On Monday, 7 December 2020 at 12:13:35 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
[...]
Very practical features, similar to trailing closures, are
expected.
Implementing the DIP is added to the list of possible gsoc21
projects. Hopefully D is
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
During the assessment, Walter and Atila had a discussion
regarding this particular criticism:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:59:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1030.md
Fantastic news.
The fact that it is a
On Wednesday, 28 October 2020 at 02:22:14 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
On Thursday, 8 October 2020 at 14:05:14 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
[...]
Good catch. The DIP doesn't mention opDispatch and it's
probably too late to change. I also don't really see a
non-breaking way to tell opDispatch about
On Thursday, 8 October 2020 at 14:05:14 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
how to this new feature interact with opDispatch? Will there be
any possibility to extract the argument names in opDispatch?
Good catch. The DIP doesn't mention opDispatch and it's probably
too late to change. I also don't really
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
During the assessment, Walter and Atila had a discussion
regarding this particular criticism:
On 9/23/2020 7:01 AM, Arun wrote:
How does the compiler handle function lookup when there is an ambiguous match,
but the ambiguous function is in a different module?
What would be the solution?
The same way it handles it without named arguments - an error.
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
...
Mike, thanks for pulling this together. This question from the
feedback thread is still unanswered.
How does the compiler handle function lookup when there is an
ambiguous
On Monday, 21 September 2020 at 09:07:39 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:59:05 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:59:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1030.md
I am happy with that, too. So what is the
On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 13:39:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's from a phone call they had while they were discussing
whether to approve or reject the DIP.
LOL no wonder I couldn't find it.
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
Good. It has some weaknesses that Rikki's DIP would have avoided
but it's also simpler. Good work, Walter!
"Named arguments breaks this very important pattern:
auto
On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 13:34:30 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
So they decided that a new `std.traits` template and a
corresponding `__traits` option are needed which expand into
the exact function signature of another
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
So they decided that a new `std.traits` template and a
corresponding `__traits` option are needed which expand into
the exact function signature of another function.
I have been trying to locate that specific discussion,
On 9/17/2020 6:42 AM, Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
That being said, does the new feature imply any change in the *parameters*
themselves?
No.
I.e. are there changes in the way the function is defined,
No.
not only in the way it is called?
It only affects calling syntax in providing an
On 9/17/20 8:58 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
So they decided that a new `std.traits` template and a corresponding
`__traits` option are needed which expand into the exact function
signature of another function.
This, sounds great. I'd love to see the specifics for this.
Also, I am very much
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
During the assessment, Walter and Atila had a discussion
regarding this particular criticism:
[...]
Calls for celebration... who's in?
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
I would really want to see tuples ...
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:45:16 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:42:47 UTC, Jean-Louis
Leroy wrote:
this point I have some hope that the DIP is not damaging in
the way Mike thinks.
What Mike thinks appears nowhere in my post :-)
OK, s/thinks/reports/
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:42:47 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy
wrote:
this point I have some hope that the DIP is not damaging in the
way Mike thinks.
What Mike thinks appears nowhere in my post :-)
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:23:38 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy
wrote:
Actually, Parameters!origFun will carry storage classes, UDAs,
etc for all the parameters. And Parameters!origFun[0..1] (note
the two dots) will carry everything about the first parameter.
The trouble begins when, for some
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
During the assessment, Walter and Atila had a discussion
regarding this particular criticism:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:59:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1030.md
YES, YES, YES, I had argue in favor of
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1030.md
24 matches
Mail list logo
