Re: LDC 1.19.0

2019-12-26 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 26 December 2019 at 12:41:14 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Friday, 20 December 2019 at 18:30:37 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: LLVM upgraded to v9.0.1, incl. experimental AVR backend. Is that an upstream release? I don't see a 9.0.1 in the LDC LLVM fork:

Re: LDC 1.19.0

2019-12-26 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 20 December 2019 at 18:30:37 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: LLVM upgraded to v9.0.1, incl. experimental AVR backend. Is that an upstream release? I don't see a 9.0.1 in the LDC LLVM fork: https://github.com/ldc-developers/llvm/releases

Re: LDC 1.19.0

2019-12-20 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 03:19:43PM +, kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > Glad to announce LDC 1.19: Awesome!! With every release, LDC is becoming more and more my go-to D compiler. Big thanks to all involved in making this happen! T -- A linguistics professor was lecturing to

Re: LDC 1.19.0-beta2

2019-12-02 Thread kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 1 December 2019 at 19:11:53 UTC, Dennis wrote: I have Visual Studio installed. How do I know which import libraries are being used? Then you're most likely NOT using the MS toolchain, since it has to be explicitly enabled (see README.txt). - It can be verified by checking the DLL

Re: LDC 1.19.0-beta2

2019-12-01 Thread Dennis via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 29 November 2019 at 20:55:10 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce the second beta for LDC 1.19. Thanks! with significant import library additions and changes. So if you target Windows and don't use the Microsoft toolchain, please participate in testing to prevent regressions for

Re: LDC 1.19.0-beta1

2019-11-09 Thread kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 07:57:02 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote: I mean you can waiting for dmd 2.089.1 to release ldc 1.9.0 : ) That's the plan anyway; plus this druntime regression most likely doesn't apply to LDC (atomics are highly compiler-specific). To catch regressions like this

Re: LDC 1.19.0-beta1

2019-11-09 Thread zoujiaqing via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 8 November 2019 at 13:36:27 UTC, kinke wrote: Please file a druntime issue, this is DMD. Yes. I mean you can waiting for dmd 2.089.1 to release ldc 1.9.0 : ) Thanks.

Re: LDC 1.19.0-beta1

2019-11-08 Thread kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 8 November 2019 at 02:56:31 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote: 2.089.0 have bug .. building hunt library error: /home/travis/dlang/dmd-2.089.0/linux/bin64/../../src/druntime/import/core/atomic.d(293,64): Error: template core.internal.atomic.atomicCompareExchangeStrongNoResult cannot deduce

Re: LDC 1.19.0-beta1

2019-11-07 Thread zoujiaqing via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 20:50:31 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.19: * Based on D 2.089.0. * Slight codegen improvements, incl. a breaking extern(D) ABI change for Posix x86[_64] targets, and dead branch elimination for if statements with constant condition