after 2.060.
It should have happened a long time ago.
Ranting
On 7/30/2012 7:50 AM, Marco Leise wrote:
I find that we lack a way to search for ported C headers or D alternatives
that do the same. So I started a Wiki page here:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?CLibraryBindings
Not sure if it is useful there. I'd like to see dynamic pages on dlang.org in
On 7/30/12 11:08 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 29/07/2012 21:16, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2012-07-29 16:28, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm all for it. We're just too busy most of the time to stop and improve
our process. I think it's a good opportunity to do so right after 2.060.
It should
15 matches
Mail list logo
