On Tuesday, 30 April 2019 at 13:44:00 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
Now, for the abomination that is
callMemberFunctionWithParamsStruct!(t, "f")(combined)... It's
just t.f(combined.tupleof) in a bad disguise, and I really
can't see the benefit.
If you are doing function parameters, there are two k
On Tuesday, 30 April 2019 at 13:10:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 April 2019 at 08:20:29 UTC, JN wrote:
It might be nifty by D standards, but for a person not
familiar with D
Or, as someone familiar with D, I wonder why not just use a
plain struct. D allows you to set initial val
On Tuesday, 30 April 2019 at 08:20:29 UTC, JN wrote:
It might be nifty by D standards, but for a person not familiar
with D
Or, as someone familiar with D, I wonder why not just use a plain
struct. D allows you to set initial values for struct members
plainly.
To be frank, I haven't been im
On Monday, 29 April 2019 at 13:08:59 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Victor Porton shows how he uses string mixins to generate
structs with Nullable fields at compile time to help him pass
arbitrary subsets of explicit and default arguments to
functions in D.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2019/04/
Victor Porton shows how he uses string mixins to generate structs
with Nullable fields at compile time to help him pass arbitrary
subsets of explicit and default arguments to functions in D.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2019/04/29/flexible-default-function-parameters/
Reddit:
https://www.r