On 18 May 2013 21:01, Rory McGuire wrote:
> Hi Iain,
>
> On 18 May 2013 12:41, "Iain Buclaw" wrote:
> >...
> >
> > Rory... so we meet again. :)
>
> Are you from selection.co.uk?
>
Certainly am, however I wouldn't have thought you'd need to ask... I have
both the benefit and burden of having a
On 18 May 2013 21:02, Dicebot wrote:
> Are there any practical reasons for this other than no one actually
> cared to keep ABI synced?
>
The D ABI used by DMD is bespoke, and there are some problems in 64bit C
ABI.
LDC afaik has a half and half situation which is no good to anyone.
GDC uses wh
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:54:26 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
Besides other issues, the most fundamental is that the various
D compilers are actually not ABI-compatible.
Oh shi~. New discoveries every day. That is.. inconvenient. Kind
of delays any possibility of proper packaging a lot. I a
Hi Iain,
On 18 May 2013 12:41, "Iain Buclaw" wrote:
>...
>
> Rory... so we meet again. :)
Are you from selection.co.uk?
> Looks like a nifty tool. However many projects use wildly different build
system's - all mine use make, some people prefer waf or cmake - or may
provide configuration file
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:18:54 UTC, Mr. Anonymous wrote:
Is the wiki readonly?
http://wiki.dlang.org/IDEs
I've tried to update the "Last known activity" date, but I
couldn't find the Edit button.
You need to be logged in. The Edit tab will then appear in place
of the View Source one.
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:22:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I thought about asking your advice on this topic but it was not
urgent enough :) What currently prevents having different
runtimes but single phobos library for different compilers?
Besides other issues, the most fundamental is that the
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:19:10 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Agreed. I had this discussion recently too along the topic of:
Should we
allow people to install libphobos/libdruntime in a common
library
directory, or keep it private as an integral part of the
compiler? IMO,
giving given it's c
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 10:39:39 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
a new version of Visual D is long overdue, so finally it is
released. In addition to the usual fixes of bugs and
regressions, the major highlights of this version are
- DParser by Alexander Bothe
(https://github.com/aBothe
On 18 May 2013 20:09, Brad Roberts wrote:
> On 5/18/13 8:59 AM, nazriel wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 15:26:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 14:19:08 UTC, nazriel wrote:
>>>
Will be shared library installed alongside with static library?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>
On 5/18/13 8:59 AM, nazriel wrote:
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 15:26:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 14:19:08 UTC, nazriel wrote:
Will be shared library installed alongside with static library?
Yes.
Cool!
Will libdruntime.so belong to druntime package?
No. Currently t
On Friday, 17 May 2013 at 17:39:42 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 15.05.2013 23:19, alex wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 10:39:39 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
Hi,
a new version of Visual D is long overdue, so finally it is
released.
In addition to the usual fixes of bugs and regressions,
Oh right you are. My apologies :) however I still like the name dip.
I'm open to any other 3 letter words.
On 18 May 2013 11:15, "Marco Nembrini" wrote:
> On 18.05.2013 08:55, Rory McGuire wrote:
>
> Regarding dip vs DIP the same exists in python.
>>
>>
> In Python they are pip (the installer) a
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 15:26:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 14:19:08 UTC, nazriel wrote:
Will be shared library installed alongside with static library?
Yes.
Cool!
Will libdruntime.so belong to druntime package?
No. Currently there is no separate druntime package
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 14:19:08 UTC, nazriel wrote:
Will be shared library installed alongside with static library?
Yes.
Will libdruntime.so belong to druntime package?
No. Currently there is no separate druntime package as druntime
is part of phobos binary. This will be a separate is
Am 18.05.2013 00:53, schrieb Rory McGuire:> I've started working
on a little experimental package manager
as DUB is similar and already quite far, it would be cool if you
would join forces there, instead of trying a different path.
Regards,
Tavi
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 09:17:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I have reached conceptual agreement with dmd package maintainer
(Sven-Hendrik Haase), new PKGBUILD's are written and change is
planned together with 2.063 release.
Important stuff to be aware of (mostly important to AUR
packagers):
*
On May 18, 2013 12:21 AM, "Rory McGuire" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've started working on a little experimental package manager
https://github.com/rjmcguire/dip that works similar to golang's go command.
> I've only tested it on linux amd64.
>
> At the moment the commands that work are (these are ex
On Friday, 17 May 2013 at 22:52:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The last question in the video was if it would work in Linux
too, and idk about the rest of their setup, but the C++ binding
is something I've done before, and the code is virtually
identical to what Manu did.
That's good to know, a
I have reached conceptual agreement with dmd package maintainer
(Sven-Hendrik Haase), new PKGBUILD's are written and change is
planned together with 2.063 release.
Important stuff to be aware of (mostly important to AUR
packagers):
* dmd now provides virtual package "d-compiler" of version t
On 18.05.2013 08:55, Rory McGuire wrote:
Regarding dip vs DIP the same exists in python.
In Python they are pip (the installer) and PEP (Python Enhanchment
Proposal), so no confusion there.
20 matches
Mail list logo
