On 25.01.21 21:03, Paul Backus wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 12:48:48 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
But, at the same time, I guess it could be a bit demoralizing you know?
That's true.
I beg to differ. Open issues are not demoralizing.
Sometimes, reality is demoralizing. That doesn't mean w
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 21:25:28 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[snip]
I think we're looking at this in the wrong way. [snip]
AKA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:03:53PM +, Paul Backus via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 12:48:48 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
> > But, at the same time, I guess it could be a bit demoralizing you
> > know?
>
> That's true. Sometimes, reality is demoralizing. That doesn't
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 12:48:48 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
But, at the same time, I guess it could be a bit demoralizing
you know?
That's true. Sometimes, reality is demoralizing. That doesn't
mean we should hide our heads in the sand and ignore it.
It's kinda obvious when you push it to
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 13:04:42 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 25.01.21 11:05, Imperatorn wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 06:59:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 25.01.21 07:46, Imperatorn wrote:
Proposed solution:
Archive issues older than 10 years (and maybe some critera
based on latest upd
On 25.01.21 13:48, Imperatorn wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 10:39:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/24/2021 10:46 PM, Imperatorn wrote:
Imo it's reasonable to close or archive issues that are older than 10
years.
We are not going to do that just because they are old.
If a bug still ex
On 25.01.21 11:05, Imperatorn wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 06:59:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 25.01.21 07:46, Imperatorn wrote:
Proposed solution:
Archive issues older than 10 years (and maybe some critera based on
latest updated). If they are relevant, it's the authors
responsibility t
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 10:39:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/24/2021 10:46 PM, Imperatorn wrote:
Imo it's reasonable to close or archive issues that are older
than 10 years.
We are not going to do that just because they are old.
If a bug still exists in the current DMD, the bug repor
On 1/24/2021 10:46 PM, Imperatorn wrote:
Imo it's reasonable to close or archive issues that are older than 10 years.
We are not going to do that just because they are old.
If a bug still exists in the current DMD, the bug report stays open.
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 06:59:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 25.01.21 07:46, Imperatorn wrote:
Proposed solution:
Archive issues older than 10 years (and maybe some critera
based on latest updated). If they are relevant, it's the
authors responsibility to update the issue so that it's
repro
10 matches
Mail list logo
