On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 00:05:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 10:58:39 AM MDT aliak via
Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
This will break compilation of current code that has an
explicit copy constructor, and the fix is simply to add the
attribute
On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 00:05:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 10:58:39 AM MDT aliak via
Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
This will break compilation of current code that has an
explicit copy constructor, and the fix is simply to add the
attribute
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 10:58:39 AM MDT aliak via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> This will break compilation of current code that has an explicit
> copy constructor, and the fix is simply to add the attribute
> @implicit.
In that case, why not just use a transitional compiler switch? Why
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 20:00:21 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
Just reposting here two links Johannes left in the Slack:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-09/msg00931.html
"The D Language Front-End Is Trying Now To Get Into GCC 9
Going on for a while now have been D language
Just reposting here two links Johannes left in the Slack:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-09/msg00931.html
"The D Language Front-End Is Trying Now To Get Into GCC 9
Going on for a while now have been D language front-end patches
for GCC to allow this programming language to be
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:34:10 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:20:26 UTC, Atila Neves
wrote:
The `shared` keyword currently means one of two things:
1. You can use core.atomic with it
2. It's some struct and you BYOM (Bring Your Own Mutex)
[...]
Why is
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:20:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
The `shared` keyword currently means one of two things:
1. You can use core.atomic with it
2. It's some struct and you BYOM (Bring Your Own Mutex)
[...]
Why is this is an external 3rd party library isn't of the
standard
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:20:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
The `shared` keyword currently means one of two things:
1. You can use core.atomic with it
2. It's some struct and you BYOM (Bring Your Own Mutex)
[...]
Whahh!! You made my day!
/Paolo
The `shared` keyword currently means one of two things:
1. You can use core.atomic with it
2. It's some struct and you BYOM (Bring Your Own Mutex)
Do you have to send mutable data to other threads? Are you tired
of locking a mutex and casting? Now you don't have to:
On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 23:32:39 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2018 5:07:22 PM MDT Manu via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
Except that @implicit could be introduced for other
constructors without having it on copy constructors, and the
fact that copy
10 matches
Mail list logo
