Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-24 Thread Rob McGinley
On Monday, 4 November 2013 at 18:22:03 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 11/04/2013 09:45 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote: do you have the book on GitHub or some such site where we can submit change requests to the text? This would be the best place: http://code.google.com/p/ddili/issues/list

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-04 Thread Ali Çehreli
On 11/03/2013 11:06 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: Any chance of you providing a limited edition printed version? Perhaps with the authors name missing from the cover? :D Ha ha! :) Maybe the name should appear randomly on the web site. Seriously, I am thinking about a printed version, likely

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-04 Thread Rory McGuire
On 4 Nov 2013 19:45, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote: On 11/03/2013 11:06 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: Any chance of you providing a limited edition printed version? Perhaps with the authors name missing from the cover? :D Ha ha! :) Maybe the name should appear randomly on the web site.

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-03 Thread Jordi Sayol
On 03/11/13 02:30, Kelet wrote: On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 00:03:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: I have continued with the translation of the book. There are 36 of the 727 pages still to be translated. (However, I still need to write the UDA chapter.) In addition to many corrections and

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-03 Thread John J
On 11/01/2013 08:03 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote: I have continued with the translation of the book. There are 36 of the 727 pages still to be translated. (However, I still need to write the UDA chapter.) In addition to many corrections and additions throughout the book, there are the following

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-03 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 22:45:13 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: I spent considerable amount of time on those names. Like you, I am not happy with Inverse. :) I wanted to say struct Negate and function negate(). But ! is the negation operator. I like opposite better but the Wikipedia

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-03 Thread Tove
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 21:21:04 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 22:45:13 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: I spent considerable amount of time on those names. Like you, I am not happy with Inverse. :) I'm not a native English speaker, but FWIW I would have

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-03 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 22:42:37 UTC, Tove wrote: I'm not a native English speaker, but FWIW I would have chosen: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/numeric_complement I knew there was another term out there somewhere :-)

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-03 Thread Ali Çehreli
On 11/03/2013 03:19 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 22:42:37 UTC, Tove wrote: I'm not a native English speaker, but FWIW I would have chosen: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/numeric_complement I knew there was another term out there somewhere :-) Thanks all,

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-03 Thread Rory McGuire
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks all, I've settled with the pedantically incorrect Negative and negative() but I added a note saying that it is more accurate to say numeric complement: :) That is the name I was secretly voting for. Any chance of

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-02 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 00:03:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: I have continued with the translation of the book. There are 36 of the 727 pages still to be translated. (However, I still need to write the UDA chapter.) In addition to many corrections and additions throughout the book, there

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-02 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 11/2/13 1:15 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 00:03:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: I have continued with the translation of the book. There are 36 of the 727 pages still to be translated. (However, I still need to write the UDA chapter.) In addition to many

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-02 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 20:36:39 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Converse? (Haven't read the section discussed.) Could also work. The range in question wraps an input range r and sets front to return -r.front.

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-02 Thread Ali Çehreli
On 11/02/2013 02:25 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 20:36:39 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Converse? (Haven't read the section discussed.) Could also work. The range in question wraps an input range r and sets front to return -r.front. I spent

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-02 Thread Kelet
On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 00:03:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: I have continued with the translation of the book. There are 36 of the 727 pages still to be translated. (However, I still need to write the UDA chapter.) In addition to many corrections and additions throughout the book, there

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-02 Thread CJS
Thanks for all your hard work, Ali. +1 I eagerly await it becoming a great portal for people wanting to learn more about D. And, hopefully, going on to write high quality libraries I can use. :-)

Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-01 Thread Ali Çehreli
I have continued with the translation of the book. There are 36 of the 727 pages still to be translated. (However, I still need to write the UDA chapter.) In addition to many corrections and additions throughout the book, there are the following chapters translated: * Tuples * More

Re: Programming in D book is about 95% translated

2013-11-01 Thread Nicholas Smith
Fantastic, I appreciate your efforts! Your book has been a very useful resource for me.