Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Joakim writes: > On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 00:11:34 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: >> On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 23:11:06 UTC, Joakim wrote: >>> That sounds like this issue I ran into with ARM EH: >>> >>>

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Joakim writes: > On Monday, 4 January 2016 at 09:26:39 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: >> Joakim writes: >> >>> On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 00:11:34 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: [...] >>> >>> Sounds good, submit a PR and let's get it in. >> >> Was planning to

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Joakim writes: > On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 00:11:34 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: >> On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 23:11:06 UTC, Joakim wrote: >>> That sounds like this issue I ran into with ARM EH: >>> >>>

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On Monday, 4 January 2016 at 09:26:39 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: Joakim writes: On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 00:11:34 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: [...] Sounds good, submit a PR and let's get it in. Was planning to get that PR going then got side tracked by a more difficult

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Joakim writes: > On Monday, 4 January 2016 at 09:26:39 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: >> Joakim writes: > >> The bug is a bad stack pointer which blows up when the last unittest >> returns. This unittest has all the right conditions to generate >> stack

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 20:55:44 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: I'm going to start with Plan B.1 though because LLVM does nice optimizations for TLS. What is Plan B.1? -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 10:10:20 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 20:55:44 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: I'm going to start with Plan B.1 though because LLVM does nice optimizations for TLS. What is Plan B.1? -- /Jacob Carlborg Getting it into llvm:

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Jacob Carlborg writes: > On 2015-12-30 08:02, Dan Olson wrote: > >> I know some of it from hacking dyld for iOS, but not all. How does this >> fit in with "Plan B.2"? > > If you need to figure out how TLS works, I can give you some help, > that's all I'm saying :) Oh, good.

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 23:11:06 UTC, Joakim wrote: That sounds like this issue I ran into with ARM EH: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/489#issuecomment-143560075 I was able to work around it by disabling the mentioned llvm optimization pass:

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 00:11:34 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 23:11:06 UTC, Joakim wrote: That sounds like this issue I ran into with ARM EH: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/489#issuecomment-143560075 I was able to work around it by disabling

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 21:56:46 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: Dan Olson writes: A little progress report. More to come later when I get something pushed to github. I bought a returned Apple Watch yesterday at discount for $223.99 US and tried to see how much of D

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On 2015-12-30 08:02, Dan Olson wrote: I know some of it from hacking dyld for iOS, but not all. How does this fit in with "Plan B.2"? If you need to figure out how TLS works, I can give you some help, that's all I'm saying :) -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Jacob Carlborg writes: > On 2015-12-28 20:02, Dan Olson wrote: > >> That is Plan B.2 > > I'm working on implementing native TLS for OS X in DMD. I think I've > figured out how everything works. Unless you already know how it > works, I could tell you what I have figured out. I know

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On 2015-12-28 20:02, Dan Olson wrote: That is Plan B.2 I'm working on implementing native TLS for OS X in DMD. I think I've figured out how everything works. Unless you already know how it works, I could tell you what I have figured out. -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Joakim writes: > > I don't understand how the bitcode requirement works on your own > device: I thought that was for an Apple-submitted app that they then > compiled to binary themselves? Do you have to go through the same > process even for test apps, ie no sideloading? Or

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On 2015-12-28 09:45, Dan Olson wrote: On implication of Apple requiring bitcode: if Apple is compiling the bitcode with their clang or llc, then it means using a modifed LLVM like I do to support thread-locals on watchOS, tvOS, or iOS is only good for side loading. Probably going to have to

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Jacob Carlborg writes: > > Would it be possible to bypass LLVM and do the thread local specific > parts in LDC? That is Plan B.2

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Joakim writes: > > Thanks for the detailed answer; I'm sure this will now become the > definitive answer online. I've gone googling for technical info only > to sometimes be directed back to a post in these D forums. :) Me too! Its very funny when that happens. > Time to

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 01:17:15 UTC, Dan Olson wrote: A little progress report. More to come later when I get something pushed to github. I bought a returned Apple Watch yesterday at discount for $223.99 US and tried to see how much of D would work on it using my iOS fork of LDC.