On Thursday, 16 September 2021 at 14:35:08 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
In my experience, the only severity settings most people
actually use when filing issues on Bugzilla are "enhancement",
"normal", and "regression". And when people do use the other
settings, there's no consistency to how they
In my summary of last month's D Language Foundation meeting, I
mentioned that we discussed a system intended to reward
contributors who contribute pull requests that fix Bugzilla
issues. This was Razvan Nitu's baby from conception to
implementation, and we all think it is a great idea.
The sy
Okay folks, here's the list of accepted talks and the speakers
who will be giving them, in no particular order:
* Life Outside the Big 4: The Adventure of D on OpenBSD -- Brian
Callahan
* Metaprogramming in D (Making programming fun again) -- Bradley
Chatha
* Graphql for D: Do the Boring Thin
On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 15:19:23 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 15:06:48 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been accepted with a request for changes. Walter and Paul
are working out the details.
Congratulations Paul!
This is why I didn't announce it yet. It isn't formally
On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 13:00:43 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 07:09:15 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
[snip]
Regarding DIPs, any news on status of DIP 1038? It has been on
formal assesment over three months now.
It's been accepted with a request for changes. Walter and
The D Language Foundation meeting for the month of August took
place on Friday, August 27, at 13:00 UTC. Participating were:
* Walter Bright
* Átila Neves
* Andrei Alexandrescu
* Ali Çehreli
* Razvan Nitu
* Max Haughton
* Me
## Topics discussed
### SAOC application to solve "dub dependency hel
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 12:19:13 UTC, russhy wrote:
It's disappointing to hear that "the community" response was
negative, how can someone be against the DIP? this is beyond me
Some people wanted it, some people didn't. That's life. That's
true for every DIP, sometimes weighted in
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 08:12:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1041, "Attributes for Higher-Order Functions", has been
postponed by request of the DIP author. T
And [here's a link to the
DIP](https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/b30b94d40bd76b513d31509f8e40f7c38d111929/DIPs/other/DIP1041.
DIP 1041, "Attributes for Higher-Order Functions", has been
postponed by request of the DIP author. The policy on Postponed
DIPs is described in [the DIP process
documentation](https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/docs/process-reviews.md#postponed-and-abandoned-dips).
The DIP author has d
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 07:09:15 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The author of DIP 1039, "Static Arrays with Inferred Length",
has requested that the DIP be withdrawn from the review process.
And [here's a link to the
DIP](https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/ed2e3cd40bec660bab0e65b38e62b063973
The author of DIP 1039, "Static Arrays with Inferred Length", has
requested that the DIP be withdrawn from the review process.
After the first round of community review, he felt the general
response was negative, and that he needed a strong argument to
show the cost-benefit of the proposed feat
On Friday, 3 September 2021 at 15:47:41 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Has it really been 15 months since I last posted an article?
Um, yes. Yes, it has.
Good to see you back, Ron.
On Wednesday, 1 September 2021 at 10:32:19 UTC, Ahmet Sait wrote:
Must have been an encoding issue with the mail then. I don't
mind though.
I updated the blog as soon as I saw Ali's post.
On Wednesday, 1 September 2021 at 04:56:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 8/30/21 5:47 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
> Ahmet Sait KoC’ak
Being a fellow Turkish, I am curios why his last name is
spelled that way. Unless it was sepecially requested by him, I
would use the following obviously correct spell
Five projects have been selected for SAOC 2021. I've summarized
them on the blog.
I would like to point out that the quality of the applications
this year was top-notch. Thanks to the applicants for putting in
the effort. I hope they all put the same effort into their weekly
forum updates and
Through much of July, Razvan Nitu and Eduard Staniloiu organized
and carried out their third D Summer School at University
POLITEHNICA of Bucharest. This time, they did several things
differently, leading to their biggest event yet. They've provided
some details on the blog:
https://dlang.org
A couple of months back I started work on cutting down the DConf
Online 2020 Q & A videos that I had uploaded to the D Language
Foundation's YouTube channel. For the original uploads, I simply
cut them out of the live stream, added a title and some fades,
then uploaded with no edits.
A few mo
Thanks to everyone who submitted an application to the Symmetry
Autumn of Code 2021. The SAOC judges will review the applications
over the next few days. I'll inform each applicant of their
status on August 25th, and will publish a blog post describing
the accepted projects shortly thereafter.
On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 10:58:58 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 06:37:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
* Joseph Rushton Wakeling representing Frequenz
I know Joseph, but haven't heard of Frequenz. Can't find them
on https://dlang.org/orgs-using-d.html. Is there any n
### Background
At the end of 2018, the DLF began hosting quarterly meetings with
representatives from companies using D in production. The
motivation was to provide the companies with a means to directly
communicate their headaches, issues, and ideas to the D
maintainers. Their success is D's
At the last Beerconf, there was a discussion about creating some
Beerconf t-shirts. Now, thanks to Iain Buclaw, we've got
BEERCONF! shirts in our DLang Swag Emporium.
The BEERCONF! category isn't showing up right now, but when it
eventually does, you can find it on the home page here:
https:
On Tuesday, 29 June 2021 at 21:35:56 UTC, matheus wrote:
Was the meeting recorded? Where can we watch?
Matheus.
No, it was not recorded. And no, we aren't going to start
recording them.
The monthly DLF meeting this month took place on June 25. It
lasted a little over an hour-and-a-half. We discussed a number of
topics which, as always, led to notes for further discussion in
future meetings.
Walter, Atila, Andrei, Razvan, Max, and I attended (no I did not
leave out Ali by mis
I've posted a collective announcement of recent big happenings in
D Land with all the relevant links. The SAoC 2021 and DConf
Online 2021 pages are live with the information you need to
submit proposals. Looking forward to see what comes around!
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/06/18/d-ne
Symmetry has confirmed: we are doing SAOC 2021 and it kicks off
on September 15. And I can confirm that DConf Online 2021 is
happening in November. I'll be formally announcing both on the D
Blog soon, with dates, deadlines, and details.
I'm announcing informally here first primarily because I
On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 11:10:36 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Phobos v2 is an official plan? That was news for me! Any chance
to get a glimpse of what's planned for it?
The overall goal is that it doesn't replace the current Phobos,
but sits alongside it. Changed/improved/new functionality goes in
Dylan Graham writes about his experience using D in a
microcontroller project and why he chose it. Does anyone know of
any similar projects using D? I don't. This may well be the first
time it's been employed in this specific manner.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/06/01/driving-with-d/
I have just handed off DIP 1038, "@nodiscard", to Walter and
Atila for their final verdict. They will have 30 days to reach a
decision, ask for changes, or otherwise inform us of the status
of the DIP.
You can read the current revision here:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/0f872db7c0729441
On Friday, 28 May 2021 at 14:56:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
We've just completed our monthly meeting for the month of May
2021. One decision we made is to start providing summaries of
the topics discussed. Hence this forum post.
The participants: Walter, Atila, Andrei, Razvan, Max, and me.
An
We've just completed our monthly meeting for the month of May
2021. One decision we made is to start providing summaries of the
topics discussed. Hence this forum post.
The participants: Walter, Atila, Andrei, Razvan, Max, and me.
### Goals & Tasks
The primary topic on our agenda for this mee
The authors of DIP 1036, "String Interpolation Tuple Literals",
have chosen to withdraw it from consideration in deference to an
alternative proposal currently being drafted here:
https://github.com/John-Colvin/YAIDIP
From the DIP review process documentation:
Unlike Abandoned DIPs, a Withdra
On Tuesday, 25 May 2021 at 00:58:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/24/21 8:38 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
OK, I'm just concerned people will see the pattern:
```d
somecfunc(str.toStringz);
```
and think that's the end of it.
Yeah. Good point. I've updated the post.
On Monday, 24 May 2021 at 16:16:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Nice article!
Thanks!
Note that there is a huge pitfall awaiting you if you use
`toStringz`: garbage collection. You may want to amend the
article to identify this pitfall.
And I'm not talking about requiring `@nogc`,
On Monday, 24 May 2021 at 15:10:46 UTC, sighoya wrote:
There are at least two more posts worth of information to go
into on this topic, but everything in this post is enough to
cover many use cases of D to C string interop.
Which posts did you think of?
I describe them in the Conclusion:
On Monday, 24 May 2021 at 15:03:20 UTC, zjh wrote:
I always think there is something wrong with the JS of ` D blog
site`.
I can't use chrome to open it.
I'm looking at it in Chrome right now. Are you saying it doesn't
open at all for you or there are rendering issues, or...?
The latest post in the D and C series dives into the weeds of D
and C strings: how they're implemented, when you need to
NUL-terminate your D strings and when you don't, and how the
storage of literals in memory allows you to avoid NUL termination
in one case you might not have considered and a
Razvan Nitu, one of the foundation's two Pull Request Managers
funded by Symmetry Investments, talks about the work he's been
doing and two initiatives intended to motivate contributions to
the core D projects.
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/05/18/a-pull-request-managers-perspective/
I've also s
This news round-up serves as the "public-facing" announcement of
the latest D release, a hint at the upcoming LDC beta, and word
on GDC progress. I've also included the formal announcement of
the SAOC 2020 results, and a reminder about a couple of Github
repositories where anyone looking to sha
On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 12:27:56 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Just implementation deficiency. I think it is fixable with some
refactoring of the GC pipeline. One approach would be, (similar
to other language implementations - see below), that
GC-allocated objects with destruct
On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 08:15:01 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
In the mean time a good rule of thumb is to qualify all class
destructors as @nogc. I suggest you add this advice to the
article, Mike.
I actually don't agree with that. I'll be discussion the solution
in the next article:
Some of you will have already heard that we didn't make it into
GSoC 2021. Every year Google receives over 500 organization
applications, but they can only accept ~200. I have no insights
into their decision process, but I do believe our application was
stronger this year than it was when we we
Some of you will have already heard that we didn't make it into
GSoC 2021. Every year Google receives over 500 organization
applications, but they can only accept ~200. I have no insights
into their decision process, but I do believe our application was
stronger this year than it was when we we
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1040, "Copying,
Moving, and Forwarding", is now underway. Please discuss the DIP
(its merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.) in the
Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques on the
content of the DIP: what to change, how
On Thursday, 4 March 2021 at 23:42:58 UTC, Dukc wrote:
I don't understand this part. If an assert was failing, the
program is going to terminate anyway, so
InvalidMemoryOperationError is no problem. Well, it might
obfuscate the underlying error if there is no stack trace, but
banning `asser
This post is 3+ years overdue. I initially put it off for the
lack of a purpose-built tool in the language or the library to
distinguish between normal destruction and finalization (when the
GC is invoked by the destructor). After we got the
`GC.inFinalizer` thing and having made a few stalled
On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 19:28:43 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Friday, 19 February 2021 at 08:28:01 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
GitHub:
https://github.com/BindBC/bindbc-lua/releases/tag/0.4.0
The link doesn't work because the tag lacks a 'v', should be:
https://github.com/BindBC/bindbc-lua/relea
The second round of Community Review for DIP 1036, "String
Interpolation Tuple Literals", is now underway. Please discuss
the DIP (its merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.)
in the Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques
on the content of the DIP: what to change,
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 04:31:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
Would you like to know more?
http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2021_02_15.html
It's on /r/programming here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lnhuts/anonymous_classes_in_d/
In the latest release of binbc-lua, I've added support for Lua
5.4.
In recognition of the upcoming named argument support, I've
decided to add parameter names to all of the C API function
declarations in the BindBC packages. bindbc-lua 0.4.0 now has
them, even for the function pointers in the
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 07:07:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Congratulations to Dennis Korpel for a job well done, and
thanks to everyone who provided feedback on this DIP from the
Draft Review through to the Final Review.
And here's the link:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/
When I emailed Walter and Atila to officially launch the Formal
Assessment of DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", I expected
it would be three or four weeks before I received their final
decision. So I was surprised when Walter replied two days later
with the following response:
"Accepted
On Sunday, 14 February 2021 at 00:54:41 UTC, superbomba wrote:
On Saturday, 13 February 2021 at 20:48:53 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
...
Is it possible to rebroadcast live with YT for those who can't
access the original site or app?
What would be the point of that? You'd be unable to
The final Milestone for SAOC 2020 Ended on January 15. The two
remaining students, Robert Aron and Adela Vais, had until the end
of the month to submit their final reports. They did so, and the
reports are now in the hands of the SAOC Committee, which this
year consists of Atila Neves, John Col
The Final Review for DIP 1038, "@nodiscard", has begun.
The Final Review is the last check to make sure everything is in
good shape. Generally, we aren't looking for major revisions to
the DIP unless someone notices something critical. This is a
chance for any revisions made in the previous re
After a bit of delay, DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", is
now in the hands of Walter and Atila for the Formal Assessment.
We can expect to have a final decision or some other result by
March 4.
You can find the final draft of DIP 1034 here:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/1eb2f39bd5
On Wednesday, 27 January 2021 at 11:14:13 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Corrected links:
Thanks. I had too many tabs open.
The second round of Community Review for DIP 1036, "String
Interpolation Tuple Literals", is now under way. Please discuss
the DIP (its merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.)
in the Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques
on the content of the DIP: what to change
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 09:49:10 UTC, M.M. wrote:
Is this (and the related PR people) a short-term initiative, or
is the funding secured for a longer period?
As far as I know this is long term.
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 13:08:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 09:32:06 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
(Also, general question:
Will the PR guys and Max be on Discord or Slack or will it be
too much for them?)
That's up to them, but I guess Max probably will be.
I
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 09:32:06 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
(Also, general question:
Will the PR guys and Max be on Discord or Slack or will it be
too much for them?)
That's up to them, but I guess Max probably will be.
Thanks once more to Symmetry Investments, we have a new paid
staffer in the D Language Foundation family.
Though I call him my "assistant", I can already see he will be
more than that. He'll be taking some things off my shoulders,
sure, but he also has ideas of his own to bring into the mix.
I'm very, very happy that I can finally announce the news. Some
of you may recall the job announcements I put out on the blog
back in September [1]. Symmetry Investments offered to fund one
full-time, or two part-time, Pull Request Manager positions, the
goal being to improve the efficiency of
On Saturday, 2 January 2021 at 20:15:16 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.095.0, ♥ to the 61 contributors.
This release comes with a much improved C++ header generation,
template instantiation traces for deprecations, module-level
function conflict detection, and better compiler fl
On Thursday, 7 January 2021 at 21:26:28 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Should this be on the announce forum?
No it shouldn't. But by the time I realized it was, the
discussion was well underway.
On Thursday, 7 January 2021 at 21:42:55 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 09:21:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/c06ce7f144b3dabf363d1896ddcd31a2a6b7c969/DIPs/DIP1039.md
A bit off topic: Would Kenji Hara still have been an active
Dlang commun
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1039, "Static Arrays
with Inferred Length", is now under way. Please discuss the DIP
(its merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.) in the
Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques on the
content of the DIP: what to change,
This is the discussion thread for the first round of Community
Review of DIP 1039, "Static Arrays with Inferred Length":
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/c06ce7f144b3dabf363d1896ddcd31a2a6b7c969/DIPs/DIP1039.md
The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET on January 20, or when
I make a post de
On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 09:21:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
However, if you have any specific feedback on how to improve
the proposal itself, then please post it in the feedback
thread. The feedback thread will be the source for the review
summary that I will write at the end of this re
The Final Review of DIP 1033, "Implicit Conversion of Expressions
to Delegates", wrapped up early this month. At the time, after a
discussion about the DIP with Atila, Walter asked me to delay the
Formal Assessment. More recently, he has informed me that he
needs to give some thought as to how
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 13:04:42 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
You have a valid point, but still I am sure the facebook group
is a net positive for the community. I'd see it as a digital
version of a local user group.
Yeah, I see no problem with the group existing. I think it's
gr
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 00:38:40 UTC, Murilo wrote:
And apart from all that, having an official FB group serves to
show Dlang is growing strong and proud, it shows the world that
Dlang is not dead(most people think it is).
I'm happy it's working for you, but please do not present
On Sunday, 20 December 2020 at 11:39:14 UTC, Selim Ozel wrote:
On Saturday, 19 December 2020 at 17:48:37 UTC, Ethan wrote:
On Saturday, 19 December 2020 at 15:15:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
I've started up a meeting for people to come and go as they
please.
BEERCONF
Did I miss this? That suc
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1038, "@nodiscard",
is now under way. Please discuss the DIP (its merits, its
implementation, peripheral topics, etc.) in the Discussion Thread
and save all review feedback (critiques on the content of the
DIP: what to change, how to improve it, etc.)
On Monday, 7 December 2020 at 10:29:24 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
After a brief respite, I've gotten back to work. I've just
updated the DConf Online site with links to all the slides
(including Mathis Beer's) and prerecorded videos.
https://dconf.org/2020/online/index.html
After a brief respite, I've gotten back to work. I've just
updated the DConf Online site with links to all the slides
(including Mathis Beer's) and prerecorded videos.
In the coming days, I'll add the slide links to the video
descriptions on YouTube and chop up the Q & A livestreams into
indi
On Monday, 7 December 2020 at 08:35:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
So one more time for 2020, grab your best-loved beverages and
revered D topics, and join us December 19-20th to celebrate all
that we've collectively achieved this year, before finally
banishing 2020 into history's dustbin (and sa
On Wednesday, 25 November 2020 at 20:30:39 UTC, oddp wrote:
On 25.11.20 21:00, Faux Amis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Is there any way to watch the livestreams in stead of the
presentations only?
Well, the youtube channel has these two Q&A livestreams, each
around six hours long, along w
On Monday, 23 November 2020 at 07:39:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Thanks go out to all the people who helped out by asking
questions that made the chats interesting and informative.
Special thanks go out to our speakers who provided the
technical presentations:
Seconded. The presentations
I've written up a blog post describing how to take part in DConf
Online 2020. If anything isn't clear, let me know.
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/11/20/dconf-online-2020-how-to-participate/
In the course of scheduling the video premieres on our YouTube
channel, I learned that YouTube only offers time options on the
hour and every quarter hour after. Since a few of the talks were
listed on the website schedule as starting at :10, :20, or :40,
I've had to adjust them 5-minutes back
The Final Review for DIP 1033, "Implicit Conversion of
Expressions to Delegates", has begun.
The purpose of the Final Review is a last check to make sure
everything is in good shape. Generally, we aren't looking for
major revisions to the DIP unless someone notices something
critical. This is
On Monday, 16 November 2020 at 06:27:48 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
moved from 19:20 UTC on Sunday to 15:20 UTC on Saturday.
Sorry, that should be 17:20 UTC on Saturday.
Now that we know exactly how long the talks are, we found the
need to fill some dead space for a video shorter than expected
and reclaim some extra post-talk Q & A space for a video that
turned out longer than expected. So we shuffled the schedule
around a bit to make it happen.
The biggest c
Recently, Google put out an announcement on the GSoC mailing list
about their plans for GSoC 2021. They're doing things differently
this time.
A big change is that the event is being cut down to 10 weeks,
with 2 evaluations rather than 3. That means we will need to
think of project ideas that
On Thursday, 12 November 2020 at 17:01:51 UTC, Greatsam4sure
wrote:
On Thursday, 12 November 2020 at 08:34:46 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 November 2020 at 12:33:44 UTC, Greatsam4sure
wrote:
Is Andrei not having anything for the community in this dlang
online conference?
All the
On Wednesday, 11 November 2020 at 12:33:44 UTC, Greatsam4sure
wrote:
Is Andrei not having anything for the community in this dlang
online conference?
All the talks are in the published schedule.
On the first day of the conference, we've swapped Robert and
Ali's timeslots. Ali's talk is now at 15:20 UTC and Robert's is
at 16:40.
https://dconf.org/2020/online/index.html
On Monday, 2 November 2020 at 18:23:35 UTC, Seb wrote:
I'm sorry about the rather aggressive tone.
Thank you.
On Monday, 2 November 2020 at 15:08:43 UTC, Seb wrote:
A worrying side note here is that there have been many private
and public mails about the root causes (three years ago the
registry was crashing because the VM only had 200M of memory
and a small GC leak made the server collect slightly
We've added a "lightning talk" to the DConf Online 2020 schedule.
Alexandru Militaru, whom you may remember from his DConf 2019
presentation, will give a ~15-minute talk about sil-cling, an
extension to the Symmetry Integration Language (SIL). The talk is
taking the 19:20 UTC slot on November 2
I've finally gotten around to finishing up the port of
DerelictSFML2 to BindBC:
http://bindbc-sfml.dub.pm/
Unlike the Derelict package, it supports every release of CSFML
from 2.0 to 2.5. It's untested beyond compiling and loading, so I
appreciate any bug reports anyone files.
One issue I e
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 12:16:00 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2020 at 12:41:34 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
The DConf Online schedule is now live on the website. I've got
a blog post coming tomorrow which will, among other things,
include an announcement about the schedule aime
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1037, "Add Unary
Operator ...", is now under way. Please discuss the DIP (its
merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.) in the
Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques on the
content of the DIP: what to change, how to impro
On Wednesday, 14 October 2020 at 12:41:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I've got a blog post coming tomorrow
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/10/15/d-2-094-0-dconf-online-schedule-and-saoc-2020/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/jbp7j6/d_2094_released/
On Wednesday, 14 October 2020 at 14:07:39 UTC, Ezneh wrote:
I found few typos in the following parts of the text:
Thanks!
The DConf Online schedule is now live on the website. I've got a
blog post coming tomorrow which will, among other things, include
an announcement about the schedule aimed at the world outside our
community in a form suitable for /r/programming.
https://dconf.org/2020/online/index.html
On Saturday, 3 October 2020 at 23:37:37 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 3 October 2020 at 23:15:41 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/3/20 4:12 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
What's the hashtag? #dconf2020 ?
Me not know hashtag but Mike has been saying that this is not
a DConf but a "DConf Online"
On Saturday, 3 October 2020 at 23:15:41 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/3/20 4:12 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
What's the hashtag? #dconf2020 ?
Me not know hashtag but Mike has been saying that this is not a
DConf but a "DConf Online". Two different yearly events... :)
Ali
#dconf2020 works.
On Saturday, 3 October 2020 at 04:31:35 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Did you remember the schelude publication? It was supposed to
happen yesterday.
Yes. I'm behind schedule, but it's coming soon.
Jean-Louis Leroy sent in a blog post prompted by Andrei's
"Perfect forwarding" challenge from the July #beerconf. He digs
into D's metaprogramming and code generation facilities, and
shows how he arrived at his "refraction" module.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/09/28/function-generatio
301 - 400 of 1109 matches
Mail list logo
