On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 16:50:20 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Is there a non-breaking way to do it that would increase the
amount of flexibility while keeping the current behavior as a
default? For instance, the equivalent of using
std.experimental.allocator so that a user could switch between
the
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 16:16:03 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 07:02:19 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
Breaking, you mean the standard library? or including user
codebases?
Taking the GC out of language constructs (e.g. ~=, AAs) would
be a massive breaking change and
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 07:02:19 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
Breaking, you mean the standard library? or including user
codebases?
Taking the GC out of language constructs (e.g. ~=, AAs) would be
a massive breaking change and would probably break the majority
of D code in existence.
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 07:02:19 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 04:49:34 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 04:17:21 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 04:49:34 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 04:17:21 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 04:17:21 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54xnbg/herb_sutters_experimental_deferred_and_unordered/
Ali
Is it possible to have something similar as in library
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54xnbg/herb_sutters_experimental_deferred_and_unordered/
Ali
Is it possible to have something similar as in library rather
than GC in core language construct?
On Friday, 7 October 2016 at 21:21:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 30 September 2016 at 14:12:30 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
[...]
The paragraph I like the most there is: "The other important
difference is that
On Friday, 30 September 2016 at 14:12:30 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54xnbg/herb_sutters_experimental_deferred_and_unordered/
Ali
The paragraph I like the most there is: "The other
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54xnbg/herb_sutters_experimental_deferred_and_unordered/
Ali
The paragraph I like the most there is: "The other important
difference is that deferred_heap meets C++'s
On Friday, 30 September 2016 at 03:42:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
GC is unnacceptable !
Ho ! a deferred and unordered destruction library, really cool !
Is there intelligent life in the C++ world ?
I think the difference is that the solution is scoped to only
those objects that you chose to
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54xnbg/herb_sutters_experimental_deferred_and_unordered/
Ali
GC is unnacceptable !
Ho ! a deferred and unordered destruction library, really cool !
Is there intelligent life in
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 13:50 -0700, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54xnbg/herb_sutters_exp
> erimental_deferred_and_unordered/
>
And the comments in the thread confirm why Reddit is a massive waste of
time and resources. It should be
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54xnbg/herb_sutters_experimental_deferred_and_unordered/
Ali
14 matches
Mail list logo
