Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sergey Gromov wrote:
Don wrote:
If you could completely ignore keyboard and display issues, and use any
unicode character as an operator, which ones would you actually use?
I'd use dot ⋅ and cross × products for 3D, union ∪ and
intersection ∩, subset ⊂ and superset
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* There is a way of specifying that precedence of a function defined as
above is the same as precedence of a built-in operator.
That throws out the ability to parse without semantic analysis. It's not
worth it.
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* There is a way of specifying that precedence of a function defined
as above is the same as precedence of a built-in operator.
That throws out the ability to parse without semantic analysis. It's not
worth it.
It doesn't per a previous post
Don wrote:
If you could completely ignore keyboard and display issues, and use any
unicode character as an operator, which ones would you actually use?
I'd use dot ⋅ and cross × products for 3D, union ∪ and
intersection ∩, subset ⊂ and superset ⊃ and their negative forms.
I don't think I'd use
Sergey Gromov:
I'd use dot â
and cross à products for 3D, union ⪠and
intersection â©, subset â and superset â and their negative forms.
I don't think I'd use anything else.
I just want to note that the whole thread is almost unreadable on the
digitalmars.com/webnews/, because it
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sergey Gromov wrote:
Don wrote:
If you could completely ignore keyboard and display issues, and use any
unicode character as an operator, which ones would you actually use?
I'd use dot ⋅ and cross × products for
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Yigal Chripun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
(like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
DOS console
Bill Baxter пишет:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Benji Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Benji Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
Anyone using a shell for Windows that works and supports UTF-8
properly?
A regular Windows
KennyTM~ wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
As an example, while I'd enjoy seeing code like this, I'm not sure
I'd enjoy writing it (Note that I am prone to exaggerations):
int a = ∅; //empty set, same as = void
int[] b = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
a = readInt();
Hum, interesting
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Spacen Jasset wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Spacen Jasset wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:41:26 +0100, Bill Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same thing goes for downs' in-fix operators. I think his syntax is
/infix/ which means that his ops always have the same precedence as
division.
I'm guessing this Python Cookbook recipe is very similar to Downs'
technique.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the precedence of your user-defined in-fix operator?
--bb
Yup, I realized this myself as well. Seemed like such a great idea when I
only thought of it for three seconds. :p
An operator could always be
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the precedence of your user-defined in-fix operator?
--bb
Yup, I realized this myself as
Bill Baxter:
was actually more work than it would be to just use D for everything.
Mixing languages isn't nice, I agree. That's why I too use D for several
purposes.
But if you have to change your code very often (and if your problems are of a
certain kind that allow a natural vectorization),
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:28:51 +0200, Bruno Medeiros
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
Andrei
I'm unsure
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
As an example, while I'd enjoy seeing code like this, I'm not sure I'd
enjoy writing it (Note that I am prone to exaggerations):
int a = ∅; //empty set, same as = void
int[] b = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
a = readInt();
Hum, interesting example, it
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
(like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
DOS console in Windows
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:27:58 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
Andrei
I'm already having problems with unicode: the
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
(My comment cross posted here from
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Few random thoughts on the subject:
- Someday probably programming languages will use some Unicode symbols. I don't
know if Fortress will succeed, but I think someday some language will do.
Probably Unicode symbols will be used as in Fotress, for improve the
readability of
在 Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:42:32 +0800，Andrei Alexandrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写道:
Correx:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rmc/allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
Max Samukha wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:23:29 -0700, Robert Fraser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bearophile wrote:
- Python3 allows Unicode identifiers, mostly to allow people in
all part of the world to write variable names in their languages.
So does D.
I'd like to note that identifiers
I always use English for variable names, instead of my language, because I've
had my share of debugging code with variables in other languages and it's not a
nice thing to do.
Regarding Python code, its std libs keeps identifiers in English only, but when
they have invented the
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:33:16 -0400, bearophile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always use English for variable names, instead of my language, because I've
had my share of debugging code with variables in other languages and it's not
a nice thing to do.
Regarding Python code, its std libs keeps
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:37:43 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:27:58 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/
allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:52:34 +0900, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/
allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
27 matches
Mail list logo
