On 7/6/23 12:16 AM, IchorDev wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 at 21:50:37 UTC, Andrew wrote:
Why not just improve Phobos itself? Make PRs to add new modules to
std.experimental, announce them here and elsewhere on the web, and get
the community to support it.
Earlier in this thread it was
On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 at 21:50:37 UTC, Andrew wrote:
Why not just improve Phobos itself? Make PRs to add new modules
to std.experimental, announce them here and elsewhere on the
web, and get the community to support it.
Earlier in this thread it was pointed out that it's too arbitrary
On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 at 20:03:26 UTC, IchorDev wrote:
Perhaps a fork of Phobos that's more community-driven would be
good for the language?
Why not just improve Phobos itself? Make PRs to add new modules
to std.experimental, announce them here and elsewhere on the web,
and get the
On Saturday, 13 May 2023 at 15:58:12 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
- better enums
- tagged union
- pattern matching
- async
- nullable
- tuple/multiple return (deconstruction)
- allocators (don't do them as classes/interface for the love
of god)
- implement GC as an allocator
This is a nice
On Tuesday, 27 June 2023 at 12:00:48 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Anyway, the main point of this announcement wasn't IVY, it's
that we're finally getting organized. IVY is just the tool
we're using to do it. No D user or contributor needs to pay any
attention to it if they don't want to.
And I
On Tuesday, 27 June 2023 at 11:30:42 UTC, Francesco Mecca wrote:
It would be great if you specify or at least give us a glimpse
of what this "change" is about. Right now, it sounds like
corporate propaganda for Ucora
It's not propaganda. I answered questions about it in BeerConf
last
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
You're going to hear more about IVY as time goes by, and
eventually, we're going to start employing it more broadly in
the community. We now have a better idea of how to more
effectively guide contributors so that they can be more
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Our enthusiasm is high, and we're ready to get going. I think
you'll like where we're headed.
Good job guys!! This reinforces my belief in what you do.
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
You're going to hear more about IVY as time goes by, and
eventually, we're going to start employing it more broadly in
the community. We now have a better idea of how to more
effectively guide contributors so that they can be more
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 23:24:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
This initiative has my full support.
argh!!
On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 16:58:37 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm not exaggerating when I say that this is going to be the
most significant change in the D community in the 20 years
I've been a part of it.
This sounds
On Saturday, 13 May 2023 at 15:58:12 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 11:26:26 UTC, Ogi wrote:
Or it perhaps doesn't need that list and i am wrong in my
analysis, wich is probably the case
On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 11:26:26 UTC, Ogi wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
…
That’s a lot of words but little actual sense. What makes you
think that this IVY™ program is the silver bullet that D
desperately needs? And not just yet another load of crap
On Tuesday, 9 May 2023 at 12:27:30 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
To be honest, this has always been my take as well.
On Tuesday, 9 May 2023 at 15:46:12 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I basically agree with this
I feel if I was understood, only people with (at least) one foot
out the door would
On Sunday, 7 May 2023 at 02:15:02 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
IVY, their organizational development program
Your solution to hearing luas dev saying "I dont manage
anything" and whatever feedback from your survey, is you got
corporate
On Sunday, 7 May 2023 at 02:15:02 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
IVY, their organizational development program
Your solution to hearing luas dev saying "I dont manage
anything" and whatever feedback from your survey, is you got
corporate
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
IVY, their organizational development program
Your solution to hearing luas dev saying "I dont manage anything"
and whatever feedback from your survey, is you got corporate
training and now you gun-ho about management?
Was I in
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Ucora’s long-term vision is [to change the way the world
works](https://ucora.com/). As part of their mission, they
provide organizations with the tools they need to transform the
way they work. [IVY, their organizational
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm not exaggerating when I say that this is going to be the
most significant change in the D community in the 20 years I've
been a part of it. I expect we're going to encounter bumps
along the way, but that's okay. We now have a
On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 11:26:26 UTC, Ogi wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
…
That’s a lot of words but little actual sense. What makes you
think that this IVY™ program is the silver bullet that D
desperately needs? And not just yet another load of crap
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
…
That’s a lot of words but little actual sense. What makes you
think that this IVY™ program is the silver bullet that D
desperately needs? And not just yet another load of crap invented
by some “consulting” firm as a relatively
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
...
Our enthusiasm is high, and we're ready to get going. I think
you'll like where we're headed.
Interesting.
Good luck with the endeavor!
Ivan Kazmenko.
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 23:24:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
This initiative has my full support.
While I have ceased using D because of my concerns about the
project's future (I discussed my reasons in a previous message
that don't need to be repeated), I have continued to check this
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 23:42:37 UTC, max haughton wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 23:17:28 UTC, MissPiggy wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Our enthusiasm is high, and we're ready to get going. I think
you'll like where we're headed.
IVY may
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 23:17:28 UTC, MissPiggy wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Our enthusiasm is high, and we're ready to get going. I think
you'll like where we're headed.
IVY may increase the probability of a particular outcome, but
it cannot
This initiative has my full support.
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Our enthusiasm is high, and we're ready to get going. I think
you'll like where we're headed.
IVY may increase the probability of a particular outcome, but it
cannot predict a particular outcome.
We still can't even predict
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
...
Exciting news!
On 5/3/23 7:13 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
Our enthusiasm is high, and we're ready to get going. I think you'll
like where we're headed.
This all sounds awesome!
-Steve
On 5/3/23 05:08, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:37:31 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
From memory that was merely an AGM at DConf, but sure, I'll take
credit for that (despite knowing next to nothing about management)!
The AGM was your idea, but so were the regular meetings.
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:37:31 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
From memory that was merely an AGM at DConf, but sure, I'll
take credit for that (despite knowing next to nothing about
management)!
The AGM was your idea, but so were the regular meetings. You
pushed it to Ali in 2018. I have
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Yes, there have been improvements over the past few years. The
quarterly DLF meetings with industry representatives, initially
proposed by Nicholas Wilson, have been productive.
From memory that was merely an AGM at DConf, but sure,
Very interesting.
I just want to say, I'm having repeated unrelated CI failures for:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/8699
Yesterday I finally said right stuff this I don't have the energy to
fight the CI on this anymore and asked Razvan to kinda take over as the
changes on my end are
Sounds awesome Mike, really does. As long as transparency remains
a key objective, I think everyone is on board.
34 matches
Mail list logo
