Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-26 Thread Mattcoder via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:28:26 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) Don't forget hackernews!

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-26 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 13:41:42 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54kg6v/numeric_age_for_d_mir_glas_is_faster_than/ Thank you! Do you think the link should be announced in the news group? --Ilya We usually post them in the threads where their

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-26 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 13:30:31 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 13:01:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 13:10:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 11:54:46 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mike, please use for

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-26 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 13:01:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 13:10:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 11:54:46 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mike, please use for Monday the link to blog post instead of the forum post. Thank you

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-26 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 13:10:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 11:54:46 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mike, please use for Monday the link to blog post instead of the forum post. Thank you Absolutely.

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-26 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 12:05:46 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: [...] Sounds great! During my time studying mathematics - in the last century, one Dr. of the mathematical department has developed a C++ library as

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-26 Thread Martin Tschierschke via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Mir v0.18.0 release notes:

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-25 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 11:54:46 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mike, please use for Monday the link to blog post instead of the forum post. Thank you Absolutely.

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-25 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 12:11:53 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark:

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-25 Thread Lodovico Giaretta via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 12:11:53 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark:

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-25 Thread Lodovico Giaretta via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Mir v0.18.0 release notes:

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-25 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:13:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 12:59:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) I will; better yet let

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-25 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 20:53:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 09/24/2016 04:37 PM, Martin Nowak wrote: [...] Yes, this is important. Added Also, I'm not sure whether the title of this thread is intended to be the title of the blog. In that case, "Numerical age" ->

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-25 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 20:53:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 09/24/2016 04:37 PM, Martin Nowak wrote: [...] Yes, this is important. Added Also, I'm not sure whether the title of this thread is intended to be the title of the blog. In that case, "Numerical age" ->

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 09/24/2016 04:37 PM, Martin Nowak wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Still time for a few edits of that post?

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobak...@forum.dlang.org Working on it in an hour,

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 17:42:10 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 17:42:10 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobak...@forum.dlang.org Working on it in an hour,

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobak...@forum.dlang.org Working on it in an hour, with such a strong headline we should avoid mistakes.

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:13:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 12:59:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) I will; better yet let

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 12:59:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) I will; better yet let Mike do it (cc'd). Don't forget: 9 AM New York Time is the optimum.

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) I will; better yet let Mike do it (cc'd). Don't forget: 9 AM New York Time is the optimum. -- Andrei

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 9/23/2016 7:30 AM, Joakim wrote: People don't just want speed and portability, they want ease of use. Show them that D will be easier. Fast code, fast!

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 09/23/2016 02:14 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 09/23/2016 06:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) Shall we wait until Monday morning so that you have time to update the blog and it has more impact on Reddit? :) Yah

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 18:14:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 09/23/2016 06:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) Shall we wait until Monday morning so that you have time to update the blog and it has more impact

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 09/23/2016 06:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) Shall we wait until Monday morning so that you have time to update the blog and it has more impact on Reddit? :) Ali

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 16:48:33 UTC, kinke wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 15:01:28 UTC, jmh530 wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Great

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 15:01:28 UTC, jmh530 wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Great work. +1. Please also provide the used compilers for

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Great work.

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 14:55:02 UTC, John Colvin wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark:

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Mir v0.18.0 release notes:

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Mir v0.18.0 release notes:

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:31:35 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Nice but you should explain how to reproduce the results,

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Nice but you should explain how to reproduce the results, if only to give more credit to the post.

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?)

Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-23 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Mir v0.18.0 release notes: https://github.com/libmir/mir/releases/tag/v0.18.0 The release includes Mir's D