On Sunday, 23 October 2016 at 05:34:08 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 02:59:15 UTC, Dsby wrote:
On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 03:26:31 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the
On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 02:59:15 UTC, Dsby wrote:
On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 03:26:31 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for
that. While my work on the precise GC
On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 03:26:31 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for
that. While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it
is closer than it was to be
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for
that. While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it
is closer than it was to be getting merged.
[...]
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 02:15:30 UTC, Dsby wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for
that. While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it
is closer than it was to be
On Saturday, 3 September 2016 at 12:22:25 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 14:55:26 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Anyway, with @safe unions, my thinking is that it would mean
that the garbage collector can be made precise in @safe code
in a way that it can't in @system code (assuming
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 14:56:15 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
GC (and runtime in general) has no idea what code is safe and
what code is system. GC works with data at run-time. All
@safe-related stuff is about code (not data!) and happens at
compile-time. They are completely orthogonal and
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for
that. While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it
is closer than it was to be getting merged.
[...]
In Mac 32 bit. the test is not pass.
On Saturday, 3 September 2016 at 12:22:25 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
GC (and runtime in general) has no idea what code is safe and
what code is system. GC works with data at run-time. All
@safe-related stuff is about code (not data!) and happens at
compile-time. They are completely orthogonal and
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 14:55:26 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Anyway, with @safe unions, my thinking is that it would mean
that the garbage collector can be made precise in @safe code in
a way that it can't in @system code (assuming unions with
pointers aren't snuck in through @trusted).
GC
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 08:14:33 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
Can we rather just make a special tagged union that is
scanned... rather avoid trying to make something that should be
minimal more and more complex? The compiler already treats some
parts of phobos as "special" as far as I
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Through the work I did and the research of a couple of GC
topics, I discovered that I really enjoyed working on the
garbage collector and I plan on continuing that. I was recently
accepted to the University of Washington's
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> [snip]. Precisely scanning unions is tricky since they could mix pointer
> and non pointer types. [snip]
>
Can we rather just make a special tagged union that is scanned...
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 06:54:57 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 09/01/2016 08:25 PM, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
> I will still continue working on it in the hopes it'll get in.
Great news! :)
> I
> discovered that I really enjoyed working on the garbage
collector
If that's not motivation
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 05:19:57 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for
that. While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it
is closer than it was to be
On 09/01/2016 08:25 PM, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
> I will still continue working on it in the hopes it'll get in.
Great news! :)
> I
> discovered that I really enjoyed working on the garbage collector
If that's not motivation enough...
> I was recently accepted to the University of Washington's
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for
that. While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it
is closer than it was to be getting merged.
My open PR for the actual inclusion of the
On 02/09/2016 3:25 PM, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for that. While
my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it is closer than it was
to be getting merged.
My open PR for the actual inclusion of the precise GC is here:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for
that. While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it
is closer than it was to be getting merged.
[...]
wait for merge
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for that.
While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it is
closer than it was to be getting merged.
My open PR for the actual inclusion of the precise GC is here:
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1603
Even
20 matches
Mail list logo
