On 24-Aug-2015 15:01, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
# aammm
Associative arrays with manual memory management
All enries and buckets would be dealocated and disposed by internal
implementation's destructor.
The destructor is called by garbage collector (by
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
It would be nice to have a test example for other allocators. I'm
especially interested in how much speed we can gain with using a
non-shared BlockAllocator in combination with
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 18:43:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello everyone,
Following an increasing desire to focus on working on the D
language and foundation, I have recently made the difficult
decision to part ways with Facebook, my employer of five years
and nine months.
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
Nice! I'll try this!
auto a = AA!(string, int, shared Mallocator)
When does the third parameter need to be qualified as `shared`?
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 09:20 +, John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
-announce wrote:
[…]
Not a one man shop. Ilya Yaroshenko is helping a lot, Lars T
Kyllingstad is on board (along with SciD) and there are many
others who are getting involved in some way.
Anyone else who's interested should
On 26 August 2015 at 00:55, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 at 21:43:11 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
The work done on GDC is well appreciated, GDC's codebase is much cleaner
now than it was before the refactoring.
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 06:50:26 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
It would be nice to have a test example for other allocators.
I'm especially interested in how much speed we can
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 06:50:26 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
It would be nice to have a test example for other allocators.
I'm especially interested in how much speed we can
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 06:41:41 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Nice! I'll try this!
auto a = AA!(string, int, shared Mallocator)
When does the third parameter need to be qualified as `shared`?
Only if you would use a
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 05:51:06 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 25-Aug-2015 23:04, bachmeier wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 at 19:29:06 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
I can't agree more. OK maybe I would add this
https://twitter.com/kozzi11/status/636190895856091136 ;-)
This is a big
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 06:52:01 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
auto a = AA!(string, int, shared
Mallocator)(Mallocator.instance);
Sure hope a factory to do IFTI is available? So that the
following works:
auto a = aa!(string, int)(Mallocator.instance); // 3rd CT
param is
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 10:48:11 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
auto a = aa!(string, int)(Mallocator.instance); // 3rd CT
highlights
It would be nice to also see an example at
https://github.com/arexeu/aammm
that shows AA-usage in conjunction with some other allocator such
as FreeList and
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 14:21:41 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
It is possible but not so useful, thought.
Why is it not so useful?
`AA!(...).Entry.sizeof` and `AA!(...).Entry.alignof` should be
accessible from user code since v0.0.3 . They can be used to
construct allocators. I will
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 12:10:17 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
highlights
It would be nice to also see an example at
https://github.com/arexeu/aammm
that shows AA-usage in conjunction with some other allocator
such as FreeList and add a note about the performance
improvement this gives.
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 14:24:54 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 14:21:41 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
It is possible but not so useful, thought.
Why is it not so useful?
Because looks like allocators have different additional params,
that dose not related to
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 13:12:38 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 09:20:33 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Only if you would use a shared allocator like Mallocator or
GCAllocator.
Are there cases where a non-shared version of Mallocator or
GCAllocator is motivated?
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 09:20:33 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Only if you would use a shared allocator like Mallocator or
GCAllocator.
Are there cases where a non-shared version of Mallocator or
GCAllocator is motivated?
If not could, maybe the shared-ness could be inferred?
On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 20:06:46 UTC, Andre Polykanine wrote:
Cool, but could you please make your captcha accessible
without
Andre, I do not understand what is wrong with captcha?
Write a Russian, it will be better :)
On 26-Aug-2015 12:20, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 05:51:06 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 25-Aug-2015 23:04, bachmeier wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 at 19:29:06 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
I can't agree more. OK maybe I would add this
19 matches
Mail list logo
